Role of Conservative Management in Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction Versus Operative Management
Role of Conservative Management in Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction Versus Operative Management
This study aims to evaluate the role of Conservative management in patients with adhesive Intestinal Obstruction Regarding the selection criteria of the patients, duration of conservative route, success rate, and recurrence of adhesions and avoiding the surgical route complications.
Adhesive Intestinal Obstruction is very common and represents a serious life threatening condition, which can be caused by congenital band, following abdominal surgeries and other medical conditions like tuberculosis.
The management options for adhesive intestinal obstruction (AIO) could be operative treatment (open-laparoscopy) or non-operative (conservative management) according to many reasons.
Some reports indicate that the operative management for adhesive Intestinal obstruction lead to further adhesions in the future in addition to other possible complications (anaesthetic - iatrogenic injury during adhesolysis - wound site infections - illius-long hospital stay).
The Conservative route is recommended in all patients except those with signs of peritonitis, strangulation, or bowel ischemia which would have been diagnosed during physical examination and imaging.
A few studies compared the advantages, safety, and less complications of Conservative versus operative management. Therefore, this study will be conducted on patients with adhesive Intestinal Obstruction to compare the effectiveness of Conservative versus operative management regarding the selection criteria for the patients, the duration of the Conservative route, things to be done and what need to be observed during the conversation time.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: