Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| the Danish Psychological Association | UNKNOWN |
| The Danish Regions: Foundation for Medical Research | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary aim of "the Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Common mental disorders" (EPIC) randomized controlled trial is to investigate whether a significantly larger symptom improvement is observed after approximately four months of psychotherapeutic treatment in the Danish primary sector compared to in a waiting list control group. The secondary aim of the study is to identify specific client and therapy characteristics that may predict the effectiveness of the therapy or the symptom development in the waiting list control group. The main hypothesis of the EPIC trial is:
1) Four and a half months after randomization, we will find a significantly lower level of symptoms on the primary outcome measure (PHQ-ADS) among clients who receive psychotherapy, compared to clients in the waiting list control group. In addition, we hypothesize to find significantly better outcomes in the psychotherapy group on all secondary outcome measures, four and a half months after randomization.
Researchers will compare:
to investigate whether a larger symptom improvement is observed in the group receiving psychotherapy compared to the waiting list control group.
Participants will:
Aims:
The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate whether a significantly higher symptom improvement is observed after approximately four months of psychotherapeutic treatment in the Danish primary sector compared to a waiting list control group. A supplementary aim is to explore whether the treatment effect is maintained during follow-up assessed approximately eight and 16 months after the beginning of treatment. The secondary aim of the study is to investigate whether specific client and therapy characteristics predicting the effect of the therapy and the symptom change in the waitlist control group can be identified, and whether the quality of the therapeutic alliance measured after approximately five weeks of therapy is related to the outcome of therapy.
The hypotheses of the study are as follows:
Four and a half months after randomization, we will find a significantly lower level of symptoms on the primary outcome measure (PHQ-ADS) among clients who receive psychotherapy, compared to clients in the waiting list control group. In addition, we hypothesize to find significantly better outcomes in the psychotherapy group on all secondary outcome measures, four and a half months after randomization.
We expect that the client's coping strategies, emotion regulation strategies, and level of personality pathology will be significantly related to symptom change and treatment dropout amongst the clients receiving psychotherapy, and to symptom change in the waitlist group, four and a half months after randomization.
We expect that the quality of the working alliance after approximately five weeks of therapy will be significantly related to symptom change on the PHQ-ADS after four and a half months of therapy. Conversely, we do not expect that the therapeutic orientation of the psychologist will be independently related to symptom change after four and a half months of therapy.
We will explore whether the symptom change observed after approximately four and a half months persists eight and a half and 16 and a half months after the beginning of therapy.
Primary Analysis:
- The primary analysis of the general treatment effect in the practice sector will consist of a multilevel longitudinal regression model. This model will assess the difference in the rate of change between the intervention group and the control group in the PHQ-ADS scores over a period of approximately four months of therapy.
Secondary Analyses:
Secondary Predictor Analyses:
All analyses are conducted as intention-to-treat with multiple imputations of missing data.
Study Design:
The study is designed as a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a block randomization of clients referred by their general practitioner (GP) for psychotherapy treatment in the primary care sector in Denmark. The clients are randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio to one of the following options:
Participants:
Participants will typically be referred by their GP based on one of 11 referral reasons, which include:
Procedure:
Ethics:
Dissemination of Results:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wailist Control Group | Other | Description: Clients in the waitlist control group will be placed on a waiting list for psychotherapy with treatment starting approximately four and a half months after the date of randomization. Objective: To serve as a control group to the intervention group receiving psychotherapy and to investigate distinct symptom trajectories during the waiting period. |
|
| Psychotherapy Intervention Group | Experimental | Description: Clients in the psychotherapy intervention group will receive psychotherapeutic treatment with treatment starting within 14 days of the randomization date. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of psychotherapy in the Danish primary sector over approximately a four-month period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychotherapeutic treatment | Other | The psychotherapeutic treatment will reflect the therapy practices that characterize the Danish primary sector. Treatment: Clients are referred by their GP to receive up to 12 individual psychotherapy sessions, typically of 50-60 minutes' duration. For clients with depression and anxiety as referral reason, it is possible to get a supplementary referral by the GP ensuring 12 more sessions, totaling 24 sessions of therapy. Procedure: Due to the Danish primary sector having relative freedom in method of choice, the psychologist carries out the psychotherapy according to the treatment principles they consider the most relevant, without clauses regarding specific models of therapy or manualization. The therapists register the therapeutic approaches and interventions used in each course of therapy on The Multitheoretical List of Therapeutic Interventions (MULTI-30)at the end of each treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) | The PHQ-ADS combines the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 in to a composite measure of depression and anxiety. The PHQ-ADS sums the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 in to a total score ranging from 0 to 48. The PHQ-ADS has demonstrated high internal reliability as well as convergent validity and con-struct validity in a large sample of primary care patients. | Measured at: Baseline, bi-weekly, four and a half months after randomization date, eight and a half months after randomization date, 12 months after randomization date |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) | The SDS is a three-item rating scale that assesses functioning in relation to three domains: work and/or education, social relationships, and family life. The client rates the extent to which a given domain has been impaired by psychological symptoms within the last month, on a scale from 0 ("not at all impaired") to 10 ("very severely impaired"). | Measured at: Baseline, four and a half months after randomization date, eight and a half months after randomization date, 12 months after randomization date |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Clients:
Psychologists:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clients considered unfit for participation or urgently needing psychological or medical help, as determined by the therapist.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celia Faye Jacobsen, PhD | Contact | 45+ 22261168 | celia.jacobsen@psy.ku.dk | |
| Stig Poulsen, Professor | Contact | 45 + 28593543 | stig.poulsen@psy.ku.dk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stig Poulsen, Professor | University of Copenhagen | Principal Investigator |
| Ole Karkov Østergård, Associate Professor | Aalborg University | Study Chair |
| Carsten Hjorthøj, Associate Professor |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Copenhagen | Recruiting | Copenhagen | Central Region | 1452 | Denmark |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| The official website for the EPIC trial | View source |
Not provided
No participant data is planned to be shared with other researchers besides the EPIC research team members.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
| D000083626 | Psychosocial Intervention |
| D014850 | Waiting Lists |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D001071 | Appointments and Schedules |
| D009934 | Organization and Administration |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Waiting List for Psychotherapeutic Treatment | Other | Treatment: During the waiting list period, clients will not receive any psychotherapeutic treatment for their mental health issues in the Danish primary sector. However, their general practitioner may refer them to appropriate psychiatric treatment if their mental condition worsens and requires immediate treatment. Procedure: Clients in the waiting list group will fill in questionnaires on their symptom development during the waiting period. They will complete the same set of predictor and outcome questionnaires as the psychotherapy group. |
|
|
| The WHO-5 well-being index (WHO-5) | The WHO-5 is a five-item rating scale on psychological wellbeing. Each item relates to wellbeing within the past two weeks and is rated on a scale from 0 ("none of the time") to 5 ("all of the time"). The total raw score is multiplied by four to compute a percentage scale from 0 (absence of wellbeing) to 100 (maximal wellbeing). | Measured at: Baseline, four and a half months after randomization date, eight and a half months after randomization date, 12 months after randomization date |
| Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | The PSS is a ten-item questionnaire assessing the client's experience of stress within the last month. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("never") to 4 ("very often"), with a sum score ranging from 0-40. | Measured at: Baseline, four and a half months after randomization date, eight and a half months after randomization date, 12 months after randomization date |
| The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | The CSQ is an eight-item questionnaire assessing the client's satisfaction with the therapy. The items are rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from one to four, with a sum score ranging from 8-32. | Measured at: Baseline, four and a half months after randomization date. |
| The Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ) | The NEQ is a 20-item questionnaire assessing the occurrence and severity of a series of negative events associated with receiving psychotherapy. | Measured at: Baseline and four and a half months after randomization date. |
| University of Copenhagen |
| Study Chair |
| Celia Faye Jacobsen, PhD | University of Copenhagen | Study Chair |