Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this randomized clinical study is to assess the additional clinical benefit of incorporating a resorbable collagen membrane (CM) alongside a xenogeneic bone graft-specifically, deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBM-C)-in the reconstructive surgical treatment of peri-implantitis involving combined (i.e., contained and non-contained) defect configurations.
Accordingly, the study addresses the following research questions:
Reconstructive surgical therapy for peri-implantitis has shown improved clinical and radiographic outcomes, with favorable postoperative mucosal margin levels and superior radiographic bone fill compared to other treatment modalities. However, no specific biomaterial or application technique has yet been identified as clearly superior. In particular, the potential added value of combining a barrier membrane with a bone substitute, as opposed to using bone substitute alone, remains a subject of ongoing debate.
Recent studies have suggested that the adjunctive use of a barrier membrane does not necessarily enhance clinical or radiographic outcomes in peri-implantitis-associated intrabony defects. However, these studies often included heterogeneous defect morphologies, which may influence the regenerative potential and confound treatment outcomes.
Indeed, "contained" and "non-contained" defects may behave differently due to biological factors such as space maintenance, clot stability, and wound protection. his highlights the need to tailor biomaterial selection to the specific defect configuration. While current evidence suggests that barrier membranes may not provide additional benefit in fully contained defects, there is a lack of data regarding their effectiveness in combined defects that include both supracrestal and intrabony components, particularly those with partially contained 2- or 3-wall morphologies.
Therefore, the primary aim of this randomized clinical study is to evaluate the additional clinical benefit of incorporating a resorbable CM with DBMM-C in the reconstructive surgical treatment of peri-implantitis with combined defect morphology.
The secondary objective is to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in both treatment groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Group | Active Comparator | Reconstructive surgical therapy of combined peri-implantitis defects using a resorbable collagen membrane and DBMM-C. |
|
| Control group | Active Comparator | Reconstructive surgical therapy of combined peri-implantitis defects using only DBMM-C. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DBMM-C plus Resorbable collagen membrane | Device | A trapezoidal flap design will be employed, including a sulcular incision and vertical releasing incisions extending approximately 2-3 mm beyond the mucogingival junction. Flap advancement will be facilitated through a periosteal-releasing incision at the flap base. Granulation tissue will be removed using a titanium curette, and implant surface decontamination will be performed with a titanium brush. The graft material will be placed in both supra- and intrabony defect components, followed by coverage with a resorbable collagen membrane. The flaps will then be coronally advanced and stabilized over the biomaterials. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of treatment success (%) | The absence of bleeding on probing (BOP) at more than one site, no suppuration, deepest PPD ≤5mm, and no further radiographic bone loss. | 12 months after the surgical treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP) (%) | The percentage of BOP around six sites of the implant | 12 months after the surgical treatment |
| Probing pocket depth (PPD) | The distance between the bottom of the pocket and the mucosal margin around the implant |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sila Cagri Isler, PhD | Contact | +905069966074 | silaisler@gazi.edu.tr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry | Recruiting | Ankara | Turkey | 06490 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36802084 | Background | Regidor E, Ortiz-Vigon A, Romandini M, Dionigi C, Derks J, Sanz M. The adjunctive effect of a resorbable membrane to a xenogeneic bone replacement graft in the reconstructive surgical therapy of peri-implantitis: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2023 Jun;50(6):765-783. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13796. Epub 2023 Mar 6. | |
| 36852537 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057873 | Peri-Implantitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| DBMM-C | Device | A trapezoidal flap design will be employed, including a sulcular incision and vertical releasing incisions extending approximately 2-3 mm beyond the mucogingival junction. Flap advancement will be facilitated through a periosteal-releasing incision at the flap base. Granulation tissue will be removed using a titanium curette, and implant surface decontamination will be performed with a titanium brush. The graft material will be placed in both supra- and intrabony defect components, and then the flaps will be coronally advanced and stabilized over the graft material. |
|
| 12 months after the surgical treatment |
| Change in radiographic vertical defect depth | Marginal bone levels (MBL) will be assessed the distance between this line and the first bone-to-implant contact (BIC). The mesial and distal measurements will be averaged for further calculations. The radiographic vertical defect depth changes over time will be evaluated the difference between MBL at baseline and 12 months following the therapy. | 12 months after the surgical treatment |
| Patient morbidity - Postoperative pain | Postoperative pain will be assessed using a visual analogue score | At baseline and after 2 weeks and 1 and 12 months following surgical treatment |
| Patient-reported satisfaction with the overall treatment | Patient-reported satisfaction will be assessed using a visual analogue score | At baseline and after 2 weeks and 1 and 12 months following surgical treatment |
| Schwarz F, Becker K, Albrecht C, Ramanauskaite A, Begic A, Obreja K. Effectiveness of modified and control protocols for the surgical therapy of combined peri-implantitis-related defects. A retrospective analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 May;34(5):512-520. doi: 10.1111/clr.14057. Epub 2023 Mar 10. |
| 39815673 | Background | Raabe C, Cafferata EA, Couso-Queiruga E, Chappuis V, Ramanauskaite A, Schwarz F. Impact of Two Flap Advancement Techniques and Periosteal Suturing on Graft Displacement During Guided Bone Regeneration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13434. doi: 10.1111/cid.13434. |