EFFECTIVENESS OF ZINC AS AN ADJUVANT TO STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS STANDARD THERAPY ALONE IN CHILDREN (5-10 YEARS) WITH MODERATE PERSISTENT ASTHMA
EFFECTIVENESS OF ZINC AS AN ADJUVANT TO STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS STANDARD THERAPY ALONE IN CHILDREN (5-10 YEARS) WITH MODERATE PERSISTENT ASTHMA
The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of zinc as an adjuvant to standard therapy versus standard therapy alone in children with moderate persistent asthma, as assessed by the Asthma Control Test, in terms of:
HYPOTHESIS Zinc as an adjuvant to standard therapy is more effective than standard therapy alone in managing moderate persistent asthma in children.
DESIGN OF STUDY This is a Randomized Controlled Trial. FOLLOW-UP PROTOCOL The patients will be evaluated at the beginning of the study and then followed up at four weeks and eight weeks after enrollment to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. PRIMARY OUTCOME To assess the improvement in asthma control based on the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively. SECONDARY OUTCOMES
To observe improvement in:
1. Children ( 5-10) years. 2. Either gender. 3.Patient diagnosed with asthma according to the operational definition 4.Child with acute exacerbation of asthma EXCLUSION CRITERIA
1. Demographic data will be collected. 2. A detailed history regarding symptoms, onset, duration of illness, progression, medication, level of asthma control, and general physical and systemic examination will be conducted. 3. Patients with moderate persistent asthma will be identified. 4. Using simple random sampling (lottery method), patients will be assigned into two groups:
Group A (Intervention): Standard therapy + Oral Zinc 20mg/day OD for 2 months.
Group B (Control): Standard therapy only. Follow-Up & Assessment All patients will be trained to maintain a diary, documenting responses to the
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria