Intrathecal Morphine Versus Epidural Analgesia for Laparoscopic Colon Surgery

Intrathecal Morphine Versus Epidural Analgesia for Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Effective pain management after abdominal surgery is essential for recovery. This study compares two pain relief methods-intrathecal morphine (a single spinal injection) and continuous epidural analgesia-for patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.

The investigators expect intrathecal morphine to provide better pain relief at rest 24 hours after surgery, while epidural analgesia may be more effective during movement. By 48 to 72 hours, both methods should offer similar pain control. The epidural group may require fewer additional pain medications but could experience more side effects, including a higher risk of low blood pressure and technical difficulties. Additionally, these patients may have a slightly longer hospital stay. In contrast, the intrathecal morphine group may have fewer overall side effects. Despite these differences, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and recovery are expected to be similar in both groups.

By evaluating these methods, this study aims to determine the most effective and safe approach to post-surgical pain management, improving comfort and recovery outcomes for patients.

Participants of this study will be randomly selected adult patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection who fulfill the inclusion criteria and sign the informed consent for participation.

This sample represents the population of adult patients with colorectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery by ERAS protocol in a tertiary hospital of a high-developed country.

Patients will be randomly divided into Epidural group (E group) or Spinal group (S group) and will receive different intraoperative and postoperative analgesia plans.

E group will be treated as a control group. Patients in S group will receive intrathecal morphine as analgesia for colorectal resection and it will be treated as experimental group.

Anesthesia induction and maintenance will be the same in both groups. The primary outcome is pain intensity at rest measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain) 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcome measures are analgesic consumption, time to rescue analgesia, patient satisfaction, quality of sleep, length of hospital stay, time to return of bowel function, and adverse events (such as respiratory depression, nausea or vomiting, hypotension and bradycardia).

Postoperative continuous epidural analgesia in the E group will consist of 2 μg/mL fentanyl added to 0.1 % levobupivacaine at the rate 5-8 mL/h during the first 24 hours after surgery.

Additional epidural boluses will be allowed by the nursing staff for pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)≥4.

Both groups will receive standard multimodal analgesic protocol with the goal of postoperative pain NRS<4: intravenous (iv) paracetamol 1 g up to 4 times per day and iv metamizole 2.5 g up to 2 times per day and tramadol 50-100 mg iv as needed. In the control group, epidural analgesia will be used for postoperative pain relief for up to 24 h. An algorithm of postoperative rescue analgesia is established for each group.

Rescue antiemetics will be given in case of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV): metoclopramide 10 mg iv up to 3 times per day and granisetron 1 mg iv up to 3 times per day.

Severe pruritus will be treated with antihistamines or naloxone 40 mcg iv.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male or female patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery aged 18-80 years, ASA classification I-III, Body Mass Index (BMI) 15-35 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria:

• abnormal coagulation function, defined as prothrombin time or activated partial prothrombin time above standard laboratory values or an international normalised ratio (INR) ≥1.4; or receiving ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation,
• thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count <80×10 9 L-1,
• pre-existing skin infection at the neuraxial anesthesia puncture site,
• pre-existing neurologic deficit, including peripheral neuropathy,
• patients with dementia or other medical condition that includes communication difficulties,
• patients with bradycardia (pulse <50/min) or with conduction block (2nd or 3rd degree)
• history of opioid abuse,
• allergies to any of the drugs used in the study.

Additionally, patients converted from laparoscopy to laparotomy due to technical surgical issues, patients with postoperative surgical complications (need for revision) or if epidural catheter placement/spinal anesthesia is unsuccessful even after an attempt by a senior anesthesiologist will also be excluded.