Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-513064-26-00 | EU Trial (CTIS) Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Clinsearch GmbH | UNKNOWN |
| CRM Biometrics GmbH | INDUSTRY |
| SocraTec R&D GmbH | OTHER |
| SocraMetrics GmbH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is an open-label, multi-centric clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TK-254RX in patients with contusions. The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety of TK-254RX. Secondly objective is to evaluate the efficacy of contusions and adhesion of TK-254RX.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TK-254RX | Experimental | Esflurbiprofen Topical System 165 mg Esflurbiprofen |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esflurbiprofen Topical System (EFTS) | Drug | One EFTS is applied to the injured area over 7 days |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recording adverse event and serious adverse event | Characterization of occurence of adverse events or serious adverse events of TK-254RX | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score on pain-on-movement (POM) | VAS score from no pain (0 mm) to worst pain (100 mm) on POM by a patient at each time point | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score on pain-at-rest (PAR) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
significant concomitant injury in association with the index soft- tissue injury/contusion; e.g. fracture, nerve injury, ligament disruption, tear of muscle or cartilage, or open wound
excessively hairy skin at application site, cutting the hair in the injured site prior to patch application will qualify for inclusion
current skin disorder or shaving hair at application site
history of excessive sweating/hyperhidrosis inclusive of application site
intake of NSAIDs or analgesics within 36 hours, opioids within 7 days, or corticosteroids (except inhaled corticosteroids for e.g. topical treatment of bronchial asthma) within 60 days of inclusion in the study
intake of long-acting NSAIDs or application of topical medication since the injury
participation in a clinical study within 30 days before inclusion in the study or concomitantly
participation in this clinical study in another center
drug or alcohol abuse in the opinion of the Investigator
pregnant and lactating women
women of child-bearing potential (defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant) who are not using an acceptable method of contraception defined as:
known hypersensitivity to Esflurbiprofen, R-flurbiprofen or one of the excipients of the patch
patients with any ongoing condition that may interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of Esflurbiprofen
history of previous significant injury to the same area within 6 months
patients with a disease affecting the same area such as synovitis, rheumatoid arthritis, arthrosis, etc.
patients having an ongoing painful condition associated with blunt injury/contusion
patients suffering from symptoms of an infectious disease including swelling of any joint of the affected area
patients who had surgery of the affected area within one year of study entry
patients with significant diseases (defined as a disease which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study; includes patients with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, significant cardiovascular, liver or renal disease)
patients with a blood coagulation disorder
patients who use any impermissible medication
known allergy to paracetamol and galenic components of the rescue medication
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kenichi Nishiyama | Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Practice Ebert | Siemensstr | Bonn | 53121 | Germany | ||
| Medical Practice Prof. Predel |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003288 | Contusions |
| D014949 | Wounds, Nonpenetrating |
| D017695 | Soft Tissue Injuries |
| D001265 | Athletic Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| INDUSTRY |
| HWI pharma services GmbH | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
VAS score from no pain (0 mm) to worst pain (100 mm) on PAR (at least 5 minutes rest) by a patient at each time point
| Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) on pain-on-movement (POM) | Calculating the area under the curve for the difference of each pain intensity score by 100-mm-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on movement from the baseline over day 1 to day 8 | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) on pain-at-rest (PAR) | Calculating the area under the curve for the difference of each pain intensity score by 100-mm-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest from the baseline over day 1 to day 8 | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Pain Intensity Difference (PID) on pain-on movement (POM) | Difference of each pain intensity score by VAS on POM from the baseline at each time point | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Pain Intensity Difference (PID) on pain-at-rest (PAR) | Difference of each pain intensity score by VAS on PAR form the baseline at each time point | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Time to meaningful/optimal reduction | Time to meaningful/optimal reduction of pain defined as first at least 30% (meaningful) and 50% (optimal) reduction from baseline of VAS on POM | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Time to complete resolution |
| Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Responder rate 1 | Responder rate is defined as the number of patients achieving at least 50% reduction from baseline in the VAS scores for POM at 48 hours | Day 3 |
| Responder rate 2 | number of patients able to resume training / normal physical activity by 168 hours | Day 8 |
| Resolution of contusion | The percentage of patients who showed POM=PAR=0 at 168 hours | Day 8 |
| Global efficacy assessments 1 by investigator | The global efficacy assessments are evaluated by the investigator as the response to the following questions: "Considering how this treatment has affected the patient since he/she started in the study, how well is he/she doing?" It is assessed on the following 5-point Likert scale: 0 = very good, 1 = good, 2 = fair, 3 = poor, 4 = very poor. | Day 3, Day 4 and Day 8 |
| Global efficacy assessments 2 by investigator | The global efficacy assessments are evaluated by the investigator as the response to the following questions: "How would you rate this medication for the treatment of this contution?" It is assessed on the following 5-point Likert scale: 0 = excellent, 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = moderate, 4 = poor. | Day 3, Day 4 and Day 8 |
| Global efficacy assessments 1 by patients | The global efficacy assessments are evaluated by the patients as the response to the following questions: "Considering how this treatment has affected you since you started in the study, how well are you doing?" It is assessed on the following 5-point Likert scale: 0 = very good, 1 = good, 2 = fair, 3 = poor, 4 = very poor. | Day 3, Day 4 and Day 8 |
| Global efficacy assessments 2 by patients | The global efficacy assessments are evaluated by the patients as the response to the following questions: "How do you rate this medication as a treatment for your contusion?" It is assessed on the following 5-point Likert scale: 0 = excellent, 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor. | Day 3, Day 4 and Day 8 |
| Characterization of local tolerability | Assessing the local tolerability by using the 8-point dermal response (0: No evidence of irritation, 1: Minimal erythema, barely perceptible, 2: Definite erythema, readily visible, minimal edema or minimal papular response, 3: Erythema and papules, 4: Definite edema, 5: Erythema, edema, and papules, 6: Vesicular eruption, 7: Strong reaction spreading beyond test site) and other effects score (0: No other effect detected, A(0): Slightly glazed appearance, B(1): Markedly glazed appearance, C(2): Glazing with peeling and cracking, F(3): Glazing with fissures, G(3): Film of dried serous exudates covering all or part of the application site, H(3): Small petechial erosions and/or scabs) according to FDA recommendation | Day 8 |
| Number of use of rescue medication | Number of rescue medication use during clinical study | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Patch adhesion assessed by the site staff | Adhesive power of the EFTS will be visually assessed and classified by the site staff in a 5-point-score (0=≥ 90% adhered / 1= ≥75% to <90% adhered / 2=≥50% to <75% adhered / 3=>0% to <50% adhered / 4=completely detached) | Day 2 to Day 5 |
| Patch adhesion assessed by patient | Adhesive power of the EFTS will be visually assessed and classified by a patient in a 5-point-score (0=≥ 90% adhered / 1= ≥75% to <90% adhered / 2=≥50% to <75% adhered / 3=>0% to <50% adhered / 4=completely detached) | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Siemensstr |
| Bonn |
| 53121 |
| Germany |
| Medical Practice Schaale-Maas | Siemensstr | Bonn | 53121 | Germany |
| Medical Practice Pabst | Sportschule Puch | Fürstenfeldbruck | 82556 | Germany |
| Medical Practice Gastl | Römerstraße | Gilching | 82205 | Germany |