Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Pak Emirates Military Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to learn if mesenchymal stem cell therapy (treatment group) can effectively treat autoimmune diseases, when compared to normal saline (given to placebo group). The primary outcome measures will be clinical improvement based on the respective disease specific clinical scores, normalization of T-lymphocyte subsets and > 50% reduction in disease specific antibody titres. The study will also document the type and frequency of any adverse event or side effects, reported by or seen in any of the trial participants.
Patients in treatment group will receive single session of MSC therapy and placebo group will receive 0.9% saline solution. The participants will be followed at 3 and 6 months.
The autoimmune disorders are a spectrum of diseases ranging from organ-specific, in which antibodies and T cells react to self-antigens localized in a specific tissue, to systemic, which are characterized by reactivity against a specific antigen(s) spread throughout various tissues in the body. The incidence of different autoimmune diseases is variable, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 22.7% have rheumatic diseases. Although no population-based epidemiological study has been carried out in Pakistan purely on autoimmune diseases; a study by Mohsin Z et al. reports the combined prevalence of rheumatic diseases at a tertiary hospital in Karachi to be 17.3%. Autoimmune diseases and their treatment modalities are the prime cause of disability in developing countries and have the highest incapacitating rates in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and daily functioning.
The 21st century has seen rapid advances in the treatment of diseases of immune dysfunction. One such treatment modality is stem cell therapy which is believed to repair and regenerate tissues. In particular, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been applied to treat diseases associated with age, changing lifestyle, immune dysfunction and stroke. MSC therapy has promise to treat various autoimmune disorders like refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Crohn's disease, systemic sclerosis (SS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), multiple sclerosis (MS), graft versus host disease, diabetes mellitus, thyroiditis and even different types of neurological disorders. At present, nearly a thousand clinical trials have used MSC-based therapies. Among those around one hundred trials have been conducted for treatment of immune-mediated disorders, the first one being more than fifteen years ago (table 1).
The interest surrounding field of MSCs was initially based on their inherent capacity for self-renewal and regeneration with a potential to form cells of mesodermal origin (adipocytes, osteocytes, chondrocytes, hepatocytes, neurons, muscle cells and epithelial cells) depending on the surrounding microenvironment. Later on, due to their abilities to home to inflamed areas and exert immunomodulatory effects, therapies with MSCs extended to treatment of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory processes. Multiple studies have also demonstrated that MSCs have intrinsic immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties.
Table 1: Clinical trials in which mesenchymal stem cells are being used as therapeutic modality.
Immune mediated disorder Number of Clinical trials Year of first Clinical trial Reference Graft vs. host disease 49 2004 Inflammatory bowel disease 23 2006 Multiple sclerosis 29 2006 Systemic lupus erythematosus 10 2007 Type I diabetes 26 2008 Primary Sjögren syndrome 1 2009 Type II diabetes 13 2010 Autoimmune hepatitis 2 2011 Ankylosing spondylitis 2 2011 Chronic urticarial 1 2017 Refractory autoimmune thrombocytopenia 1 2019
Source of MSCs MSCs were initially identified in the BM and are commonly isolated by gradient centrifugation to separate nucleated cells, followed by in vitro culture and serial passages. The Mesenchymal and Tissue Stem Cell Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) has designated the term 'multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells' for the plastic-adherent cells found under standard culture conditions. The immunophenotype of these cells as per ISCT criteria is positive for cell-surface markers CD73, CD90 and CD105 and negative for surface CD14 or CD11b, CD45, CD34, CD79 or CD19, and HLA-DR. MSCs have also been obtained from adipose tissue, placenta, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood (UCB), connective tissues of skeletal muscle and dermis,dental tissue, and fetal tissues such as lung and blood. Mobilized peripheral blood cells have also been reported as a source of MScs. Although gene expression studies demonstrate that MSC populations obtained from different tissue sources are highly heterogeneous, their ability to renew, differentiate, and major functional properties, such as regulation of immunological tolerance, wound healing, inflammation and fibrosis, are common to all MSCs.
Translation of MSC knowledge into clinical application Cell therapy indeed appears to be an applicable translational strategy for autoimmune diseases.
In another study, 81 patients with PM/DM were randomly divided into two groups: 44 patients in the control group were individually treated with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants for 6 months, while 37 patients in the transplantation group were injected intravenously with 3.5-5.2 × 107 UC-MSCs. The results of that study showed that the creatine kinase values in both groups were significantly decreased; however, the transplantation group had better results than the control group at several time points, and the lung function was significantly improved in the transplantation group. One patient died after transplantation and no transplantation-related complications occurred. Currently, there are only a few studies investigating PM/DM, and large-scale and randomized clinical studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of MSCT in PM/DM patients, including the risks of tumors and infections, as well as the optimal transplantation dose and schedule.
Since the clinical outcome in case reports and phase I-II trials seem occasionally striking, there exists a dire need to perform structured and preferably controlled multicenter trials and document results in our own population.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment group | Experimental | MSC therapy group |
|
| Placebo group | Placebo Comparator | Placebo (0.9% saline) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesenchymal Stem Cells | Biological | allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells therapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Outcome Measures for RA | Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score- Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Week 48 The DAS28-ESR is a score on a scale (0 to 10) that is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR (mm/hour). Lower score indicates less disease activity. Flares in disease activity are defined as an increase in this score of greater than 1.2 and remission is defined as achieving a DAS28-ESR score of less than 2.6. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Primary Outcome Measures for RA | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count Score at Week 48 Tender Joint Count (TJC) is calculated based on tenderness response of 28 joints. TJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower TJC indicates less joint tenderness. Change from baseline is computed as Week 48 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Primary Outcome Measures for RA | Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 48 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) is calculated based on swelling response of 28 joints. SJC possible values range from 0 to 28. A lower SJC indicates less joint swelling. Change from baseline is computed as Week 48 value minus baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Primary Outcome Measures for RA | Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS) at Week 48 Change from Baseline in PAAP-VAS (0 to 100 millimeters visual analog scale, 0 being no pain and 100 being most severe pain) is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary Outcome Measures for RA | Change From Baseline in the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Health Component Summary Scores (PCS and MCS) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 12,week 24,week48 ] It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores: PCS=physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; MCS=vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For both, 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the baseline value. A positive value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a negative value worsening. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
A- RA
Exclusion Criteria:
• Allergy to methotrexate (MTX)
Inclusion criteria for SLE
Adults aged at least 18 years old
Active musculoskeletal SLE diagnosed by SLICC criteria.
No contraindication to the use of IV methylprednisolone, biosimilar rituximab, or any other required medications such as antipyretics and antihistamines
Willing to use appropriate contraception if at risk of pregnancy
Disease activity that is refractory to hydroxychoroquine and one DMARD, or patients unable to take hydroxychoroquine due to contra-indication or prior toxicity Exclusion criteria for SLE Severe "critical" SLE flare defined as: (i) BILAG 2004 A flare in CNS system; (ii) BILAG 2004 A flare in the renal system; or (iii) any other SLE manifestation requiring more immunosuppression than allowed within the protocol in the physician's opinion
Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
Systemic sclerosis, as defined by American College of Rheumatology (1980) criteria
Disease duration upto 5 years (defined as time from first non-Raynaud phenomenon manifestation)
>/= 15 and \
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Memoona Haider, MBBS, FCPS | National University of Medical Sciences | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre/ National Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (AFBMTC/NIBMT) | Rawalpindi | Pakistan | ||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18468541 | Background | Le Blanc K, Frassoni F, Ball L, Locatelli F, Roelofs H, Lewis I, Lanino E, Sundberg B, Bernardo ME, Remberger M, Dini G, Egeler RM, Bacigalupo A, Fibbe W, Ringden O; Developmental Committee of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study. Lancet. 2008 May 10;371(9624):1579-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60690-X. | |
| 16003373 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Other | 0.9% Saline as placebo |
|
| Primary Outcome Measures for RA |
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity- Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS) at Week 48 Change from Baseline in PtGADA-VAS (0 to 100 mm visual analog scale, 0 being no symptoms and 100 being severe symptoms) is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the Baseline value. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. |
| Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Primary Outcome Measures for RA | Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Patient's Disease Activity- Visual Analog Scale (PhGADA-VAS) at Week 48 | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Primary Outcome Measures for Systemic lupus erythematosus | Proportion of patients achieving BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Primary Outcome Measures for systemic sclerosis | Change From Baseline in Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at Week 48 Skin thickness was assessed by the mRSS. The mRSS was rated with scores ranging from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe skin thickening) across 17 different sites. The total score was the sum of the individual skin scores in the 17 body areas (e.g., face, hands, fingers; proximal area of the arms, distal area of the arms, thorax, abdomen; proximal area of the legs, and distal area of the legs, feet), giving a range of 0-51 units and had been validated for participants with systemic sclerosis (SSc). A negative change from baseline showed improvement. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Primary Outcome Measures for systemic sclerosis | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Primary outcome measures in ankylosing spondlitis | The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve an ASAS 20 Response (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Criteria) ASAS20 response is defined as an improvement of ≥20% and ≥1 units on a scale of 10 in at least three of the four ASAS main domains and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit on a scale of 10 in the remaining domain | Week 16 |
| Primary Outcome Measure for dermatomyositis | Comparison Between the Time to Improvement Between the Two Groups of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy Patients at week 48 ASAS20 response is defined as an improvement of ≥20% and ≥1 units on a scale of 10 in at least three of the four ASAS main domains and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit on a scale of 10 in the remaining domain | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for RA | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Each question is scored 0-3 (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, and 3 = unable to do). In addition, category scores are modified if an aid or device is used, for example, a walker or wheelchair, or help is received from another person in the daily living activities. If an aid or device is used or help is received then a category score of 0 or 1 increases to a category score of 2. A category score of 3 remains a 3 regardless of aids, devices, or help. Scores from each of the 8 categories are totaled. The total score can range from 0 to 24. Change from baseline is computed as the total score at Week 48 minus the baseline total score. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.](streamdown:incomplete-link) | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for RA | Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 48 ESR is a blood test used to monitor therapy in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and reflects acute phase reactant levels. Active disease in RA is defined by an ESR greater than 30 mm/hr. Change from baseline is computed as the value at Week 48 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement | Day 0, Week 12, week 24, week48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SLE | Proportion of patients achieving SLEDAI responder Index (SRI) | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SLE | Number of serious adverse events | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Change From Baseline in Physical Function Assessed by Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (SHAQ-DI) Each VAS item was rated separately (0-100 millimeters [mm]), with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The five items were: 1) intestinal disease, 2) breathing problem, 3) Raynaud syndrome, 4) finger ulcers, and 5) overall disease. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) There are four possible responses for each component: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. The HAQ-DI was the sum of the domain scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (i.e. the average score), with total range of 0 to 3, higher scores showing larger functional limitation. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Change From Baseline in Clinician's Global Assessment The Clinician's Global Assessment evaluated the overall impact of SSc on the participant as assessed by the physician on a VAS with scores ranging from 0 to 100 mm, with higher scores indicating worse disease in terms of severity, damage, or overall disease, but there was no standardization for the scale. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment VAS scale (0 mm to 100 mm), with higher scores indicating worsening disease. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score The endpoint measured was fatigue. On this scale, a numerical increase indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch Scale Each domain was scored on a 5-point scale, the scores of each of the five domains were achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. 5-D scores ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus). | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Change From Baseline in mRSS | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Percentage of Participants who maintained or Improved in mRSS | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count 10 proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) joints, and both knees, were assessed. Joints were classified as not tender = 0 or tender = 1. Observed data was presented for this outcome measure. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measures for SC | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for ALS | The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve an ASAS40 Response ASAS40 response is defined as an improvement of ≥40% and ≥2 units on a scale of 10 in at least three of the four ASAS main domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain | Week 16 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for ALS | The Proportion of Participants Who Achieve an ASAS40 Response | Week 16 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for ALS | Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) Over Time | Week 16 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for ALS | Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an ASAS 5/6 The ASAS 5/6 improvement criteria is an improvement of ≥20% in at least five of all six domains | Week 16 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for ALS | Participants With Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Response The BASDAI or Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index consists of a 0 through 10 scale (0 being no problem and 10 being the worst problem, captured as a continuous VAS), which is used to answer 6 questions pertaining to the 5 major symptoms of AS | Week 16 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for ALS | Change in Short Form (36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Responders (Improvement of >= 2.5 Points) at Week 16 | Week 16 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for ALS | Change in Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Score Over Time The Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) is an instrument to assess health-related quality of life among adult patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. Each statement on the ASQoL is given a score of "1" or "0". A score of "1" is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse QoL. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. Scores can range from 0 (good QoL) to 18 (poor QoL). | Week 16 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for ankylosing spondlitis | The Proportion of Patients Who Achieve an The Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Partial Remission The The Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) partial remission criteria are defined as a value not above 2 units in each of the four main domains on a scale of 10 | Week 16 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for dermatomyositis | Response Rates (Proportion of Improved Patients) The Definition of Improvement for both adult and pediatric patients will be: 3 of any of the 6 core set measures improved by ≥ 20%, with no more than 2 of the core set measures worsening by ≥25% (worsening measure cannot include the MMT) at two consecutive visits. Of note, the MMT could not be one of the worsening measures. | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Secondary Outcome Measure for dermatomyositis | 20% Improvement in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Over Baseline on Two Consecutive Time Points (Muscle is the Primary Organ of Involvement, and MMT is the One Objective Measurement of the Definition of Improvement [DOI]) | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 48 |
| Pak Emirates Military Hospital |
| Rawalpindi |
| Pakistan |
| Background |
| Laflamme MA, Murry CE. Regenerating the heart. Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Jul;23(7):845-56. doi: 10.1038/nbt1117. |
| 31526643 | Background | Viswanathan S, Shi Y, Galipeau J, Krampera M, Leblanc K, Martin I, Nolta J, Phinney DG, Sensebe L. Mesenchymal stem versus stromal cells: International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT(R)) Mesenchymal Stromal Cell committee position statement on nomenclature. Cytotherapy. 2019 Oct;21(10):1019-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 13. |
| 21062128 | Background | Choi YH, Kurtz A, Stamm C. Mesenchymal stem cells for cardiac cell therapy. Hum Gene Ther. 2011 Jan;22(1):3-17. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.211. |
| 17664353 | Background | Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood. 2007 Nov 15;110(10):3499-506. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-069716. Epub 2007 Jul 30. |
| 14576065 | Background | Lee OK, Kuo TK, Chen WM, Lee KD, Hsieh SL, Chen TH. Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood. 2004 Mar 1;103(5):1669-75. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1670. Epub 2003 Oct 23. |
| 3068016 | Background | Owen M, Friedenstein AJ. Stromal stem cells: marrow-derived osteogenic precursors. Ciba Found Symp. 1988;136:42-60. doi: 10.1002/9780470513637.ch4. |
| 31804767 | Background | Kabat M, Bobkov I, Kumar S, Grumet M. Trends in mesenchymal stem cell clinical trials 2004-2018: Is efficacy optimal in a narrow dose range? Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):17-27. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0202. Epub 2019 Dec 5. |
| 19443990 | Background | Mizuno H. Adipose-derived stem cells for tissue repair and regeneration: ten years of research and a literature review. J Nippon Med Sch. 2009 Apr;76(2):56-66. doi: 10.1272/jnms.76.56. |
| 20132054 | Background | Song H, Song BW, Cha MJ, Choi IG, Hwang KC. Modification of mesenchymal stem cells for cardiac regeneration. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Mar;10(3):309-19. doi: 10.1517/14712590903455997. |
| 17901396 | Background | Phinney DG, Prockop DJ. Concise review: mesenchymal stem/multipotent stromal cells: the state of transdifferentiation and modes of tissue repair--current views. Stem Cells. 2007 Nov;25(11):2896-902. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0637. Epub 2007 Sep 27. |
| 21259404 | Background | Choi EW, Shin IS, Lee HW, Park SY, Park JH, Nam MH, Kim JS, Woo SK, Yoon EJ, Kang SK, Ra JC, Youn HY, Hong SH. Transplantation of CTLA4Ig gene-transduced adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduces inflammatory immune response and improves Th1/Th2 balance in experimental autoimmune thyroiditis. J Gene Med. 2011 Jan;13(1):3-16. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1531. |
| 18772313 | Background | Cai L, Johnstone BH, Cook TG, Tan J, Fishbein MC, Chen PS, March KL. IFATS collection: Human adipose tissue-derived stem cells induce angiogenesis and nerve sprouting following myocardial infarction, in conjunction with potent preservation of cardiac function. Stem Cells. 2009 Jan;27(1):230-7. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0273. |
| 17393437 | Background | Augello A, Tasso R, Negrini SM, Cancedda R, Pennesi G. Cell therapy using allogeneic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells prevents tissue damage in collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr;56(4):1175-86. doi: 10.1002/art.22511. |
| 15905186 | Background | Zappia E, Casazza S, Pedemonte E, Benvenuto F, Bonanni I, Gerdoni E, Giunti D, Ceravolo A, Cazzanti F, Frassoni F, Mancardi G, Uccelli A. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis inducing T-cell anergy. Blood. 2005 Sep 1;106(5):1755-61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1496. Epub 2005 May 19. |
| 16873762 | Background | Yanez R, Lamana ML, Garcia-Castro J, Colmenero I, Ramirez M, Bueren JA. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells have in vivo immunosuppressive properties applicable for the control of the graft-versus-host disease. Stem Cells. 2006 Nov;24(11):2582-91. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0228. Epub 2006 Jul 27. |
| 20831449 | Background | Garcia-Gomez I, Elvira G, Zapata AG, Lamana ML, Ramirez M, Castro JG, Arranz MG, Vicente A, Bueren J, Garcia-Olmo D. Mesenchymal stem cells: biological properties and clinical applications. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Oct;10(10):1453-68. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2010.519333. |
| 20415588 | Background | Parekkadan B, Milwid JM. Mesenchymal stem cells as therapeutics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010 Aug 15;12:87-117. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105309. |
| 20727988 | Background | Si YL, Zhao YL, Hao HJ, Fu XB, Han WD. MSCs: Biological characteristics, clinical applications and their outstanding concerns. Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Jan;10(1):93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 19. |
| 30148011 | Background | Mohsin Z, Asghar AA, Faiq A, Khalid I, Ul-Haque I, Rehman S, Ahmed SI, Basalat ST, Aimen A, Shafique S, Hanif A, Iqbal MW, Samad SA, Siddiqui F, Hameed I, Safri M. Prevalence of Rheumatic Diseases in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Karachi. Cureus. 2018 Jun 22;10(6):e2858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2858. |
| 12848952 | Background | Cooper GS, Stroehla BC. The epidemiology of autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2003 May;2(3):119-25. doi: 10.1016/s1568-9972(03)00006-5. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| D008180 | Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic |
| D012595 | Scleroderma, Systemic |
| D013167 | Spondylitis, Ankylosing |
| D001171 | Arthritis, Juvenile |
| D003882 | Dermatomyositis |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D000089183 | Axial Spondyloarthritis |
| D025242 | Spondylarthropathies |
| D025241 | Spondylarthritis |
| D013166 | Spondylitis |
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D000844 | Ankylosis |
| D017285 | Polymyositis |
| D009220 | Myositis |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided