Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Diabetes Canada | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Empagliflozin and Semaglutide, individually and combined, added to Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) works to improve time-in-range in adults living with Type 1 Diabetes. It will also evaluate the safety of Empagliflozin and Semaglutide in this context.
The primary hypothesis of this study is :
- The combination therapy of semaglutide and empagliflozin will increase time-in-range compared to placebo when added to AID therapy.
The secondary hypotheses are :
In this study, the research team will compare Empagliflozin and Semaglutide to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if they improve time-in-range.
This study has four groups:
Group 1: semaglutide injection + empagliflozin tablet. Group 2: semaglutide injection + placebo tablet. Group 3: placebo injection + empagliflozin tablet. Group 4: placebo injection + placebo tablet.
This is a 2x2 factorial crossover study. This means that all participants will undergo both injection intervention (placebo and semaglutide) arms. Within each injection arm, participants will take both tablets (placebo and empagliflozin). By the end of the study, every participant will have taken part in each study group.
This study is designed as a 2x2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial to investigate the effects of semaglutide and empagliflozin, individually and combined, on time-in-range (TIR) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using automated insulin delivery (AID) systems.
Study Design and Randomization:
Factorial Design: The 2x2 factorial design allows for the simultaneous assessment of two interventions (semaglutide and empagliflozin) and their interaction. This design efficiently explores the individual and combined effects of the drugs. Randomization: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to determine the order of the semaglutide and placebo injections (Arm A: semaglutide first, Arm B: placebo first). Within each arm, the order of empagliflozin and placebo tablets will also be randomized 1:1. This ensures that any potential carryover effects are minimized. Double-Blind: Both participants and investigators will be blinded to the treatment assignments, minimizing bias in data collection and analysis. Crossover Design: Each participant will receive all four treatment combinations (semaglutide + empagliflozin, semaglutide + placebo, placebo + empagliflozin, placebo + placebo), allowing for within-subject comparisons and reducing inter-individual variability.
Study Procedures:
Screening and Baseline: Participants will undergo a screening visit to confirm eligibility criteria. Baseline characteristics, including demographic data, medical history, and current diabetes management, will be collected. Titration Period (Semaglutide): A 12-week titration period for semaglutide will be implemented to achieve a stable dose and minimize gastrointestinal side effects. This gradual dose escalation will follow standard clinical practice. Intervention Periods (Four Weeks Each): Each participant will undergo four four-week intervention periods, representing the four treatment combinations. During each intervention period, participants will continue to use their AID system.
Participants will receive daily injections (semaglutide or placebo) and daily tablets (empagliflozin or placebo) according to the randomization schedule. Washout Periods: A two to four-week washout period will be implemented between the semaglutide/placebo arms to eliminate any carryover effects of semaglutide. A one to seven-day washout period will be implemented between the empagliflozin/placebo tablet administrations. This short period is considered sufficient for the elimination of empagliflozin. CGM Data Collection:
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data will be collected throughout the study, with a focus on the four-week intervention periods. CGM data will be used to calculate the primary outcome (TIR) and secondary outcomes. Questionnaires: At the end of each four-week intervention period, participants will complete questionnaires to assess: Diabetes distress and treatment satisfaction. Adverse Event Monitoring: Adverse events will be recorded throughout the study, from informed consent to the end of participation.
Statistical Analysis:
Intention-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis: Statistical analyses will be performed on an ITT basis, including all participants who were randomized. Factorial Analysis: The factorial design allows for the assessment of the main effects of semaglutide and empagliflozin, as well as their interaction. Mixed-Effects Models: Mixed-effects models will be used to account for repeated measures and within-subject variability. Descriptive Statistics: Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline characteristics and outcome measures. Adverse Event Analysis: Adverse events will be summarized and analyzed for frequency and severity.
Safety Considerations:
Participants will be closely monitored for adverse events. Rescue medications will be available for hypoglycemic events. Participants will receive education on the safe use of semaglutide, empagliflozin, and the AID system. The investigators will have the right to remove any participant from the study at any time if they feel it is in the best interest of the participant.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide, OzempicĀ® (at maximum tolerated dose) + Automated Insulin Delivery system | Experimental | Semaglutide is a Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist. It stimulates GLP1 in the body, which allows for increased satiety, reduced glucagon levels, delayed gastric emptying, and in some, increased insulin secretion. It is a once per week subcutaneous injection. Participants will self-administer the colourless solution subcutaneously in the abdomen, thighs, or upper arms once weekly per the dosing schedule below. Weeks 1-4 : 0.25 mg (0.19 mL) Weeks 5-8 : 0.50 mg (0.38 mL) Weeks 9-12 : 1.0 mg (0.74 mL) Weeks 13-22 : 1.0 mg (0.74 mL) To match the recommendation from the product monograph and to ensure a steady state is reached before initiating the evaluation period, study drugs will be titrated for 12 weeks. |
|
| Placebo + Automated Insulin Delivery system | Active Comparator | Participants will self-administer the colourless solution subcutaneously in the abdomen, thighs, or upper arms once weekly per the dosing schedule below. Weeks 1-4 : 0.19 mL Weeks 5-8 : 0.38 mL Weeks 9-12 : 0.74 mL Weeks 13-22 : 0.74 mL To match the recommendation from the product monograph and to ensure a steady state is reached before initiating the evaluation period, study drugs will be titrated for 12 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Period 1: Semaglutide + Empagliflozin | Drug | Semaglutide Injection: Subcutaneous injection, titrated over 12 weeks to a stable dose (1 mg), administered weekly. Empagliflozin Tablet: Oral tablet (2.5 mg), administered daily. Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System: Continuous use of the participant's personal commercial AID system. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time-in-Range | The percentage of time spent in target glucose range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L), between Semaglutide and Empagliflozin versus placebo, added to AID therapy. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Time In Range | Percentage of time (%) spent in ranges of glucose levels : between 3.9 to 10 mmol/L Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
Not provided
The inclusion criteria at the time of enrollment are:
The exclusion criteria are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keddy Moise, BScHS | Contact | 438-531-6896 | keddy.moise@affiliate.mcgill.ca | |
| Dr. Ahmad Haidar | Contact | 514-398-4491 | ahmad.haidar@mcgill.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Michael Tsoukas | Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism - McGill University Health Center | Principal Investigator |
| Dr. Melissa-Rosina Pasqua | Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism - McGill University Health Center |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre | Recruiting | Montreal | Quebec | H4A 3J1 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Cohen E, Tsoukas MA, von Oettingen JE, Yale JF, Garfield N, Vallis M, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Alleviate Carbohydrate Counting in Type 1 Diabetes with Automated Fiasp and Pramlintide Closed-Loop Delivery. New Orleans: American Diabetes Association Conference; 2022. | ||
| 35551290 | Background | Haidar A, Lovblom LE, Cardinez N, Gouchie-Provencher N, Orszag A, Tsoukas MA, Falappa CM, Jafar A, Ghanbari M, Eldelekli D, Rutkowski J, Yale JF, Perkins BA. Empagliflozin add-on therapy to closed-loop insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes: a 2 x 2 factorial randomized crossover trial. Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1269-1276. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01805-3. Epub 2022 May 12. | |
| 31177185 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Sizar O, Podder V, Talati R. Empagliflozin. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Accessed April 15, 2024 | View source |
Not provided
Protocol will be included upon finalization onto the website, as well as upon request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
2Ć2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial assessing the effects of Semaglutide and Empagliflozin, individually and combined, added to AID therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Intervention Period 2: Semaglutide + Empagliflozin Placebo | Drug | Semaglutide Injection: Subcutaneous injection, titrated over 12 weeks to a stable dose (1 mg), administered weekly. Empagliflozin Placebo Tablet: Oral placebo tablet, matched in appearance to empagliflozin (2.5 mg), administered daily. Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System: Continuous use of the participant's personal commercial AID system. |
|
| Intervention Period 3: Semaglutide Placebo + Empagliflozin | Drug | Semaglutide Placebo Injection: Subcutaneous placebo injection (titrated over 12 weeks to a stable 1 mg dose), matched in appearance to semaglutide, administered weekly. Empagliflozin Tablet: Oral tablet (2.5 mg), administered daily. Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System: Continuous use of the participant's personal commercial AID system. |
|
| Intervention Period 4: Semaglutide Placebo + Empagliflozin Placebo | Drug | Semaglutide Placebo Injection: Subcutaneous placebo injection (titrated over 12 weeks to a stable 1 mg dose), matched in appearance to semaglutide, administered weekly. Empagliflozin Placebo Tablet: Oral placebo tablet (2.5 mg), matched in appearance to empagliflozin, administered daily. Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System: Continuous use of the participant's personal commercial AID system. |
|
| Optimal Time In Range | Percentage of time (%) spent in ranges of glucose levels : between 3.9 to 7.8 mmol/L Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Time In Hypoglycemia | Percentage of time (%) spent in ranges of glucose levels : below 3.9 and 3.0 mmol/L Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Time In Mild Hyperglycemia | Percentage of time (%) spent in ranges of glucose levels : above 7.8 mmol/L Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Time Above Range | Percentage of time (%) spent in ranges of glucose levels : above 10 mmol/L Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Time In Severe Hyperglycemia | Percentage of time (%) spent in ranges of glucose levels : above 13.9 mmol/L Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Total Insulin dose | Total daily insulin dose (U/l) Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Basal insulin dose | Total daily basal dose (U/l) Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Bolus insulin dose | Total daily bolus dose (U/l) Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Carbohydrate intake | Average daily meal carbohydrate intake (grams/day) Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At days 7, 35, 63 of the titration period and days 3 and 7 of each intervention. |
| Patient-reported outcomes | Average scores (unit) of the questionnaire : - Diabetes Distress Scale Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At the end of each intervention at weeks 16, 21, 29, 34 |
| Patient-reported outcomes | Average scores (unit) of the questionnaire: - Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Nota Bene: Secondary endpoints will be computed for (i) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus placebo, (ii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus empagliflozin alone, (iii) semaglutide and empagliflozin versus semaglutide alone. | At the end of each intervention at weeks 16, 21, 29, 34 |
| Dr. Vanessa Tardio | Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism - McGill University Health Center | Study Director |
| Dr. Ahmad Haidar | Department of Biomedical Engineering - McGill University | Study Director |
| Background |
| Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, Bosi E, Buckingham BA, Cefalu WT, Close KL, Cobelli C, Dassau E, DeVries JH, Donaghue KC, Dovc K, Doyle FJ 3rd, Garg S, Grunberger G, Heller S, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hovorka R, Jia W, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Levine B, Mayorov A, Mathieu C, Murphy HR, Nimri R, Norgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Rodbard D, Saboo B, Schatz D, Stoner K, Urakami T, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8. |
| Background | Bradley C. The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire: DTSQ. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. 1994;111:132. |
| 27118163 | Background | Fisher L, Hessler D, Polonsky W, Strycker L, Masharani U, Peters A. Diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes: Prevalence, incidence and change over time. J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Aug;30(6):1123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Apr 4. |
| Background | Nordisk N. OzempicĀ® Product Monograph. 2017. |
| 30833170 | Background | Zinman B, Bhosekar V, Busch R, Holst I, Ludvik B, Thielke D, Thrasher J, Woo V, Philis-Tsimikas A. Semaglutide once weekly as add-on to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 9): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 May;7(5):356-367. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30066-X. Epub 2019 Mar 1. |
| 25220191 | Background | Eng C, Kramer CK, Zinman B, Retnakaran R. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and basal insulin combination treatment for the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014 Dec 20;384(9961):2228-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61335-0. Epub 2014 Sep 11. |
| 24947583 | Background | de Wit HM, Vervoort GM, Jansen HJ, de Grauw WJ, de Galan BE, Tack CJ. Liraglutide reverses pronounced insulin-associated weight gain, improves glycaemic control and decreases insulin dose in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26 week, randomised clinical trial (ELEGANT). Diabetologia. 2014 Sep;57(9):1812-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3302-0. Epub 2014 Jun 20. |
| 20616619 | Background | Fakhoury WK, Lereun C, Wright D. A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of incretin-based medications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Pharmacology. 2010;86(1):44-57. doi: 10.1159/000314690. Epub 2010 Jul 12. |
| 25388240 | Background | Du Q, Wang YJ, Yang S, Zhao YY, Han P. Liraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Adv Ther. 2014 Nov;31(11):1182-95. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0164-2. Epub 2014 Nov 12. |
| 31696598 | Background | Dejgaard TF, Schmidt S, Frandsen CS, Vistisen D, Madsbad S, Andersen HU, Norgaard K. Liraglutide reduces hyperglycaemia and body weight in overweight, dysregulated insulin-pump-treated patients with type 1 diabetes: The Lira Pump trial-a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Apr;22(4):492-500. doi: 10.1111/dom.13911. Epub 2019 Dec 19. |
| 27493132 | Background | Ahren B, Hirsch IB, Pieber TR, Mathieu C, Gomez-Peralta F, Hansen TK, Philotheou A, Birch S, Christiansen E, Jensen TJ, Buse JB; ADJUNCT TWO Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Added to Capped Insulin Treatment in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes: The ADJUNCT TWO Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Oct;39(10):1693-701. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0690. Epub 2016 Aug 4. |
| 27506222 | Background | Mathieu C, Zinman B, Hemmingsson JU, Woo V, Colman P, Christiansen E, Linder M, Bode B; ADJUNCT ONE Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Added to Insulin Treatment in Type 1 Diabetes: The ADJUNCT ONE Treat-To-Target Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Oct;39(10):1702-10. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0691. Epub 2016 Aug 9. |
| 32135138 | Background | Johansen NJ, Dejgaard TF, Lund A, Schluntz C, Frandsen CS, Forman JL, Wewer Albrechtsen NJ, Holst JJ, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Madsbad S, Vilsboll T, Andersen HU, Knop FK. Efficacy and safety of meal-time administration of short-acting exenatide for glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes (MAG1C): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Apr;8(4):313-324. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30030-9. Epub 2020 Mar 2. |
| 29246950 | Background | Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, Dotta F, Henkel E, Lingvay I, Holst AG, Annett MP, Aroda VR. Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb;41(2):258-266. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0417. Epub 2017 Dec 15. |
| 29397376 | Background | Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, Ludemann J, Andreassen C, Navarria A, Viljoen A; SUSTAIN 7 investigators. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;6(4):275-286. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30024-X. Epub 2018 Feb 1. |
| 31539622 | Background | Capehorn MS, Catarig AM, Furberg JK, Janez A, Price HC, Tadayon S, Verges B, Marre M. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0mg vs once-daily liraglutide 1.2mg as add-on to 1-3 oral antidiabetic drugs in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 10). Diabetes Metab. 2020 Apr;46(2):100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.101117. Epub 2019 Sep 17. |
| 31189511 | Background | Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, Pais P, Probstfield J, Riesmeyer JS, Riddle MC, Ryden L, Xavier D, Atisso CM, Dyal L, Hall S, Rao-Melacini P, Wong G, Avezum A, Basile J, Chung N, Conget I, Cushman WC, Franek E, Hancu N, Hanefeld M, Holt S, Jansky P, Keltai M, Lanas F, Leiter LA, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Cardona Munoz EG, Pirags V, Pogosova N, Raubenheimer PJ, Shaw JE, Sheu WH, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T; REWIND Investigators. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Jul 13;394(10193):121-130. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3. Epub 2019 Jun 9. |
| 28854085 | Background | Mann JFE, Orsted DD, Brown-Frandsen K, Marso SP, Poulter NR, Rasmussen S, Tornoe K, Zinman B, Buse JB; LEADER Steering Committee and Investigators. Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 31;377(9):839-848. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616011. |
| 31159279 | Background | Greco EV, Russo G, Giandalia A, Viazzi F, Pontremoli R, De Cosmo S. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Kidney Protection. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 May 31;55(6):233. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060233. |
| 27633186 | Background | Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jodar E, Leiter LA, Lingvay I, Rosenstock J, Seufert J, Warren ML, Woo V, Hansen O, Holst AG, Pettersson J, Vilsboll T; SUSTAIN-6 Investigators. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1834-1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141. Epub 2016 Sep 15. |
| 27295427 | Background | Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JF, Nauck MA, Nissen SE, Pocock S, Poulter NR, Ravn LS, Steinberg WM, Stockner M, Zinman B, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB; LEADER Steering Committee; LEADER Trial Investigators. Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):311-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827. Epub 2016 Jun 13. |
| 19925391 | Background | Kielgast U, Holst JJ, Madsbad S. Treatment of type 1 diabetic patients with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and GLP-1R agonists. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2009 Nov;5(4):266-75. doi: 10.2174/157339909789804413. |
| 9285204 | Background | Nauck MA, Holst JJ, Willms B, Schmiegel W. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) as a new therapeutic approach for type 2-diabetes. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1997;105(4):187-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1211750. |
| 34989070 | Background | Kobayati A, Haidar A, Tsoukas MA. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as adjunctive treatment for type 1 diabetes: Renewed opportunities through tailored approaches? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 May;24(5):769-787. doi: 10.1111/dom.14637. Epub 2022 Mar 2. |
| 21707956 | Background | Stonehouse AH, Darsow T, Maggs DG. Incretin-based therapies. J Diabetes. 2012 Mar;4(1):55-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2011.00143.x. |
| 31767182 | Background | Muller TD, Finan B, Bloom SR, D'Alessio D, Drucker DJ, Flatt PR, Fritsche A, Gribble F, Grill HJ, Habener JF, Holst JJ, Langhans W, Meier JJ, Nauck MA, Perez-Tilve D, Pocai A, Reimann F, Sandoval DA, Schwartz TW, Seeley RJ, Stemmer K, Tang-Christensen M, Woods SC, DiMarchi RD, Tschop MH. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Mol Metab. 2019 Dec;30:72-130. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Sep 30. |
| 9780839 | Background | Ahren B. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1): a gut hormone of potential interest in the treatment of diabetes. Bioessays. 1998 Aug;20(8):642-51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199808)20:83.0.CO;2-K. |
| 10233049 | Background | Gutzwiller JP, Drewe J, Goke B, Schmidt H, Rohrer B, Lareida J, Beglinger C. Glucagon-like peptide-1 promotes satiety and reduces food intake in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Am J Physiol. 1999 May;276(5):R1541-4. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.276.5.R1541. |
| 36331522 | Background | Pasqua MR, Jafar A, Kobayati A, Tsoukas MA, Haidar A. Low-Dose Empagliflozin as Adjunct to Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Therapy in Adults With Suboptimally Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(1):165-172. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0490. |
| 33528904 | Background | Haidar A, Yale JF, Lovblom LE, Cardinez N, Orszag A, Falappa CM, Gouchie-Provencher N, Tsoukas MA, El Fathi A, Rene J, Eldelekli D, Lanctot SO, Scarr D, Perkins BA. Reducing the need for carbohydrate counting in type 1 diabetes using closed-loop automated insulin delivery (artificial pancreas) and empagliflozin: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, crossover pilot trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jun;23(6):1272-1281. doi: 10.1111/dom.14335. Epub 2021 Feb 28. |
| 30287422 | Background | Rosenstock J, Marquard J, Laffel LM, Neubacher D, Kaspers S, Cherney DZ, Zinman B, Skyler JS, George J, Soleymanlou N, Perkins BA. Empagliflozin as Adjunctive to Insulin Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes: The EASE Trials. Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2560-2569. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1749. Epub 2018 Oct 4. |
| 36942888 | Background | Tsoukas MA, Woo V, Tobe SW, Slee A, Rapattoni W, Ang FG, Seufert J, Neuen BL, Arnott C, Mahaffey KW, Wheeler DC. Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes with canagliflozin according to type 2 diabetes treatment targets at baseline: Data from the CANVAS programme and CREDENCE. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jul;25(7):2038-2042. doi: 10.1111/dom.15057. Epub 2023 Apr 4. No abstract available. |
| 30459245 | Background | Riddle MC, Cefalu WT. SGLT Inhibitors for Type 1 Diabetes: An Obvious Choice or Too Good to Be True? Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2444-2447. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0041. No abstract available. |
| 31334145 | Background | Pradhan A, Vohra S, Vishwakarma P, Sethi R. Review on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in diabetes mellitus and heart failure. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jun;8(6):1855-1862. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_232_19. |
| OzempicĀ® Side Effects \| OzempicĀ® (semaglutide) injection. Accessed April 15, 2024 | View source |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| D007333 | Insulin Resistance |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D006946 | Hyperinsulinism |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C570240 | empagliflozin |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided