Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Cranioplasty is the main reconstructive neurosurgical procedure, performed in approximately 80% of patients who have previously undergone demolitive surgeries in an emergency setting, particularly in the case of decompressive craniectomy . It mainly aims to ensure the protection of brain tissue and improve the aesthetic appearance. Statistical correlation analyses between timing of cranioplasty and neurological recovery are probably in favor of early cranioplasty. Cranioplasty improves motor and cognitive rehabilitation outcomes. However, it carries an increased risk of postoperative complications, such as seizures and infections. Other studies show that cranioplasty performed 3 to 6 months after craniectomy can significantly improve motor and cognitive recovery.
The timing of the intervention plays a fundamental role in enucleating cognitive improvement. In fact, greater cognitive changes have been observed in patients who underwent cranioplasty within 6 months of the injury. Therefore, cranioplasty must be considered a key factor for neuropsychological recovery and should be performed early in order to make the most of the rehabilitation window. In the literature, there are studies that have evaluated how cranioplasty can facilitate cognitive recovery, regardless of timing. In particular, a significant cognitive recovery was observed in the period immediately following cranioplasty, while the improvement stabilizes after a certain period of time and recovery begins to slow down. In patients with severe acquired brain injury (GCA), cranioplasty seems to significantly improve neuropsychological and motor function, even after a long time from the procedure. The aim of the study is therefore to evaluate whether in patients with severe acquired brain injury who underwent cranioplasty in the neurorehabilitation setting there is an improvement in cognitive, motor functions and psychological aspects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary objective | The primary objective of the study is to analyze the neuropsychological profile of a sample of patients with severe acquired brain injury, who underwent craniotomy and subsequent opercular reapposition surgery 30 days after surgery. |
| |
| Secondary objective | Evaluate the relationship between neuropsychological aspects and neurosurgical intervention of opercular re-opposition 7 days after surgery and any differences between 7 and 30 days; Analyze motor performance; Analyze cerebral metabolism of the patient sample. Analyze motor performance of the patient sample: |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| improvement of cognitive functions and psychological aspects | Other | To analyze the neuropsychological, motor and functional profile of a sample of patients with severe acquired brain injury, who underwent craniotomy and subsequent opercular reapposition surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Neuropsychological profile | To analyze the neuropsychological profile of a sample of patients with severe acquired brain injury, who underwent craniotomy and subsequent opercular reapposition surgery | At baseline (T0) and 30 days after surgery (T1) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Analyze the various aspects | To evaluate the relationship between neuropsychological aspects and neurosurgical intervention of opercular reopposition, to analyze motor performances, cerebral metabolism and motor performances of the patient sample. | At T0: at the time of admission (pre-surgery); At T1: approximately one week after the operculum repositioning procedure; > At T2: approximately one month after the operculum repositioning procedure. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female patient aged 18 to 79 years;
Exclusion Criteria:
Age <18 or over 80;
Not provided
Not provided
Adult male and female patients with severe acquired brain injury who underwent craniotomy and subsequent opercular reapposition who met the inclusion criteria and did not meet any exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad alta intensità , Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" | Roma | RM | 00168 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39407375 | Background | Sheikh MA, Ali S, Khan A. Uroflowmetry: nomograms in healthy young Pakistani men. J Pak Med Assoc. 2024 Oct;74(10):1806-1810. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.10626. | |
| 34830718 | Background | Corallo F, Lo Buono V, Calabro RS, De Cola MC. Can Cranioplasty Be Considered a Tool to Improve Cognitive Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury? A 5-Years Retrospective Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 21;10(22):5437. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225437. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 25640571 | Background | Corallo F, Calabro RS, Leo A, Bramanti P. Can cranioplasty be effective in improving cognitive and motor function in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness? A case report. Turk Neurosurg. 2015;25(1):193-6. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.10618-14.2. |
| 26647093 | Background | Di Stefano C, Rinaldesi ML, Quinquinio C, Ridolfi C, Vallasciani M, Sturiale C, Piperno R. Neuropsychological changes and cranioplasty: A group analysis. Brain Inj. 2016;30(2):164-71. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1090013. Epub 2015 Dec 8. |
| 30280509 | Background | De Cola MC, Corallo F, Pria D, Lo Buono V, Calabro RS. Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review. Brain Behav. 2018 Nov;8(11):e01106. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1106. Epub 2018 Oct 2. |
| 27499122 | Background | Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, Ahmad FU. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Nov;33:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Aug 4. |
| 27609482 | Background | Corallo F, De Cola MC, Lo Buono V, Marra A, De Luca R, Trinchera A, Bramanti P, Calabro RS. Early vs late cranioplasty: what is better? Int J Neurosci. 2017 Aug;127(8):688-693. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2016.1235045. Epub 2016 Sep 28. |
| 34674047 | Background | Ozoner B. Cranioplasty Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Role in Neurorecovery. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;21(11):62. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01147-6. |
| 30681549 | Background | Corallo F, De Cola MC, Lo Buono V, Cammaroto S, Marra A, Manuli A, Calabro RS. Recovery of Severe Aphasia After Cranioplasty: Considerations on a Case Study. Rehabil Nurs. 2020 Jul/Aug;45(4):238-242. doi: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000212. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001930 | Brain Injuries |
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided