Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study to evaluate the effect of postoperative telehealth counseling on patient outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing day surgery.
Hypotheses of the Study H11: In geriatric patients undergoing day surgery, the postoperative self-care power of the intervention group receiving postoperative telehealth counseling is higher than the control group not receiving counseling.
H12: In geriatric patients undergoing day surgery, the postoperative recovery status of the intervention group receiving postoperative telehealth counseling is higher than that of the control group not receiving counseling.
Inclusion Criteria;
Exclusion Criteria;
Data Collection Forms Patient Information Form: The form, prepared by the researchers with the support of the literature, includes a total of twelve questions questioning sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, educational status, marital status, smoking, alcohol use, comorbidity, height, weight, body mass index and surgical experience) and disease-related characteristics (surgical procedure performed) Postoperative Recovery Index (PRAI): TThe index consists of 5 sub-dimensions and 25 items. The sub-dimensions are psychological symptoms, physical activities, general symptoms, bowel symptoms and craving symptoms. When determining the sub-dimension score, the scores of the related items are summed and their arithmetic averages are taken. For the total score, all items are summed and the arithmetic mean is taken. Higher scores on the index reflect more difficulty in postoperative recovery, while lower scores indicate that postoperative recovery is easier. In Cengiz and Aygin's study, the Cronbach's alpha value of the ASIQ was determined as 0.96 (Cengiz, 2018).
Self-Care Power Scale: It was developed by Kearney and Fleischer in 1979. The scale, which is used to determine the ability and power of people to take care of themselves, consists of 35 statements (items). The maximum score is 140. The higher the score obtained from the scale, the higher the self-care or self-care ability and power of the individual. The cronbach alpha value of the scale is 0.92 Data Collection The investigator evaluated the patients admitted to the clinic with the decision of surgery according to the research criteria. The surgery date and intensive care processes of the patients planned to be included were followed. Patients who were visited in the clinic before discharge were verbally informed about the study in face-to-face interviews of 10-15 minutes with the patient's relatives in the room, and informed consent forms were signed. It was reported that the data would be collected by the researcher through face-to-face interviews.
Control Group Practices
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routine care | No Intervention | Patients will only be called weekly to complete the scales. | |
| telehealth counseling application | Experimental | to provide active counseling by calling weekly by phone on issues that the patient needs |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| telehealth counseling | Other | Patients in the intervention group will be called every week (for 4 weeks) and will be trained in line with the determined guide and scales will be filled. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperatıve recovery process | Data collection tools Postoperative Recovery Index (PRAI): The index consists of 5 sub-dimensions and 25 items. The sub-dimensions are psychological symptoms, physical activities, general symptoms, bowel symptoms and craving symptoms. When determining the sub-dimension score, the scores of the related items are summed and their arithmetic averages are taken. For the total score, all items are summed and the arith. Maximum Possible Score: If the scoring system for each item is on a scale (for example, 1 to 5), the maximum score for each sub-dimension would be the sum of the highest possible score for each item within that sub-dimension. The total maximum score is the sum of the maximum scores for all 25 items. If each item can score between 1 and 5, the maximum score per item is 5. Maximum score for 25 items: 5 x 25 = 125 (total score) Minimum Possible Score: The minimum score for each item is 1, so the lowest possible score for each sub-dimension is 25 (1 for each of the 25 ite | postoperative 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th week |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dilek TALHAOĞLU | Contact | +905545911691 | dilektalhaoglu@gmail.com | |
| Serdar Şahin | Contact | serdarsahin@ahievran.edu.tr |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided