Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20240829 | Other Grant/Funding Number | SamanTree |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The clinical performance study is collecting data from the use of a CE mark product used within the scope of its intended purpose to intraoperatively visualize tissue specimen. The subjects are not submitted to invasive and burdensome procedures compared to the standard of care surgical practices and regular use of the CE mark product.
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Moreover, numerous women have the diagnosis of a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) each year, which can develop to invasive breast cancer without therapy. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is the most performed surgical treatment for women with early-stage breast cancer and/ or DCIS. There is an ongoing need for more immediate and accurate methods for the intraoperative assessment (IOA) of breast tissue margins to achieve tumor free margins. A method for rapidly and accurately identifying positive surgical margins intraoperatively would allow the surgeon to immediately excise additional tissue to achieve negative margins. Thereby sparing the Subject a reoperation with all following consequences i.e., reduced oncological safety, reduced cosmetic, and economic burden. The Histolog® Scanner (HLS), a confocal laser scanning microscope was developed with the CE Mark intended use of imaging excised human tissue specimens to visualize morphological microstructures. Such a feature allows real-time IOA offering cutting edge imaging support beyond the conventional imaging techniques in clinical decision making. Promising results have been previously obtained in the SENOSI study of Sion (Switzerland) and the POLARHIS and HELIXIR studies in Germany. Therefore, this study is proposed to evaluate in real life the reoperation rates (ROR) of breast cancer and/or DCIS surgery when the HLS is used in the context of breast tissue margin assessment.
Primary Objective:
Evaluate the proportion of patients that had a surgical reoperation due to cancer-positive margins (Reoperation Rate).
Secondary Objectives:
Detection Rate
Primary Endpoint:
Reoperation Rate
- Proportion of women who had a reoperation because of cancer positive margins identified at final pathology assessment.
Secondary Endpoints:
Detection Rate
Economic Impact
- Change in hospital cost per patient with BCS with or without using the HLS and accessories. This will be evaluated by monitoring the costs of breast conserving surgeries and the costs related to the use of the HLS including device price, HLS consumables, time of use of the HLS, reoperation rates and their associated surgical resources.
Safety
- Incidence of adverse device effects during the surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Cancer patient with Lumpectomy | Experimental | The clinical performance study is collecting data from the use of a CE mark product used within the scope of its intended purpose to intraoperatively visualize tissue specimen. The subjects are not submitted to invasive and burdensome procedures compared to the standard of care surgical practices and regular use of the CE mark product. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Histolog Scanner | Device | The clinical performance study is collecting data from the use of a CE mark product used within the scope of its intended purpose to intraoperatively visualize tissue specimen. The subjects are not submitted to invasive and burdensome procedures compared to the standard of care surgical practices and regular use of the CE mark product. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reoperation Rate | Proportion of women who had a reoperation because of cancer positive margins identified at final pathology assessment. | From enrollment to the end of treatment (surgery) at 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Detection Rate | - Agreement between margin cancerous status of the main surgical specimen and of recuts determined intraoperatively with the HLS and postoperative final pathology assessment using histological slides (sensibility and specificity) | 1 year |
| Usability |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Sex and gender are not a relevant variable in this study because it focuses exclusively on cisgender women with BCS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFR | Recruiting | Villars-sûr-glâne | Canton of Fribourg | 1752 | Switzerland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
- Usability rates of HLS and accessories: analysis time |
| 1 year |
| Economic Impact | - Change in hospital cost per patient with BCS with or without using the HLS and accessories. This will be evaluated by comparing the usual average cost of breast conserving surgeries and the costs related to the use of the HLS during the surgery | 1 year |
| Incidence of adverse device effects | Incidence of adverse device effects during the surgery. | 14 month |