Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of intranasal midazolam in newborns and infants born prematurely, undergoing Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) screening.
The main question it aims to answer is:
• Does use of intranasal midazolam is a safe, quick, non-invasive medication, that reduces the pain, stress, discomfort, and other complications in patients undergoing ROP screening?
Researchers will compare the intervention group with a comparison group of the patients who will receive routine comfort care.
The aim of this parallel, prospective, nonblinded randomised control trial is to assess the effectiveness and safety of intranasal midazolam administered before ROP screening using the DARTâ„¢ intranasal atomization device in preterm newborns and infants.
Participants: Preterm newborns and infants eligible for routine ROP screening. Recruitment: Parental/legal guardian consent required before random assignment to either the study or control group.
Study Groups and Randomization:
Random Assignment: Block randomization will be used. • Sample Size: 40 newborns/infants (20 in control, 20 in study group).
Study intervention and monitoring:
• Study Group (midazolam group) Intervention: intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) administered 10 minutes before ROP screening via the DART™ intranasal atomization device.
Comfort Measures:
Monitoring:
Control Group (non-midazolam group)
Monitoring:
In both groups, observations for:
Study Outcome Assessment:
Change in pain and stress symptoms during ROP screening, measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP).
Clinical safety of intranasal midazolam using a nasal atomizer (DARTâ„¢ intranasal atomization device) in newborns/infants.
Assessment of sedation post intranasal midazolam administration.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intranasal midazolam and comfort care | Experimental | The newborn/infant qualified for the ROP screening will receive intranasal midazolam before the procedure using a nasal atomizer. The newborn/infant will also receive comfort care |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | Control Group (non-midazolam group)
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intranasal midazolam administration via the DARTâ„¢ intranasal atomization device along with routine comfort care. | Drug | Intervention: Intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) administered 10 minutes before ROP screening via the DARTâ„¢ intranasal atomization device. Comfort Measures:
Monitoring:
Observations for signs of:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain assessment pre and post intranasal midazolam administration | Primary Endpoint: - Change in the occurrence of pain symptoms and stress associated with screening ophthalmologic examination (ROP). Use of Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score
| PIPP Score Assessment Time Points: 5 minutes before drug administration, during drug administration, 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of clinical safety of intranasal midazolam using a nasal atomizer (DARTâ„¢ intranasal atomisation device) in newborns/infants. | To accurately report the adverse events during intranasal midazolam administration using a nasal atomizer (DARTâ„¢ intranasal atomisation device) in newborns/infants, the Neonatal Adverse Event Severity Scale (NAESS) will be used. This scale contains generic severity criteria that can occur in neonates, followed by a list of 35 specific medical conditions: neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, infectious, general and any other symptoms Each of the criteria is divided into grading system: Grade 1 - Mild Grade 2 - Moderate Grade 3 - Severe Grade 4 - Life- threatening Grade 5 - Death Assessment of the severity of the adverse event is based on the observation of the changes in the following components: age appropriate behavioural changes, changes from the baseline in the vital signs, changes in the required care and monitoring. Only changes from the baseline condition will be considered as a reported adverse-events. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Newborns qualified for ophthalmologic screening examination to detect retinopathy of prematurity (ROP):
a. Newborns/infants born before the 32 weeks of gestation and/or with a birth weight <1500 g.
Obtaining informed consent from a parent/legal guardian.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Nowacka, MSc | Contact | +48 607603226 | agn.nowacka@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ewa Gulczyńska, Professor | Polish Mother's Health Center Institute | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polish Mother's Health Center Institute Rzgowska 281/289, 93-338 Lodz | Lodz | 93-338 | Poland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37745081 | Background | Salaets T, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Hokuto I, Gauldin C, Taha A, Smits A, Thewissen L, Van Horebeek I, Shoraisham A, Mohammad K, Suzuki M, Komachi S, Michels K, Turner MA, Allegaert K, Lewis T. Prospective assessment of inter-rater reliability of a neonatal adverse event severity scale. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 7;14:1237982. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237982. eCollection 2023. | |
| 31537552 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Neonatal Adverse Event Severity Scale (NAESS) will be reported up to 24 hours following drug administration. |
| Sedation assessment after intranasal midazolam administration. | To assess the sedation status after intranasal midazolam administration, Modified N-PASS: Neonatal Sedation Assessment Scale will be used. The assessment criteria of the scale include:
Deep sedation: -10 to -6 Light sedation: -5 to - 2 Normal: -1 to +3 | Modified N-PASS score used to assess level of sedation time points: 5 minutes before drug administration, during drug administration, 10, 30 minutess, 1 hour and 2 hours post - drug administration. |
| Background |
| Salaets T, Turner MA, Short M, Ward RM, Hokuto I, Ariagno RL, Klein A, Beauman S, Wade K, Thomson M, Roberts E, Harrison J, Quinn T, Baer G, Davis J, Allegaert K; International Neonatal Consortium. Development of a neonatal adverse event severity scale through a Delphi consensus approach. Arch Dis Child. 2019 Dec;104(12):1167-1173. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317399. Epub 2019 Sep 19. |
| 33009491 | Background | Morgan ME, Kukora S, Nemshak M, Shuman CJ. Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review. J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1753-1763. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00840-7. Epub 2020 Oct 2. |
| 22704600 | Background | Vinall J, Miller SP, Chau V, Brummelte S, Synnes AR, Grunau RE. Neonatal pain in relation to postnatal growth in infants born very preterm. Pain. 2012 Jul;153(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.007. |
| 26810788 | Background | COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN and SECTION ON ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE. Prevention and Management of Procedural Pain in the Neonate: An Update. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20154271. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4271. Epub 2016 Jan 25. |
| 35231912 | Background | Snyers D, Tribolet S, Rigo V. Intranasal Analgosedation for Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review. Neonatology. 2022;119(3):273-284. doi: 10.1159/000521949. Epub 2022 Mar 1. |
| 12394025 | Background | Pasero C. Pain assessment in infants and young children: Premature Infant Pain Profile. Am J Nurs. 2002 Sep;102(9):105-6. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200209000-00065. No abstract available. |
| 27195471 | Background | Francis K. What Is Best Practice for Providing Pain Relief During Retinopathy of Prematurity Eye Examinations? Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Jun;16(3):220-8. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000267. |
| 10617258 | Background | Ballantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A. Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain. 1999 Dec;15(4):297-303. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199912000-00006. |
| 22374882 | Background | Brummelte S, Grunau RE, Chau V, Poskitt KJ, Brant R, Vinall J, Gover A, Synnes AR, Miller SP. Procedural pain and brain development in premature newborns. Ann Neurol. 2012 Mar;71(3):385-96. doi: 10.1002/ana.22267. Epub 2012 Feb 28. |
| 22123352 | Background | Mitchell AJ, Green A, Jeffs DA, Roberson PK. Physiologic effects of retinopathy of prematurity screening examinations. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Aug;11(4):291-7. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318225a332. |
| 22928523 | Background | Moral-Pumarega MT, Caserio-Carbonero S, De-La-Cruz-Bertolo J, Tejada-Palacios P, Lora-Pablos D, Pallas-Alonso CR. Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 28;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-132. |
| 35703418 | Background | Thirunavukarasu AJ, Hassan R, Savant SV, Hamilton DL. Analgesia for retinopathy of prematurity screening: A systematic review. Pain Pract. 2022 Sep;22(7):642-651. doi: 10.1111/papr.13138. Epub 2022 Jun 27. |
| 9422929 | Background | Slevin M, Murphy JF, Daly L, O'Keefe M. Retinopathy of prematurity screening, stress related responses, the role of nesting. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Sep;81(9):762-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.9.762. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D047928 | Premature Birth |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007752 | Obstetric Labor, Premature |
| D007744 | Obstetric Labor Complications |
| D011248 | Pregnancy Complications |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided