Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Briota ApS | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to determine if using the SiA® (Systematic Intervention Agent) system can improve inhaler technique and medication adherence in adults with asthma who are already using Trimbow pMDI inhalers. Furthermore, it will be addressed if the SiA® system can be used to discriminate between patients, where increased inflammatory markers are caused by incorrect inhaler technique/adherence to medication or patients that have ongoing inflammation requiring adjustment of therapy. Potentially those who might become candidate for biological treatments.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will:
The study does not have a comparison group and all results will be compared to baseline.
Background and Rationale Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that affects millions of individuals worldwide. Despite the availability of effective inhaled medications, poor adherence and incorrect inhaler technique remain major barriers to optimal asthma control. Studies show that up to 86.7% of asthma patients make at least one inhaler technique error, and 30-40% demonstrate poor adherence to their prescribed medication. These factors contribute to worsened symptoms, increased healthcare utilization, and reduced quality of life.
The SiA® system, developed by Briota ApS, aims to address these challenges by integrating a smart inhaler cap (RespiPRO™) with a mobile application. This system provides real-time feedback on inhaler technique and adherence, allowing patients and healthcare providers to track progress and make necessary adjustments.
This study seeks to determine whether using the SiA® system alongside a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) therapy can lead to measurable improvements in medication adherence, inhalation technique, and asthma control. Furthermore, it will be addressed if the SiA® system can be used to discriminate between patients, where increased inflammatory markers are caused by inadequate treatment caused by incorrect inhaler technique/adherence to medication or patients that have ongoing inflammation requiring adjustment of therapy. Potentially those who might become candidate for biological treatments.
Study Design This is a prospective, single-arm observational study conducted at two hospitals in Denmark. It is designed to assess how the SiA® System impacts inhaler technique and medication adherence over a 12-month period.
Key Features of the Study Design:
Study Setting:
Data Collection Methods:
Data will be collected through multiple sources:
Technology Used in the Study:
Study Timeline:
Total Study Duration: 22 months, with individual patient follow-up lasting 12 months (52 weeks).
Patient Flow and Study Visits:
Screening and Baseline Visit (Week 0) - Study Enrolment
Interim Follow-up Visit (Week 12) - Progress Check
Patients will return for an in-person visit.
Repeat measurements:
Adherence data from the SiA® system will be reviewed.
Patients will complete a satisfaction survey about their experience with the SiA® system.
Final Study Visit (Week 52) - End of Study
Potential Impact of the Study
This study aims to generate real-world evidence on how digital health interventions can improve asthma management. If successful, the SiA® System could:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study population | Asthma patients above 18 years of age, with objectively verified diagnosis of asthma according to GINA, uncontrolled T2 inflammation (FeNO >25ppm) on BDP/FF/G inhalation treatment with prescribed rescue medication (SABA). |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the impact of the SiA® platform on the level of the type 2 inflammation biomarker FeNO | To assess the impact of the study on the type 2 biomarker FeNO with a change from baseline of at least 20% will be considered clinically relevant. FeNO values will be presented as ppb. FeNO levels of < 25 ppb, 25 - 50 ppb, > 50 ppb, are considered low, medium, and high respectively. | Change from baseline in FeNO at week 12 and 52. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the impact of the SiA® platform on adherence to SITT and inhaler technique measure using the RespiPRO add-on module | Change in inhaler adherence measured as percentage of days covered and inhaler technique scores based an assessments of inhalation video recordings an data collected from the SiA® platform using a scoring system of 1-5, where 5 = Optimal technique; 4 = Poor technique with one critical error; 3 = Poor technique with two critical errors; ≤2 = Poor technique with three or more critical errors. The RespiPRO™ cannot monitor step 1 and 2, thus are these by default set to 1, hence the minimum inhaler technique scores achievable from RespiPRO™ is 2. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients ≥18 years of age.
Objectively verified leading diagnosis of asthma according to GINA
FeNO >25 ppb.
Treated with Trimbow 87/5/9 pMDI for >4 weeks before enrolment,
Being literate Danish.
Having a personal Android/iOS phone and 4G/5G internet connection.
Comfortable using a smart phone and Bluetooth enabled Digital Devices.
Willingness to participate in the study, understand the written patient information and being able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Asthma patients above 18 years of age, with objectively verified diagnosis of asthma according to GINA, uncontrolled T2 inflammation (FeNO >25ppm) on BDP/FF/G inhalation treatment with prescribed rescue medication (SABA).
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolai Krogh, PhD | Contact | +4526850170 | n.krogh@chiesi.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Johannes M Schmid, PhD, ass. professor | Aarhus University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre | Recruiting | Hvidovre | Capital Region | DK-2650 | Denmark |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42414967 | Derived | Baekdal JA, Krogh N, Sakhare G, Bendstrup E, Ulrik CS, Schmid JM. Study protocol: a 52-week, multicentre, observational, prospective study on the use of a smart platform connected to a single-inhaler triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) to evaluate effectiveness on treatment adherence and inhaler technique in patients with poorly controlled asthma. BMC Pulm Med. 2026 Jul 7. doi: 10.1186/s12890-026-04454-1. Online ahead of print. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001249 | Asthma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001982 | Bronchial Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D008173 | Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Change in pMDI inhaler technique score and medication adherence score at week 12 and 52 compared to baseline. |
| To evaluate the impact of the SiA® platform on asthma control using Asthma Control Test | Asthma control will be assesed using Asthma Control Test (ACT), which is a patient self-administred tool for identifying those with poorly controlled asthma. A maximum score of 25 points indicates complete asthma control. A score between 20 and 25 represents well controlled asthma, while a score of 19 or below represents not well controlled asthma, and a score less than 16 indicates very poorly controlled asthma. | Change in ACT scores from baseline at weeks 12 and 52 |
| To evaluate the impact of the SiA® platform on health-related quality of life | To assess the impact of the study on Health-related Quality of Life (HR QoL) using Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ). The mini-AQLQ has 15 questions in the same domains as the original AQLQ (symptoms, activities, emotions and environment). | Change in mini-AQLQ scores from baseline at weeks 12 and 52 |
| To evaluate the impact of the SiA® platform on lung function measured by spirometry | Change in lung function parameters (change in mean FEV1, FEV1 %-predicted, FEV1/FVC ratio, FEF25-75) from baseline at weeks 12 and 52 | From baseline and at week 12 and 52. |
| To evaluate the impact of the SiA® platform on shifts in FeNO category | Change in FeNO category (low, intermediate, high) defined as (< 25 ppb, 25 - 50 ppb, > 50 ppb, respectively. | Change from baseline at week 12 and 52. |
| To evaluate the impact of the SiA® platform on annualized exacerbations rates | Retrospective data from the past 12 months will gathered the number of moderate and severe exacerbations as defined by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. | Change in annualized exacerbation rates (moderate and severe) from baseline at week 52 |
| o evaluate the impact of the SiA® platform on the use of rescue medication (SABA) | To assess the impact of the study intervention on use of rescue medication (SABA) measured as average puffs per day/week/month. | Change from baseline (first 7 days after entering the study) in the use of rescue medication (SABA) at week 12 and 52). |
| Satisfaction and compliance with add-on device based on a customized survey | Satisfaction score at week 52 assessed using a customized questionnaire. The survey reports on 9 question related to the satisfaction with SiA® platform. Each of the 9 question can be given a score from 1-5. where 1 = very difficult/dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, and 5 = very easy/satisfied. | at week 52. |
| Aarhus University Hospital | Recruiting | Aarhus | Central Jutland | DK-8200 Aarhus N | Denmark |
|
| D012130 |
| Respiratory Hypersensitivity |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |