Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study aims to evaluate the role of TRUS in improving the efficacy and safety of endoscopic enucleation of prostate and TURP.
Standard TURP is an established procedure for managing BPH but has limitations, including the risk of incomplete adenoma removal and complications such as bleeding. Research on transurethral enucleation techniques has demonstrated potential for improved outcomes, especially in larger prostates. However, challenges persist in achieving precise resection boundaries and minimizing intraoperative risks.
TRUS, widely utilized for prostate biopsy and volume assessment, has recently gained attention for its intraoperative applications. Studies show that real-time TRUS provides accurate imaging of prostate anatomy and resection planes, helping surgeons better differentiate adenomatous tissue from surrounding structures. This enhances surgical precision, reduces intraoperative bleeding, and minimizes residual tissue, leading to better outcomes in procedures like TURP and enucleation.
Current TURP and enucleation approaches depend heavily on endoscopic visual guidance, which, despite significant advancements, can lead to residual tissue, excessive bleeding, and prolonged recovery. While enucleation techniques have addressed some of these challenges, they remain less accessible due to high costs and steep learning curves, making them unsuitable for all healthcare settings.
Integrating TRUS into TURP or enucleation offers the potential to address these limitations by enhancing tissue differentiation and guiding precise resection. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of TRUS in reducing complications, achieving complete tissue removal, and improving patient recovery outcomes, potentially paving the way for its routine adoption in BPH surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Experimental | Control cases under went TURP and enucleation |
|
| TRUS Guided group | Experimental | TRUS guided group during TURP and enucleation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUS-Guided TURP and enucleation | Procedure | realtime TRUS guidance during the procedure (TURP and enucleation) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| efficacy of endoscopic treatment of BPH | Intervention efficacy will be evaluated by comparing the Peak flow rate in ml/second.(measured by uroflowmetry) between the two groups | At 12 weeks after the procedure |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Prostate cancer
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamed mostafa Elsharkawy, assistant lecturer of Urology | Contact | +201065811880 | mhmdsharkawy@aun.edu.eg | |
| Mahmoud Farouk Hassan, lecturer Of Urology | Contact | +201009152070 | Mahmoud12@aun.edu.eg |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ahmed Mohamed Abdel-Moniem Hassanein, professor of Urology | Assiut University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assiut university | Asyut | Egypt |
to put protect privacy of participants
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011470 | Prostatic Hyperplasia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard TURP and enucleation | Procedure | No TRUS guidance during the procedure (TURP and enucleation) |
|
| D052801 |
| Male Urogenital Diseases |