Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| W81XWH-21-9-0011.012 | Other Grant/Funding Number | U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command | |
| W81XWH-20-2-0014 | Other Grant/Funding Number | The Department of Defense's Office of Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity | FED |
| U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command | FED |
| University of Florida | OTHER |
| San Diego State University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sexual assault and alcohol misuse are interrelated, persist at high rates in military populations, and carry negative consequences for military units and personnel. Combining tailored efforts to prevent sexual assault and alcohol misuse is critical for developing a more effective Force. This study will test the cross-cutting immediate and long-term outcomes of two programs, the Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) sexual assault prevention program and the eCHECKUP TO GO alcohol misuse prevention program, delivered separately and in combination, with Cadets at the United States Air Force Academy. Anonymous Cadet self-report data will be collected before training (pre-test), immediately after training (post-test), 3 months after training (Fall semester follow-up), and 9 months after training (Spring semester follow-up).
Sexual assault and alcohol misuse both persist at high rates among military populations. These behaviors interfere with readiness, unit cohesion, mission objectives, and personnel performance and retention. There are demonstrated associations between sexual assault and alcohol misuse for both perpetrators and victims of sexual assault. Therefore, combining efforts to prevent sexual assault and alcohol misuse is critical for more effective and efficient programming. Moreover, tailored prevention programming that addresses individual risks and experiences related to sexual assault and alcohol misuse is likely to be the most effective programming. Unfortunately, to date, no evidence-based cross-cutting interventions have been developed and evaluated for impacts on both sexual assault and alcohol misuse among military populations. Several challenges impede this effort. Sexual assault prevention and alcohol misuse prevention are typically managed in different organizations within military settings, including within Military Service Academies. Training settings face many competing demands for trainees' time and instructor capacity, and instructors' ability to provide both sexual assault-related and alcohol-related training varies widely. Despite the promise of tailored training, individualized programming also presents feasibility challenges in group education settings common to military training. In alignment with the Fiscal Years 2021-2025 Department of Defense (DoD) Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Research Agenda and DoD's desire to have cross-cutting prevention programs that reduce risk for multiple harmful behaviors, the long-term goal of the proposed work is to address these challenges and provide the military with flexible, engaging, tailored prevention programming that reduces sexual assault and alcohol misuse while minimizing burden on Service members and training settings. To that end, the basic objective of this study is to test the cross-cutting immediate and long-term outcomes of two programs, the Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) sexual assault prevention program and the eCHECKUP TO GO alcohol misuse prevention program, delivered separately and in combination, with Cadets at the United States Air Force Academy. Anonymous Cadet self-report data will be collected before training (pre-test), immediately after training (post-test), 3 months after training (Fall semester follow-up), and 9 months after training (Spring semester follow-up).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Active Comparator | TAU without SCC or eCHECKUP TO GO |
|
| TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Experimental | TAU with eCHECKUP TO GO (without SCC) |
|
| SCC | Experimental | SCC without TAU or eCHECKUP TO GO |
|
| SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | Experimental | SCC with eCHECKUP TO GO (without TAU) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Behavioral | SCC combines universal classroom instruction with tailored web-based content. Based on sociodemographic characteristics and prior sexual assault experiences, Cadets receive tailored content that addresses either primary victimization prevention, revictimization prevention, or healthy relationships and bystander intervention promotion. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | Participants self-report whether they experienced any type of unwanted sexual contact between Basic Cadet Training and the Spring semester follow-up using a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey. | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
| Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | Participants self-report whether they perpetrated any type of unwanted sexual contact between Basic Cadet Training and the Spring semester follow-up using a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey. | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
| Self-reported Alcohol Use | Participants self-report the approximate number of alcoholic drinks they consumed each day of the week during a typical week over the past month (assessed at both the Fall and Spring semester follow-up assessments). Participants who respond with any weekly value greater than 0 alcoholic drinks at either the Fall or Spring semester follow-up are coded as positive for any alcohol use. | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of Sexual Assault | The percentage of correct participant responses to 8 true-or-false questions about sexual assault. | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
| Knowledge of Effective Consent |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marni L Kan, PhD | RTI International | Principal Investigator |
| Nichole M Scaglione, PhD | University of Florida | Principal Investigator |
| Emily A Schmied, PhD | San Diego State University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States Air Force Academy | Air Force Academy | Colorado | 80840 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38874411 | Background | Goldstein SJ, Scaglione NM, Kan ML, Grimes KEL, Lane ME, Morgan JK, Martin SL. Accuracy, Acceptability, and Burden of an Integrated Screening Approach to Facilitate the Delivery of Tailored Sexual Assault Prevention in the U.S. Air Force. J Child Sex Abus. 2025 Jul-Aug;34(5-6):661-681. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2024.2364792. Epub 2024 Jun 14. | |
| 36383404 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Training as usual (TAU) | TAU without SCC or eCHECKUP TO GO Training as usual (TAU): TAU involves universal classroom instruction focused on developing knowledge, attitudes, and skills to promote personal resilience, increase potential for success, and develop healthy and rewarding personal relationships. |
| FG001 | TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | TAU with eCHECKUP TO GO (without SCC) Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO (eCHECKUP TO GO): eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized, online intervention designed to reduce cognitive risk factors for alcohol misuse. eCHECKUP TO GO is brief, self-guided, and provides individualized feedback based on a user's self-reported alcohol use patterns and consequences. Training as usual (TAU): TAU involves universal classroom instruction focused on developing knowledge, attitudes, and skills to promote personal resilience, increase potential for success, and develop healthy and rewarding personal relationships. |
| FG002 | Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | SCC without TAU or eCHECKUP TO GO Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC): SCC combines universal classroom instruction with tailored web-based content. Based on sociodemographic characteristics and prior sexual assault experiences, Cadets receive tailored content that addresses either primary victimization prevention, revictimization prevention, or healthy relationships and bystander intervention promotion. |
| FG003 | SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | SCC with eCHECKUP TO GO (without TAU) Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC): SCC combines universal classroom instruction with tailored web-based content. Based on sociodemographic characteristics and prior sexual assault experiences, Cadets receive tailored content that addresses either primary victimization prevention, revictimization prevention, or healthy relationships and bystander intervention promotion. Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO (eCHECKUP TO GO): eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized, online intervention designed to reduce cognitive risk factors for alcohol misuse. eCHECKUP TO GO is brief, self-guided, and provides individualized feedback based on a user's self-reported alcohol use patterns and consequences. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Training as Usual (TAU) | TAU without SCC or eCHECKUP TO GO |
| BG001 | TAU Plus eCHECKUP TO GO | TAU with eCHECKUP TO GO (without SCC) |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | Participants self-report whether they experienced any type of unwanted sexual contact between Basic Cadet Training and the Spring semester follow-up using a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey. | The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
|
10 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Training as usual (TAU) | TAU without SCC or eCHECKUP TO GO Training as usual (TAU): TAU involves universal classroom instruction focused on developing knowledge, attitudes, and skills to promote personal resilience, increase potential for success, and develop healthy and rewarding personal relationships. |
Not provided
Not provided
Follow-up survey participation rates were low across all arms, therefore statistical analyses involving follow-up data were not performed.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marni Kan, PhD | RTI International | 919-248-1836 | mkan@rti.org |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 28, 2025 | Mar 28, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D032962 | Consent Forms |
| D000431 | Ethanol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007258 | Informed Consent |
| D007603 | Jurisprudence |
| D012926 | Social Control, Formal |
| D004472 | Health Care Economics and Organizations |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| United States Department of Defense | FED |
Quasi-experimental trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO (eCHECKUP TO GO) | Behavioral | eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized, online intervention designed to reduce cognitive risk factors for alcohol misuse. eCHECKUP TO GO is brief, self-guided, and provides individualized feedback based on a user's self-reported alcohol use patterns and consequences. |
|
| Training as usual (TAU) | Behavioral | TAU involves universal classroom instruction focused on developing knowledge, attitudes, and skills to promote personal resilience, increase potential for success, and develop healthy and rewarding personal relationships. |
|
The percentage of correct participant responses to 7 true-or-false questions about effective sexual consent.
| From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
| Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | A subset of participants rate their degree of confidence in their ability to use certain protective strategies in 6 specific high-risk situations. Scale scores range 6 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
| Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Participants report how many days in the week they estimate the average Cadet of their same age and gender drinks and how many drinks the average Cadet of their same age and gender consumes per day using a modified version of the Quantity/Frequency/Peak questionnaire. The average number of estimated drinks consumed per drinking day is computed from this data and has a possible score range of 0 drinks to 6 drinks. | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
| Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Participants self-report their readiness to change their drinking behavior using a single item. The possible item score ranges 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater readiness to change. | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
| Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | Participants self-report the degree to which they engaged in behavioral strategies to reduce sexual assault risk using the Dating Self-Protection Against Rape Scale. Scores range 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in dating-related protective behavioral strategies. | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
| Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | Participants self-report the degree to which they engaged in behavioral strategies to reduce alcohol-related harms using an adapted version of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey. Scores range 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in alcohol-related protective strategies. | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
| Eckhoff R, Boyce M, Watkins RL, Kan M, Scaglione N, Pound L, Root M. Examining the Use of Mobile Technology to Deliver Tailored Sexual Assault Prevention in a Classroom Environment in the Military: Development and Usability Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Nov 16;10(11):e41455. doi: 10.2196/41455. |
| 39574150 | Background | Kan ML, Scaglione NM, Buben A, Morgan JK, Grimes KEL, Watson CJ, Charm S, Lowe AN, Eckhoff RP, Lane M, Root MK, Pound LB. Feasibility and acceptability of tailored sexual assault prevention in the US Air Force. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Nov 21;10(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01565-6. |
| BG002 | Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Sexual Communication and Consent without TAU or eCHECKUP TO GO |
| BG003 | SCC Plus eCHECKUP TO GO | SCC with eCHECKUP TO GO (without TAU) |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Self-reported Sexual Assault Victimization | Participants self-report whether they experienced any type of unwanted sexual contact prior to arriving at USAFA to begin Basic Cadet Training. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | Participants self-report whether they perpetrated any type of unwanted sexual contact prior to arriving at USAFA to begin Basic Cadet Training. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Self-reported Alcohol Use | Participants self-report the approximate number of alcoholic drinks they consumed each day of the week during a typical week over the past month. Participants who respond with any weekly value greater than 0 alcoholic drinks at either the Fall or Spring semester follow-up are coded as positive for any alcohol use. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
TAU with eCHECKUP TO GO (without SCC)
| OG002 | Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | Sexual Communication and Consent without TAU or eCHECKUP TO GO |
| OG003 | SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | SCC with eCHECKUP TO GO (without TAU) |
|
|
| Primary | Self-reported Sexual Assault Perpetration | Participants self-report whether they perpetrated any type of unwanted sexual contact between Basic Cadet Training and the Spring semester follow-up using a modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey. | The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Self-reported Alcohol Use | Participants self-report the approximate number of alcoholic drinks they consumed each day of the week during a typical week over the past month (assessed at both the Fall and Spring semester follow-up assessments). Participants who respond with any weekly value greater than 0 alcoholic drinks at either the Fall or Spring semester follow-up are coded as positive for any alcohol use. | The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Knowledge of Sexual Assault | The percentage of correct participant responses to 8 true-or-false questions about sexual assault. | The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of correct responses | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Knowledge of Effective Consent | The percentage of correct participant responses to 7 true-or-false questions about effective sexual consent. | The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of correct responses | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Self-efficacy to Resist Unwanted Sexual Advances | A subset of participants rate their degree of confidence in their ability to use certain protective strategies in 6 specific high-risk situations. Scale scores range 6 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. | The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Normative Perceptions of Peer Alcohol Use | Participants report how many days in the week they estimate the average Cadet of their same age and gender drinks and how many drinks the average Cadet of their same age and gender consumes per day using a modified version of the Quantity/Frequency/Peak questionnaire. The average number of estimated drinks consumed per drinking day is computed from this data and has a possible score range of 0 drinks to 6 drinks. | The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Readiness to Change Alcohol Use Behavior | Participants self-report their readiness to change their drinking behavior using a single item. The possible item score ranges 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater readiness to change. | The number analyzed at post-test differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided post-test data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | From pre-test to post-test, an average of 1 month |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Dating-related Protective Strategy Use | Participants self-report the degree to which they engaged in behavioral strategies to reduce sexual assault risk using the Dating Self-Protection Against Rape Scale. Scores range 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in dating-related protective behavioral strategies. | The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Alcohol-related Protective Strategy Use | Participants self-report the degree to which they engaged in behavioral strategies to reduce alcohol-related harms using an adapted version of the Protective Behavioral Strategies Survey. Scores range 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in alcohol-related protective strategies. | The number analyzed at follow-up differs from the overall number analyzed because not all participants who provided pre-test data provided follow-up data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | From pre-test to Spring semester follow-up, an average of 10 months |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 556 |
| 0 |
| 556 |
| 0 |
| 556 |
| EG001 | TAU plus eCHECKUP TO GO | TAU with eCHECKUP TO GO (without SCC) Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO (eCHECKUP TO GO): eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized, online intervention designed to reduce cognitive risk factors for alcohol misuse. eCHECKUP TO GO is brief, self-guided, and provides individualized feedback based on a user's self-reported alcohol use patterns and consequences. Training as usual (TAU): TAU involves universal classroom instruction focused on developing knowledge, attitudes, and skills to promote personal resilience, increase potential for success, and develop healthy and rewarding personal relationships. | 0 | 401 | 0 | 401 | 0 | 401 |
| EG002 | Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) | SCC without TAU or eCHECKUP TO GO Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC): SCC combines universal classroom instruction with tailored web-based content. Based on sociodemographic characteristics and prior sexual assault experiences, Cadets receive tailored content that addresses either primary victimization prevention, revictimization prevention, or healthy relationships and bystander intervention promotion. | 0 | 632 | 0 | 632 | 0 | 632 |
| EG003 | SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO | SCC with eCHECKUP TO GO (without TAU) Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC): SCC combines universal classroom instruction with tailored web-based content. Based on sociodemographic characteristics and prior sexual assault experiences, Cadets receive tailored content that addresses either primary victimization prevention, revictimization prevention, or healthy relationships and bystander intervention promotion. Alcohol eCHECKUP TO GO (eCHECKUP TO GO): eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized, online intervention designed to reduce cognitive risk factors for alcohol misuse. eCHECKUP TO GO is brief, self-guided, and provides individualized feedback based on a user's self-reported alcohol use patterns and consequences. | 0 | 396 | 0 | 396 | 0 | 396 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D011996 | Records |
| D009934 | Organization and Administration |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
| 9-month follow-up |
|
|
|
| 9-month follow-up |
|
|
|
| Posttest value |
|
|
| 0.041 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -2.16 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 1.05 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -4.22 |
| -0.09 |
The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis | <0.0001 | Mean Difference (Net) | -8.51 | Standard Error of the Mean | 1.15 | 2-Sided | 95 | -10.76 | -6.25 | Covariates included cohort and history of peer victimization. | Superiority | The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. |
|
| Posttest value |
|
|
| 0.54 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -0.34 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 0.56 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.44 |
| 0.76 |
The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis | 0.023 | Mean Difference (Net) | -1.40 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.61 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.60 | -0.19 | Superiority |
|
| Posttest value |
|
|
| 0.012 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -1.74 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 0.69 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -3.09 |
| -0.39 |
The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis | 0.0008 | Median Difference (Net) | -2.45 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.73 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.88 | -1.03 | The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. | Superiority |
|
| Posttest value |
|
|
| 0.046 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -0.54 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 0.27 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.07 |
| -0.01 |
The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis | 0.097 | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.48 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.29 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.06 | 0.09 | The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. | Superiority |
|
| Posttest value |
|
|
| 0.25 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 0.12 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 0.11 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.09 |
| 0.33 |
The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis | 0.033 | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.24 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.11 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.47 | -0.02 | The SCC plus eCHECKUP TO GO arm was the reference group. | Superiority |
|
| 9-month follow-up |
|
|
|
| 9-month follow-up |
|
|