Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Previous research has shown the importance of font type, size and spacing to facilitate text reading in dyslexia. A special automatized procedure was designed to select the most favorable parameters for both text visualization and text-to-speech (TTS) conversion to be used by students with reading difficulties. The validation of its outcomes will be carried out through a systematic comparison of the use of the personalized versus standard fonts and voices in reading and writing tests.
Seleggo is a free compensatory tool for dyslexic students. It is an online platform where school textbooks are transcribed and visualized on the screen in portable format (PDF) versions, characterized by special attention to graphical features and readability, and can be listened to via TTS technology. Special functions such as karaoke modality, conceptual maps building software, summary creation, verbal and visual definition search and the possibility to record and retrieve one's own notes and sketches are also provided. Each student with Specific learning Disorder (SLD) has a personal library and can choose the parameters for text visualization to facilitate reading, modifying the display of the text, choosing font, size and spacing, as well as TTS parameters, such as speed and pitch.
The availability of many options for text visualization and TTS, however, can be advantageous only as far as the students are able to choose and use parameters that objectively facilitate their reading and comprehension. Since the analysis of the literature suggests that subjective choices may be misleading and that general recommendations may not fit the individual's needs, we decided to build an automatized, as objective as possible procedure to help the students find the combination of parameters that is most likely to facilitate them in reading and studying. This procedure, composed by an initial, gross-grained subjective procedure and followed by a thorough, systematic analysis of reading and comprehension performance, was named "Seleggo test" to match the compensatory tool it was meant to complement.
The present study aims to assess the actual advantage of personalized parameter selection through the "Seleggo Test" procedure in supporting reading compared to the use of standard parameters. The working hypothesis is that children with reading disorders would benefit from personalized text features and TTS.
The recruitment of participants will take place in schools. It is foreseen that 30 participants are recruited for each of the three groups: typically Developing children (TD), Developmental Dyslexia (DD) and Special Educational Needs (SEN) - with reading difficulties).
Additional children will be recruited form patients with DD at Scientific Institute (IRCCS) E. Medea, if necessary to reach the expected number. Children will attend the third grade of primary school to the third grade of middle school (7 to 15 years old).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participant | Experimental | All participants in the study will be assessed with the Seleggo Test procedure and then tested on reading and writing to dictation in the two conditions, with personalized and with standard visual and auditory parameters for text visualization and TTS |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seleggo Test | Device | Seleggo Test is a computerized procedure to identify the personalized visual and auditory parameters facilitating reading and writing for each participant. By applying these parameters to the visualization and to the TTS software during reading of school texts, the participants are expected to be facilitated in reading and understanding the text. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reading facilitation (speed), i.e. the advantage in reading performance (speed) produced by personalized parameters as compared to standard parameters | difference between reading speed (seconds to read the text displayed by the software) with personalized and with standard visual parameters | Intervention will take place during initial assessment and will last about 1,5 hours (comparison between personalized and standard parameters during the same assessment session) |
| Reading facilitation (accuracy), i.e. the advantage in reading performance (accuracy) produced by personalized parameters as compared to standard parameters | difference between reading accuracy (number of errors in reading the text displayed by the software) with personalized and with standard visual parameters | Intervention will take place during initial assessment and will last about 1,5 hours (comparison between personalized and standard parameters during the same assessment session) |
| Comprehension facilitation, i.e. the advantage in auditory comprehension performance produced by personalized TTS parameters as compared to standard parameters | difference between writing accuracy (number of errors in writing a pre-defined list of nonwords) for stimuli dictated with personalized and with standard auditory parameters in the TTS device | Intervention will take place during initial assessment and will last about 1,5 hours (comparison between personalized and standard parameters during the same assessment session) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| possibility to discriminate TD students' reading speed from that of students with DD and SEN | difference (ANOVAs) in performance (in terms of speed, expressed in seconds per syllable) on the reading tests delivered by the software, between the three groups (TD, DD and SEN) | about 10 months |
| possibility to discriminate TD students's reading accuracy from that of students with DD and SEN |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria (for TD group):
Exclusion Criteria (for TD group):
Inclusion Criteria (for DD group):
Exclusion Criteria (for DD group):
Inclusion Criteria (for SEN group):
Exclusion Criteria (for SEN group):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Luisa Lorusso, Ph.D | Contact | 031-877592 | marialuisa.lorusso@lanostrafamiglia.it |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRCCS E. Medea, polo di Bosisio Parini | Recruiting | Bosisio Parini | LC | 23842 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Lorusso ML, Borasio F, Panetto P, Curioni M, Brotto G, Pons G, Carsetti A, Molteni M. Validation of a Web App Enabling Children with Dyslexia to Identify Personalized Visual and Auditory Parameters Facilitating Online Text Reading. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2024; 8(1):5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Anonymous data will be shared through the Zenodo platform
Not provided
From the publication of the results onwards
free access, for anonymous data only
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004410 | Dyslexia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007806 | Language Disorders |
| D003147 | Communication Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
Not provided
Not provided
Each of the participants will be tested in two conditions: with personalized parameters and with standard parameters. Their performance in reading and writing to dictation will be compared in a single-group, within-subjects model. A post-hoc comparison will also be conducted to confirm the validity of the procedure by assessing the existence of the predicted between-groups differences in reading and writing performance.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
difference (ANOVAs) in performance (in terms of accuracy, expressed in number of errors) on the reading tests delivered by the software, between the three groups (TD, DD and SEN) |
| about 10 months |
| possibility to discriminate TD students' writing accuracy from that of students with DD and SEN | difference (ANOVAs) in performance (in terms of accuracy, expressed in number of errors) on the writing tests delivered by the software, between the three groups (TD, DD and SEN) | about 10 months |
| validity and reliability values for the reading speed measures collected by the software | Pearson's correlations between the speed measures collected during the test and the speed measures obtained on standardized reading tests (MT test of reading speed and accuracy and Assessment Battery for Developmental Reading and Spelling Disorders). | about 10 months |
| validity and reliability values for the reading accuracy measures collected by the software | Pearson's correlations between the reading accuracy measures collected during the test and the accuracy measures obtained on standardized reading tests (MT test of reading speed and accuracy and Assessment Battery for Developmental Reading and Spelling Disorders). | about 10 months |
| validity and reliability values for the writing accuracy measures collected by the software | Pearson's correlations between the writing accuracy measures collected during the test and the accuracy measures obtained on standardized writing tests (Assessment Battery for Developmental Reading and Spelling Disorders). | about 10 months |
| IRCCS E.Medea, polo di Conegliano | Recruiting | Conegliano | TV | 31015 | Italy |
|
| Associazione La Nostra Famiglia | Recruiting | Treviso | TV | 31100 | Italy |
|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D000067559 | Specific Learning Disorder |
| D007859 | Learning Disabilities |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |