Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-A00122-43 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this research is to collect comprehensive data on a presbyopic population that may require near vision correction, in order to identify the most useful tests to accurately determine the value of an addition.
Refraction is the key point of an ophthalmic examination when visual correction is required for distance vision, as is determining the addition for near vision. These measurements can be obtained objectively and/or subjectively.
The addition for near vision is most often obtained using so-called subjective devices, i.e., by relying on the patient's responses.
The state of the accommodative system can, however, be measured objectively using instruments available to prescribers (retinoscopes, automatic refractometers, aberrometers, etc.). These measurements can be used in clinical practice as a solid basis for the initial assessment of the subject's refractive status during a comprehensive eye examination. However, these measurements are not sufficient to determine the optimal correction to prescribe for near vision, i.e., one that achieves sufficient visual acuity and comfort to ensure effectiveness for the tasks a person wishes to perform in their daily life.
Indeed, subjective tests are considered the gold standard for prescribers, particularly when it comes to near vision testing. Also, there are numerous procedures for determining the appropriate addition to prescribe, and a wide variety of practices is observed among prescribers around the world. It is often necessary to perform multiple tests to ensure the correct addition value to recommend.
The aim of this study is to find ways of approaching the value of the ideal addition as accurately as possible, based on several parameters: measurements representative of subjects' near vision habits, optometric measurements to determine near vision addition, and measurements related to binocular vision and symptomatology. This data collection will enable to identify the most effective combination of measurements in order to determine the optimal near vision addition for a subject.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Validation of new addition measurement methodologies | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Acuity | Device | VA will be measured for near and distance vision with an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subject's age | The subject's age is requested via the Case Report Form | Day 1 |
| Addition value given by the objective method | When you have presbyopia, the lens is no longer able to increase its power to accommodate near vision. It must then be helped by adding power for near vision, i.e., increasing the strength of the lens: this is called addition. The value of the addition is expressed in diopters (D) and is automatically measured by an auto-kerato-refractometer/aberrometer. It is an objective measure because it does not call upon the subject's responses when presented with acuity scales. | Day 1 |
| Addition value given by the subjective method | When you have presbyopia, the lens is no longer able to increase its power to accommodate near vision. It must then be helped by adding power for near vision, i.e., increasing the strength of the lens: this is called addition. The value of the addition is expressed in diopters (D) and is automatically measured by an autorefractometer. It is a subjective measure because it calls upon the subject's responses when presented with acuity scales. | Day 1 |
| Working distances for near vision | Several working distances are measured for near vision. The values of the distances are expressed in centimeters (cm). The various working distances for near vision are:
| Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Vision questionnaire (Qov) score | The QoV Questionnaire consists of a Rasch-tested, linear-scaled, 30-item instrument on three scales providing a QoV score in terms of symptom frequency, severity, and bothersome. It is suitable for measuring QoV in patients with all types of refractive correction, eye surgery, and eye disease that cause QoV problems. The QoV Questionnaire includes, 10 questions for each nature of evaluation (frequency, severity and bothersome) and 4 possible answers weighted by the values 0, 1, 2 or 3. The higher the score, the more frequently or intensely the symptom is perceived, or the more annoying it is, depending on the nature of the evaluation. Minimum score : 0 ; Maximum Score : 30. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
All categories of people specifically protected under French law are excluded from this research (Articles L1121-5 to L1121-9 of the Public Health Code):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| François Daniel | ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL - Division Instruments | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essilor International - Ci&T 2 | Créteil | 94000 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Objective refraction | Device | Objective refraction will be measured using an auto-kerato-refractometer/aberrometer |
|
| Standard Subjective refraction | Device | Standard subjective refraction for distance vision will be performed with Vision-R™ |
|
| Near vision examination and determination of additions | Device | Near vision examination and determination of additions will be performed with Vision-R™. The following objective and subjective measurement methods will determine the values of the various additions:
|
|
| Binocular vision tests | Device | The following measurements will be taken in trial glasses equipped with the final addition:
|
|
| Extended trial of addition | Device | The following measurements will be performed using trial glasses equipped with the final addition:
|
|
| Day 1 |
| CISS questionnaire (Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey) score | The CISS Questionnaire consists of a 14-item instrument providing a CISS score in terms of symptom frequency. Convergence Insufficiency is a condition in which a patient finds it difficult to maintain alignment of the eyes on a near object. The assessment of potential convergence difficulties in near vision may cause a person to look with just one eye at a time, or to see double. The Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey includes 5 questions relative to specific visual symptoms, with 5 possible answers weighted by the values 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4. The higher the score, the more frequently the symptom is perceived. Minimum Score : 0 ; Maximum Score : 60. | Day 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011305 | Presbyopia |
| D009216 | Myopia |
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014792 | Visual Acuity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014787 | Vision Tests |
| D003941 | Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D009799 | Ocular Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided