Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL-MF-000010932 | Other Identifier | CCMO |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Avania | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Canopus Marker in adult breast cancer patients who are scheduled for breast-conserving surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
Breast cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies affecting women worldwide, necessitating a range of treatment modalities to manage and combat the disease effectively. These modalities include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and targeted therapy. Among these, breast-conserving surgery (BCS), also known as lumpectomy, has become a cornerstone of breast cancer treatment. BCS involves the removal of the cancerous tissue while preserving as much of the breast as possible. This approach aims to achieve oncologic safety comparable to mastectomy while offering psychological and cosmetic benefits. The success of BCS has been augmented by advancements in imaging techniques and surgical tools, facilitating precise tumour localization and excision.
Over the years, various localization technologies have been developed to enhance the precision of breast cancer surgeries. Traditional methods like wire localization have been widely used but are often associated with discomfort and logistical challenges. Advances in medical technology have led to non-wire localization methods such as radioactive seed localization (RSL) and radar systems. The commercially available Sirius Pintuition system, using magnetic seed localization, involves inserting a small magnetic marker into the tumour site, detectable with a magnetic probe during surgery. This system aims to offer advantages like improved subject comfort, precise localization, and ease of use for surgeons. The investigational Canopus Marker, building on Sirius Pintuition's success, aims to further improve the precision and effectiveness of breast-conserving surgeries. The Canopus Marker incorporates additional anchoring mechanisms designed to enhance its stability during breast-conserving surgeries. These enhancements aim to mitigate any potential risk of dislodgement, while maintaining the marker's detectability and ease of use for surgeons.
The present investigation is only evaluating if the additional anchors added to the Pintuition Marker, which is the Canopus Marker, is also safe and performing as intended. Therefore, the present investigation will be similar in design as the study that was conducted to obtain the Pintuition System's CE mark. That is, a single-arm, open-label study in one centre in The Netherlands. The sample size (n=35) is determined to demonstrate that the Canopus Marker does not perform worse than the Pintuition Marker and other similar marker-based localization devices.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary breast lesion and/or axillary lymph node localisation prior to surgical excision | Experimental | Device: CANOPUS Magnetic Marker by Sirius Medical Systems B.V. Placement of experimental device in primary breast lesion and/or axillary lymph node indicated for surgical removal and requiring localisation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnetic seed | Device | All patients enrolled will receive a single Sirius Canopus Marker with two anchors added to it for improved tissue fixation. Implantation will be done by a radiologist before breast conserving surgery, usually scheduled within a few days after Canopus Marker implantation. The Canopus Marker is removed with the specimen during the surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Performance: Retrieval Rate | Proportion of procedures in which the Canopus marker is present on post-operative specimen X-ray and only the Pintuition Detector is used during surgery. Hypothesis: => 85% | From enrolment to the follow-up visit at 2 weeks after surgery (estimated 3-5 weeks) |
| Safety: Investigational Device-Related Serious Adverse Device Effects | Proportion of patients who experienced an investigational device-related serious adverse device effect as assessed by MedDRA. Hypothesis: none. | From enrolment to the follow-up visit at 2 weeks after surgery (estimated 3-5 weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radiologist's Satisfaction | The secondary performance endpoints and hypotheses of this clinical investigation include: an overall radiologist satisfaction score of ≥7 measured on a 10-point Likert scale or comparable index | Post-procedural (implantation) |
| Surgeon Satisfaction |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bram Schermers, CEO/CTO | Contact | +31 6 48044508 | bram.schermers@sirius-medical.com | |
| Kitty Kempen Kempen, PhD, Clinical Affairs Director | Contact | +31 6 10223238 | kitty.kempen@sirius-medical.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis | Beverwijk | North Holland | 1942 LE | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
The secondary performance endpoints and hypotheses of this clinical investigation include: an overall surgical satisfaction score of ≥7 measured on a 10-point Likert scale or comparable index |
| Post-procedural (surgery) |
| Subject Satisfaction | The secondary performance endpoints and hypotheses of this clinical investigation include: an overall subject satisfaction score of ≥7 measured on a 10-point Likert scale or comparable index | At post-operative check (2 weeks follow-up visit) |
| Safety: Adverse Events | Secondary safety endpoints include the reporting of the incidence, severity and causal relationship of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), unanticipated serious adverse device events (USADEs) and device deficiencies (DDs) in accordance with ISO 14155:2020 definitions | From enrolment to the follow-up visit at 2 weeks after surgery (estimated 3-5 weeks) |
| Accuracy of Placement | Average distance between Canopus Marker centre and tumour centre on the two post-placement mammographic images in mm | Post-procedural (implantation) |
| Operative Time | Minutes from first incision until wound closure | Post-procedural (surgery) |
| Transcutaneous Detection Succesful | Proportion of procedures in which a reliable signal of the Canopus Marker is detected on the intact skin using the Pintuition Detector | Periprocedural (surgery) |
| Marker Dislodgements | Proportion of procedures in which the Marker dislodged during the surgical procedure. | Post-procedural (surgery) |
| Reoperation Rate | Second, separate surgical procedure of same lesion or area indicated after multidisciplinary discussion | From enrolment to the follow-up visit at 2 weeks after surgery (estimated 3-5 weeks) |