Effect of Mulligan Versus Maitland Mobilization on Lumbar Proprioception in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Effect of Mulligan Versus Maitland Mobilization on Lumbar Proprioception in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
this study will be conducted to compare between the effect of mulligan mobilization versus Maitland mobilization on pain ,function and lumbar proprioception in patients with chronic nonspecific low pain
Low back pain (LBP) is considered as one of the most widespread musculoskeletal disorders, impacting over 80% of the world's population, resulting in work absence, medical consultation, a decline in quality of life, and financial burden. Lumbar repositioning error was high around 30° of trunk flexion in individuals with CLB. When lumbar proprioceptive deficiencies arise, the activation pattern of back muscles is disturbed, the mechanics of the spinal unit differs from that of a healthy spine, and the recurrence rate of LBP increases . CLBP is managed using various intervention modalities, including drug therapy and physical therapy approaches . Physical therapy modalities, such as manual therapy, therapeutic exercises, and biopsychosocial techniques, are used for treating LBP. Manual therapy is a common and suggested modality for treating CLBP that has strong evidence. It is employed in physical therapy practice, including Maitland mobilization and Mulligan mobilization. Mulligan mobilization as well as Maitland mobilization has significant effect on pain ,function disability and lumbar repositioning error. But there is gap about which is more beneficial. So we conduct this study to determine which technique is more beneficial for patients
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: