Information on the patient (e.g., principal diagnosis, comorbidities, medication) is documented.

Evaluation of medical assessments and interventions following the incident, including Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, ophthalmologic or neurologic consultations.

Neurological status during ICU stay is assessed using available data in the patient register from validated neurological assessments. These may include the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC), or Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS). The specific tool used, as well as the scale of the score and meaning behind the score, depends on routine clinical practice and available documentation in the register. If multiple scores are available for a patient, they will be aggregated to provide a comprehensive assessment of neurological status. This outcome will be reported as a descriptive summary, synthesizing findings across tools, rather than as a single quantitative score.

Disease severity during ICU stay is assessed using standardized scoring systems, including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), depending on data availability in the patient register. The specific scoring system applied, as well as the scale and interpretation of the score, varies based on routine clinical practice and available documentation. Where multiple severity scores are available, they will be synthesized to provide a descriptive summary of overall illness severity rather than a single quantitative score.

The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is calculated based on pre-existing comorbidities and additional diagnoses. The CCI predicts the ten-year mortality for a patient who may have a range of comorbid conditions. It assigns weighted scores (from 0 to maximal 6) to 17 comorbid conditions (e.g., heart disease, diabetes, cancer), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 33, if the patient had the most severe form of each of the 17 conditions.

Routine laboratory value for e.g. C-Reactive Protein (CRP), albumin, Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH), Creatine Kinase (CK), procalcitonin, white blood cell levels, creatinine, liver enzymes, blood gas analyses, metabolic data, and toxicologic screenings, is collected. The specific parameters recorded may vary depending on the laboratory assessments documented in the patient register. All values will be reported using their respective units of measurement.These parameters are aggregated to support an overall clinical interpretation rather than a single numerical value. This approach reflects standard clinical practice, where multiple lab values are considered together to assess a patient's condition.

The Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) is calculated based on the assessment of key clinical outcomes such as inhospital mortality, survival, survival with neurofunctional alteration, return to premorbid neurological function, and hospital readmission to determine the patient outcome.

The GOS ranges from 1 (death) to 5 (good recovery).

The therapeutic intervention is document, including information on duration, dosage and number of treatment medication, number of neuroleptic, sedative and analgesic drugs, use of ipratropium bromide, invasive procedures, such as intubation, mechanical, ventilation, vasopressors, installation of central lines, i.v. thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, surgical hemicraniectomy, insertion of ventricular drains, intracranial pressure monitoring, i.v. administration of mannitol or saline, nutrition, etc.

Vital signs are analyzed based on the data available in the patient register. These may include blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, body temperature, level of consciousness, intracranial pressure, and drainage rate of cerebrospinal fluid. The specific parameters recorded depend on the clinical documentation available. All values will be reported using their respective units of measurement. These values are aggregated to support an overall clinical assessment rather than a single numerical score. This reflects standard practice, where multiple vital signs are interpreted together to evaluate a patient's condition.

Fluid balance data, including the administration of fluids such as blood products, crystalloids, and enteral/parenteral nutrition, are documented. These components are aggregated to represent overall fluid input for each patient.