Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| RfPPB-22-1937 - Dr Nia Jones | Other Grant/Funding Number | Health and Care Research Wales |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
At the moment, no-one is sure what the best way to treat heel pain is. The purpose of this research is to try out some study methods to prepare for a future clinical trial, that will assess how helpful combining different treatments are for people with heel pain (plantar fasciitis). At this stage, the aim is only to test the study processes and ask for feedback - that is why this is called a feasibility study. No experimental techniques or devices will be tested. All of the treatments in the study are routinely carried out in NHS clinics, but participants will be allocated to different combinations of treatments.
Each participant will be asked to complete questionnaires and a diary for around six months in total. Some people will also be invited to take part in an interview or focus group discussion.
This single-centre study will test the feasibility of using a SMART design to provide tailored treatment pathways for people with heel pain. The study will investigate areas of uncertainty relating to the feasibility of a future full-scale SMART study. Key objectives are to assess whether the research design is feasible (including whether enough people can be recruited), and to determine whether the proposed adaptive intervention pathways are acceptable to patients and NHS staff.
50 people with heel pain will be recruited from referrals received by the Podiatry department. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups initially - half will have a virtual consultation with a podiatrist; the other half will receive a self-help video. After following the advice at home for at least 4 weeks, anyone (in either group) who has not responded to treatment will be offered an assessment in an outpatient clinic. They will then be randomised equally again to receive either an orthotic device (shoe insole) or a course of 'Shockwave therapy' (using a non-invasive device to deliver ultrasound to the injured area).
As well as collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for a total duration of 6 months for each participant, process evaluation methods (interviews and focus groups) will be used to talk to patients. They will be asked about their experiences of adaptive intervention pathways and of participating in the feasibility study. The researchers will also interview staff involved in trial design and delivery (clinical members of the study delivery team) about similar topics from a different perspective. Progression criteria will be used to help decide whether to continue with the plan to run a full-scale trial to test effectiveness of the treatment pathways.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive Intervention 1 (outcome subgroups A+B) | Active Comparator | First-line treatment: Virtual consultation. Those whose pain is not resolved after 4 weeks will progress onto second-line treatment: Orthotics. |
|
| Adaptive Intervention 2 (outcome subgroups A+C) | Active Comparator | First-line treatment: Virtual consultation. Those whose pain is not resolved after 4 weeks will progress onto second-line treatment: Shockwave therapy (ESWT). |
|
| Adaptive Intervention 3 (outcome subgroups D+E) | Active Comparator | First-line treatment: Self-help video. Those whose pain is not resolved after 4 weeks will progress onto second-line treatment: Orthotics. |
|
| Adaptive Intervention 4 (outcome subgroups D+F) | Active Comparator | First-line treatment: Self-help video. Those whose pain is not resolved after 4 weeks will progress onto second-line treatment: Shockwave therapy (ESWT). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual consultation | Behavioral | Virtual (telephone) consultation with a podiatrist, who will provide self-management advice to the participant including advice on footwear, massage, and stretching. Supplemented by written advice leaflets. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of recruitment (Progression Criterion 1) | Average number of participants per month. Stop if <2; Change if 2-6; Go if >6. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Fidelity of clinical delivery of the correct treatment at the correct stage (Progression Criterion 2) | Proportion of participants who receive the treatments they are allocated to after each randomisation. Stop if <50%; Change if 50-80%; Go if >80%. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Appropriateness of tailoring criteria and its threshold (Progression Criterion 3) | Minimum number of participants in any of the SMART outcome subgroups (A-F) at the end of the study. Stop if <1; Change if 1-4; Go if >4. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Rate of retention/loss to follow-up, including withdrawals (Progression Criterion 4) | Proportion of participants who fail to complete the study. Stop if >50%; Change if 20-50%; Go if <20%. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Acceptability of adaptive intervention pathways amongst patients | Qualitative interviews and/or focus groups will be carried out with participants to determine the acceptability of adaptive interventions and the study design, including barriers and facilitators to following self-management advice. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Acceptability of adaptive intervention pathways amongst staff | Qualitative interviews will be carried out with study staff to determine acceptability of adaptive interventions, including barriers and facilitators to delivering the SMART study. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Estimated effect size and variance | Composite outcome data from validated PROM - Revised Foot Function Index (short) | Baseline and Week 26 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of data collection tools (quantitative) | Completeness of PROM questionnaires and participant diaries/records. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Acceptability of data collection tools (qualitative) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nia J Jones, PhD | Contact | +442921844771 | Nia.Jones16@wales.nhs.uk | |
| Ruth L Poole, MPhil | Contact | +442921844771 | Ruth.Poole@wales.nhs.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nia J Jones, PhD | Cardiff and Vale University Health Board | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podiatry Department, Cardiff Royal Infirmary | Recruiting | Cardiff | Wales | CF24 0SZ | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D036981 | Fasciitis, Plantar |
| D000377 | Agnosia |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D005534 | Foot Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005208 | Fasciitis |
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001915 | Braces |
| D061826 | Foot Orthoses |
| D000074059 | Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009989 | Orthotic Devices |
| D009983 | Orthopedic Equipment |
| D013523 | Surgical Equipment |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial (SMART)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Self-help video | Behavioral | Self-help video providing self-management advice to the participant including advice on footwear, massage, and stretching. Available online or as a DVD. |
|
| Orthotics | Device | Provision of orthotics following an in-person musculoskeletal assessment by a podiatrist to check foot function, footwear, and position of feet, ankles, knees, and hip. Podiatrists prescribe, produce, and fit orthotic devices to be worn inside footwear. The devices used in this feasibility study will be selected according to individual patient needs. All will have regulatory certification (CE mark) and will be used in accordance with the manufacturer's Instructions For Use. |
|
|
| Shockwave therapy | Device | A 3-week course of Shockwave therapy following an in-person musculoskeletal assessment by a podiatrist to check foot function, footwear, and position of feet, ankles, knees, and hip. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is delivered by a podiatrist in an outpatient clinic. Most patients lie down during the procedure. The machine passes pulses of energy through the skin towards the injured area of the heel. This encourages the body to respond and aims to stimulate the healing process. Participants will need to attend the clinic approximately once a week for three weeks to complete the course of treatment. |
|
|
| Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
Qualitative information from staff and participant interviews/focus groups.
| Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Feasibility of collecting health service resource use data (staff time) | Any deviations from the usual amount of staff time required will be reported in narrative form by the delivery team. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Feasibility of collecting health service resource use data (equipment) | Any deviations from standard care with respect to the equipment required will be reported in narrative form by the delivery team. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Feasibility of collecting health service resource use data (number of appointments) | Participants will be invited to indicate their frequency of use of healthcare services in patient diaries. Each week they will be asked how many appointments they have had. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| Feasibility of collecting health service resource use data (type of appointment) | Participants be asked which type(s) of healthcare professional they have had appointments with (GP, nurse, physiotherapist, other) in weekly patient diaries. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year. |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D014464 |
| Ultrasonic Therapy |
| D003972 | Diathermy |
| D006979 | Hyperthermia, Induced |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |