Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-A00206-41 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes a variety of sensory-motor deficits and neuropsychological consequences. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reveals a reduction in the volume of the somato-sensory and motor cortices, as well as atrophy in the white matter bundles. In addition, disturbances in cerebral activity are observed in several areas, notably the motor cortex and the prefrontal cortex. The aim of this study is to understand the evolution of brain function after SCI in comparison with a control group of healthy volunteers.
We distinguish between patients with incomplete sensorimotor deficits (ASIA B,C,D) and complete sensorimotor deficits (ASIA A).
Both patient groups will have a multimodal assessment at 1 week, 3 months and 12 months after SCI with MRI and neuropsychological tests.
The group of healthy volunteers will only perform one MRI.
Lesions of the spinal cord induce sensory-motor deficits and have various neuropsychological effects. MRI shows a reduction in the volume of the somatosensory and motor cortices, as well as atrophy of the white matter bundles.
Disturbances in brain activity are observed in several critical areas. Patients may experience cognitive impairment and an increased risk of depression and anxiety. Although deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation have shown positive effects, the efficacy of these treatments remains limited, partly due to insufficient understanding of post-SCI brain changes.
The cognitive and behavioral consequences of spinal cord injury are poorly understood and mainly treated by symptomatic therapies, which are often ineffective and may have side effects.
A better understanding of brain networks and their plasticity after spinal cord injury could facilitate the development of targeted therapies, such as cortical or deep basal ganglia stimulation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients spinal cord injury with incomplete sensorimotor deficits ( ASIA B, C, D) and with complete | Experimental | Experimental: Patients spinal cord injury with incomplete sensorimotor deficits (ASIA B, C, D) and with complete sensorimotor deficits (ASIA A) |
|
| Healthy control group | Active Comparator | MRI : anatomical (3DT1, 3D-FLAIR), functional (task-based and resting-state) and tractographic (multiband diffusion imaging). MRI will be done once for the healthy volunteer control group. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI | Diagnostic Test | MRI : anatomical (3DT1, 3D-FLAIR), functional (task-based and resting-state) and tractographic (multiband diffusion imaging) at three time points: one week, three months and twelve months after the spinal cord injury (SCI) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensory-motor and cognitive-behavioural impact at supra-spinal level on multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) | The difference in task-based functional supraspinal activation pattern evolution (delta beta, GLM) between patient groups (ASIA B,C,D vs. ASIA E) quantified by the students T-score (corrected for multiple comparison) that is associated to the variability of blood flow between the active (participant performs a task in the MRI) and resting (participant is at rest in the MRI) periods. The activity pattern is described by the size (number of voxels) and localization of activated regions. | From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cortical volume in mm3 | Cortical volume in mm3 | From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months |
| Difference in evolution of functional motor patterns | The difference in task-based functional supraspinal activation pattern evolution (delta beta, GLM) between patients and healthy controls quantified by the students T-score (corrected for multiple comparison) that is associated to the variability of blood flow between the active (participant performs a task in the MRI) and resting (participant is at rest in the MRI) periods. The activity pattern is described by the size (number of voxels) and localization of activated regions. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POULEN Gaëtan, Principal Investigator | Contact | +33 04 67 33 72 62 | g-poulen@chu-montpellier.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Montpellier | Montpellier | 34000 | France |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009483 | Neuropsychological Tests |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011581 | Psychological Tests |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Neuropsychological tests | Behavioral | The following tests will be performed: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS), the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) |
|
| From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months |
| Montreal Cognitive Assessment score | The correlation, Pearsons r, between functional activity pattern changes (beta, GLM) and cognitive task performance (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score) | From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months |
| Difference in local resting-state connectivity (ALFF) between groups, quantified by the student T-score (corrected for multiple comparisons) | Difference in local resting-state connectivity (ALFF) between groups, quantified by the student T-score (corrected for multiple comparisons) | From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months |
| Difference in local resting-state connectivity (ReHo) between groups, quantified by the student T-score (corrected for multiple comparisons) | Difference in local resting-state connectivity (ReHo) between groups, quantified by the student T-score (corrected for multiple comparisons) | From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months |
| Difference in global resting-state connectivity (global efficiency - theory des graphs) between groups, quantified by the student T-score (corrected for multiple comparisons). | Difference in global resting-state connectivity (global efficiency - theory des graphs) between groups, quantified by the student T-score (corrected for multiple comparisons). | From enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months |
| Difference in anatomical connectivity | Difference in anatomical connectivity (using the fractional anisotropy) between groups, quantified by the student T-score (corrected for multiple comparisons). | From inclusion to the last study visit at 12 months |
| Measurement of cognitive-behavioral performance by MoCA test | The Monreal Cognitive Assessment tes( MoCA) is a validated cognition test for the early detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). It assesses memory, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, attention, language and orientation. The score is comprised between 0 and 30. A score superior or equal to 26 is normal | From inclusion to the last study visit at 12 months |
| Measurement of quality of life by SF-36 | The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey is a widely used, patient self-administered generic measure created to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the general population. Each item is scored between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better quality of life. | From inclusion to the last study visit at 12 months |
| Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | The BDI comprises 21 symptom and attitude items (a short version with 13 items exists), describing a specific behavioral manifestation of depression, graded from 0 to 3 by a series of 4 statements reflecting the degree of severity of the symptom. The score is comprised between 0 to 63. A high score means more severe depression | From inclusion to the last study visit at 12 months |
| MADRS: Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale | The MADRS scale is widely used to measure changes brought about by treatment for depression. It assesses the severity of symptoms in a wide range of areas, including mood, sleep and appetite, physical and psychological fatigue, and suicidal ideation. The score is comprised between 0 to 60. A score of 30 and more is associated to severe depression | From inclusion to the last study visit at 12 months |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |