Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Statement of the problem: Immediate implant placement is faced with several problems. One of the most important is the jumping gap present after implant placement and whether it needs to be augmented or not.
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of xenograft to xenograft mixed with HAM gel for grafting of the jumping gap in immediate implant placement in the molar region.
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of xenograft to xenograft mixed with HAM gel for grafting of the jumping gap in immediate implant placement in the molar region.
Materials and Methods: This parallel arm, randomized controlled clinical trial will involve systemically free patients with remaining roots or badly decayed teeth in the posterior region requiring implant placement. They will be randomly allocated to two equal groups. Group A (control group, n=12) will receive immediate implants (grafting with xenograft), and group B (test group, n=12) will receive immediate implants (grafting with xenograft& HAM). After implant placement, buccal bone thickness (1ry outcome), bone density (2nd outcome) and implant stability will be assessed (2nd outcome). The parameters will be assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Postoperative pain and swelling will be recorded daily by the patient for the 1st two weeks post surgically. Postoperative medication will be prescribed to the patient and postoperative instructions will be explained in detail. Follow-up will be performed to assess the parameters and to ensure performing proper oral hygiene. Data collected will be tabulated and statistically analyzed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xenograft | Active Comparator | Gap distance grafting using xenograft. |
|
| Xenograft mixed with HAM gel. | Active Comparator | Gap distance grafting using xenograft mixed with HAM gel. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xenograft | Procedure | Gap distance grafting using xenograft |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Buccal bone thickness | assessment of the buccal bone thickness using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in mm | At Baseline , Six months & 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant stability | using Ostell | at baseline,6 and 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| faculty of oral and dental medicine , Suez university | Suez | Suez Governorate | 12345 | Egypt |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014183 | Transplantation, Heterologous |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014180 | Transplantation |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
blinding of outcome assessors and participants will be achieved as the different outcomes will be assessed for all groups by assessors other than the researchers doing the procedures.
| Xenograft mixed with HAM gel. |
| Procedure |
Gap distance grafting using xenograft mixed with HAM gel. |
|