The Addition of a PEP or O-PEP Device to Nebulization With Hypertonic Saline in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis During Exacerbation
The Addition of a PEP or O-PEP Device to Nebulization With Hypertonic Saline in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis During Exacerbation
Physiotherapy is an essential element in the comprehensive treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis. In symptomatic individuals, from a respiratory system perspective, it should be performed regularly, as it directly contributes to slowing disease progression. Even though patients perform airway-clearing physical therapy daily, it should be intensified during exacerbations. Although solutions for effectively clearing the airways have been sought for many years, there is still no leading technique for removing secretions from the respiratory tract. Modifications during inhalation aimed at thinning and loosening the accumulated thick mucus can facilitate the effective mobilization and expectoration of secretions, thus improving patients' quality of life.
The study aims to determine whether the addition of devices with positive expiratory pressure (Pari PEP System S) or positive pressure with oscillation (Aerobika) assists with hypertonic saline nebulization in patients with cystic fibrosis exacerbation. The study assesses whether these devices facilitate the easier evacuation of retained secretions, shorten bronchial drainage time, and improve pulmonary function test results. Participants are randomly assigned to specific groups (Group I - inhalation with O-PEP, Group II - inhalation with PEP, Group III - control group, standard inhalation) using a calendar formula (day of the month divided by 3). Each group performs bronchial drainage following the same protocol: autogenic drainage and a device with positive variable expiratory pressure (device name: Pari O-PEP).
The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. Does implementing inhalation devices improve functional test indicators and the amount of mucus expectorated during inhalation? 2. Are there differences in effectiveness between the groups?
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: