Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To study the safety and efficacy of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-targeted immunosuppressive chimeric antigen receptor-dendritic cell (CAR-DC) in the treatment of end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy and provide a new method for the treatment of end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy.
Background: Immune system activation and myocardial fibrosis are widely observed in patients with heart failure, whether it is ischemic or non-ischemic heart failure. Therefore, targeting inflammation and cardiac fibrosis may become a universal therapeutic strategy for the treatment of heart failure. At present, T cell surface molecular group modification (such as CAR-T) has been found to reduce fibrosis and restore cardiac function after injury in rodent heart failure models, suggesting that immune cells may be one of the potential effective targets for the treatment of heart failure. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most powerful professional antigen-presenting cells in the body. Immature DCs have strong migration ability, and mature DCs can effectively activate naive T cells, which are at the center of initiating, regulating, and maintaining immune responses. Studies have confirmed that dendritic cells are involved in regulating inflammatory responses after myocardial injury.
Here, we innovatively applied chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology to edit DCs, making the new CAR immune cells exhibit an immunosuppressive phenotype, leading to T cell tolerance to CAR immune cells without producing new antigens; and targeting fibroblast activation protein (FAP) to accumulate in the fibrotic area of cardiac injury, thereby reducing fibrosis and enhancing cardiac function.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive CAR-DC (iCDC) in the treatment of patients with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy.
Study design: This study is a prospective, single-center, single-arm clinical study. The study objects are patients aged 18 to 75 years with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction < 35%) who visited the Department of Cardiology. In this study, patients with end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy were proposed to undergo FAP iCDC Cell therapy.
Outcome measure: The primary outcome is evaluation of the safety of FAP iCDC for end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy. The secondary outcomes are left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance, enhanced volume assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance, interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support (INTERMACS) grade, left ventricular internal dimension in systole (LVIDs), left ventricular internal dimension in diastole (LVIDd), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP), 6 minutes walk test (6-MWT), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| dilated cardiomyopathy | Experimental | Administration of FAP immunosuppressive CAR-DC cell therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy. Patients are planned to be enrolled in the dose-escalation trial (1×10^5/kg、4×10^5/kg、and 8×10^5/kg) .The first dose group (4×10⁵/kg) initially enrolls 3 subjects to observe Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) responses.
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAP immunosuppressive CAR-DC | Biological | Each subject receive FAP immunosuppressive CAR-DC by intravenous infusion |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The proportion of subjects with Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) | The proportion of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0 | in 14 days after injection |
| Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) | Incidence of iCDC treatment-emergent adverse events | in 14 days after injection |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) | The difference of LVEF from baseline. LVEF will be assessed by echocardiography. | 1, 3, 6 months after injection |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Xinyang Hu, PhD | 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | 310009 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002311 | Cardiomyopathy, Dilated |
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006332 | Cardiomegaly |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009202 | Cardiomyopathies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The difference of LVEF from baseline. LVEF will be assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR).
| 6 months after injection |
| Enhanced volume (volume%) | The difference of Enhanced volume (volume%) from baseline. Enhanced volume will be assessed by CMR. | 6 months after injection |
| INTERMACS Profile | Profile 1. Critical cardiogenic shock; Profile 2. Progressive decline on inotropic support; Profile 3. Stable but inotrope dependent; Profile 4. Resting symptoms home on oral therapy; Profile 5. Exertion Intolerant; Profile 6. Exertion Limited; Profile 7. Advanced NYHA Class III symptoms | 1, 3, 6 months after injection |
| Left ventricular internal diameter end systole (LVIDs) | The difference of LVIDs from baseline. LVIDs will be assessed by echocardiography. | 1, 3, 6 months after injection |
| Left ventricular internal diameter end diastole (LVIDd) | The difference of LVIDd from baseline. LVIDd will be assessed by echocardiography. | 1, 3, 6 months after injection |
| Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) | The difference of LVESV from baseline. LVESV will be assessed by CMR. | 6 months after injection |
| Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) | The difference of LVEDV from baseline. LVEDV will be assessed by CMR. | 6 months after injection |
| NT-proBNP | Analysis of differences of NT-proBNP serum level from baseline. | 1, 3, 6 months after injection |
| 6 minutes walk test (6MWT) | The difference of 6MWT from baseline. | 1, 3, 6 months after injection |
| assessment of heart failure symptom | The difference of heart failure symptom, which will be assessed by NYHA grading and KCCQ score. | 1, 3, 6 months after injection |
| Incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) | Incidence of Cardiac death, readmission due to heart failure. | 1, 3, 6 months after injection |
| incidence of adverse events | Incidence of adverse events of heart, nerve system, mental system, digestive system and immune system. | 6 months |
| D000083083 |
| Laminopathies |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |