Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| CoreAalst BV | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
ICECAP is a multi-centre, prospective, single-arm, interventional, traditional feasibility clinical investigation to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-coronary cryotherapy on vulnerable or high-risk plaque (HRP), using the CryoTherapy System (CTS). The study aims to enroll 25 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, successfully treated for their culprit lesion and with presence of at least one HRP lesion in another vessel. Eligible patients will undergo cryotherapy during a planned procedure. Near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS and Optical Coherence Tomography imaging will be used during baseline procedure, and during a 9 months follow visit. The primary endpoint is reduction of plaque burden measured as 30% reduction in maxLCBI4mm as measured by NIRS at 9 months post procedure.
ICECAP is a multi-centre, prospective, single-arm, interventional, traditional feasibility clinical investigation to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-coronary cryotherapy on vulnerable or high-risk plaque (HRP), using the CryoTherapy System (CTS). The study aims to enroll 25 patients with stable angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Patients who have undergone successful treatment of their culprit lesion, and in whom presence of at least one non-flow-limiting HRP lesion in another vessel is identified (confirmed by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography - CCTA), are eligible for the study. Eligible patients will undergo cryotherapy using the CTS during a planned procedure within maximum 8 weeks after eligibility has been confirmed. Near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging will be used during baseline procedure, and during a 9 months angiographic follow visit. Clinical follow-up visits will be done at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-procedure. The primary endpoint is reduction of plaque burden, defined as 30% reduction in maxLCBI4mm measured by NIRS at 9 months post procedure. Secondary efficacy endpoints include: changes in fibrous cap thickness assessed by OCT at 9 months post-procedure, changes in Plaque volume and plaque composition at 9 months post-procedure. Safety endpoints include procedural success rates, any cryotherapy related complication or any Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) at 3 and 12 months post procedure. The enrolment period is expected to last 9 months, and all subjects will be followed for 12 months after the CTS procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment arm | Experimental | Subjects with coronary HRP lesions treated with intracoronary cryotherapy using the CTS device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intracoronary Cryotherapy | Device | Intracoronary cryotherapy for stabilization of High-risk coronary plaque |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary efficacy endpoint | Reduction of in maxLCBI4mm in the lesion measured by NIRS | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| co-primary safety endpoint | Rate of Cryotherapy procedure related complications or MACE | at 30 days post procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Fibrous Cap Thickness | Change in OCT-derived fibrous cap thickness | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline |
| Change in Minimal Lumen Area (MLA) | Change in minimum lumen area (MLA) by OCT |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
1) Subject is at least 18 years old. 2) Subject has acute cardiac pain/angina consistent with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome eligible for coronary angiography meeting one of the following criteria:
NOTE: subjects with unstable angina, for whom the culprit lesion as assessed by investigator does not require PCI currently or within the next 6 months (subject treated with optimal medical treatment) can be enrolled in the study.
4) Subject has at least one high-risk plaque meeting the criteria below:
Located in a non-culprit vessel,
High-risk plaque lesion on CCTA and at least one of the following features:
Lesion length ≤ 20 mm.
Diameter stenosis on invasive angiography between 30% and 70% on coronary angiogram or negative physiology assessment (FFR>0.80 or NHPR>0.89).
Reference vessel diameter (RVD) < 3.75 mm and > 2.50 mm in diameter
Investigator considers that lesions are accessible.
If more than two suitable lesions available, investigator will select the most appropriate lesion for cryotherapy treatment.
5) maxLCBI4mm in the lesion > 324.7 6) Subject is able to provide consent and has signed and dated the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
1) Subject is hemodynamically unstable (cardiogenic shock, hypotension needing inotropes, hypoxia needing intubation, refractory ventricular arrhythmias, and IABP).
2) Subject has ongoing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. 3) Subject had a procedural complication during the ACS PCI procedure. 4) Subject has history of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) or planned CABG within 12 months after the index procedure.
5) Subject has known reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction < 30%. 6) Subject has known severe valvular heart disease. 7) Subject has known severe renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 ml/min/1.72 m2). 8) Subject has any life-threatening conditions or medical comorbidity resulting in life expectancy < 12 months.
9) Subject is currently participating in another clinical investigation that has not yet reached its primary endpoint.
10) Subject has severe peripheral vascular disease impeding femoral artery access.
11) Subject is pregnant or lactating, or NOT surgically sterile (tubal ligation or hysterectomy) or NOT postmenopausal for at least 6 months or is a female with childbearing potential without effective contraception (pill, patch, ring, diaphragm, implant and intrauterine device).
Angiographic exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danny Detiege, RN | Contact | +32 467 02 47 73 | dde@cryotherapeutics.com | |
| Elisa Rossetti, MSc, Biomedical engineering | Contact | +3242644773 | ero@cryotherapeutics.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Carlos Collet, MD | Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, USA | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZORG Aalst | Recruiting | Aalst | 9300 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, Multi-Center, Interventional, Device Feasibility
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Prevalence of Thin Cap Fibrous Atheroma | Prevalence of thin cap fibroatheroma (minimum fibrous cap thickness < 65 µm with lipid arc > 90°) by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Prevalence of lipid Arc >90° | Prevalence of lipid arc greater than 90° by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Prevalence of lipid Arc >180° | Prevalence of lipid arc greater than 180° by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Prevalence of lipid Arc >270° | Prevalence of lipid arc greater than 270° by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Total angle of macrophage | Total angle of macrophage within the treated segment by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Maximum angle of macrophage | Maximum angle of macrophage within the treated segment by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Total angle of lipidic plaque | Total angle of lipidic plaque within the treated segment by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Maximum angle of lipidic plaque | Maximum angle of lipidic plaque within the treated segment by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Total angle of calcification | Total angle of calcification within the treated segment by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Maximum angle of calcification | Maximum angle of calcification within the treated segment by OCT. | At 9 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Total Plaque volume | Total Plaque volume within the treated lesion segment assessed by CCTA | At 12 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Calcified Plaque volume | Calcified Plaque volume within the treated lesion segment assessed by CCTA | At 12 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| Area stenosis | Area stenosis within the treated lesion segment assessed by CCTA | At 12 months post-CTS procedure compared to baseline. |
| St Bartholomew's Hospital | Not yet recruiting | London | EC1A 7BE | United Kingdom |
|
| Royal Brompton Hospital | Not yet recruiting | London | SW3 6NP | United Kingdom |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058225 | Plaque, Amyloid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided