Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-513063-45-00 | EU Trial (CTIS) Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| CRM Biometrics GmbH | INDUSTRY |
| SocraTec R&D GmbH | OTHER |
| SocraMetrics GmbH | INDUSTRY |
| HWI pharma services GmbH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EFTS vs. placebo in patients with ankle sprains. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that the EFTS is superior in pain reduction compared to a matching placebo in patients with ankle sprains.
The secondary objective is to evaluate tolerability, local tolerability, and adhesion of EFTS vs. placebo.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TK-254RX | Experimental | Esflurbiprofen Topical System 165 mg Esflurbiprofen |
|
| Placebo patch | Placebo Comparator | Placebo patch does not contain active ingredients but it cannot be distinguished in terms of appearance, consistency, odor, and dosage form |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esflurbiprofen Topical System (EFTS) | Drug | One EFTS is applied to the injured area over consecutive 7 days |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) on pain-on-movement (POM) over 0-48 hours | Calculating the area under the curve for the difference of each pain intensity score by 100-mm-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on movement from the baseline over 0-48 hours after patch application. | Day 1 to Day 3 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 100-mm- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score on pain-on-movement (POM) | VAS score from no pain (0 mm) to worst pain (100 mm) on pain-on-movement by a patient at each time point | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| 100-mm- Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score on pain-at-rest (PAR) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
significant concomitant injury in association with the index soft- tissue injury/contusion or strain; e.g. fracture, nerve injury, ligament disruption, tear of muscle or cartilage, or open wound
current skin disorder or shaving hair at application site
history of excessive sweating/hyperhidrosis inclusive of application site
intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drags (NSAIDs) or analgesics within 36 hours, opioids within 7 days, or corticosteroids (except inhaled corticosteroids for e.g. topical treatment of bronchial asthma) within 60 days of inclusion in the study
intake of long-acting NSAIDs or application of topical medication since the injury (Rest, Ice, Compression, and elevation (RICE) allowed)
participation in a clinical study within 30 days before inclusion in the study or concomitantly
participation in this clinical study in another center
drug or alcohol abuse in the opinion of the Investigator
pregnant and lactating women
women of child-bearing potential (defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant) who are not using an acceptable method of contraception defined as:
known hypersensitivity to Esflurbiprofen, R-flurbiprofen or one of the excipients of the patch
patients with any ongoing condition that may interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of Esflurbiprofen
history of previous significant injury to the same extremity within 6 months
patients with a disease affecting the same limb, such as synovitis, rheumatoid arthritis, arthrosis, etc.
patients having an ongoing painful condition associated with blunt injury/contusion
patients suffering from symptoms of an infectious disease including swelling of any joint of the affected lower limbs
patients who had surgery of the affected lower limb within one year of study entry
patients with significant diseases (defined as a disease which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study; includes patients with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, significant cardiovascular, liver or renal disease)
patients with a blood coagulation disorder
patients who use any impermissible medication
known allergy to paracetamol and galenic components of the rescue medication
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kenichi Nishiyama | Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Practice Ebert | Siemensstr | Bonn | 53121 | Germany | ||
| Medical Practice Prof. Predel |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016512 | Ankle Injuries |
| D014949 | Wounds, Nonpenetrating |
| D017695 | Soft Tissue Injuries |
| D001265 | Athletic Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| INDUSTRY |
| Clinsearch GmbH | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo Patch | Drug | One placebo patch is applied to the injured area over consecutive 7 days |
|
VAS score from no pain (0 mm) to worst pain (100 mm) on PAR (at least 5 min rest) by a patient at each time point |
| Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) on pain-on-movement (POM) | Calculating the area under the curve for the difference of each pain intensity score by 100-mm-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on movement from the baseline over day 1 to day 8. | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) on pain-at-rest (PAR) | Calculating the area under the curve for the difference of each pain intensity score by 100-mm-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest from the baseline over day 1 to day 8. | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Pain Intensity Difference (PID) on pain-on-movement (POM) | Difference of each pain intensity score by 100-mm-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on movement from the baseline at each time point. | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Pain Intensity Difference (PID) on pain-at-rest (PAR) | Difference of each pain intensity score by 100-mm-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on movement from the baseline at each time point. | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Time to meaningful/optimal reduction | Time to meaningful/optimal reduction of pain defined as first at least 30% (meaningful) and 50% (optimal) reduction from baseline of VAS on POM. | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Time to complete resolution |
| Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Responder rate 1 | Responder rate is defined as the number of patients achieving at least 50% reduction from baseline in the VAS score for POM at 48 hours | Day 3 |
| Responder rate 2 | number of patients able to resume training / normal physical activity by 168 hours | Day 8 |
| Resolution of ankle sprain | the percentage of patients who showed POM=PAR=0 at 168 hours | Day 8 |
| Global efficacy assessments 1 by investigator | The global efficacy assessments are evaluated by the Investigator as the response to following questions: "Considering how this treatment has affected the patient since he/she started in the study, how well is he/she doing?" It is assessed on the following 5-point Likert scale: 0 = very good, 1 = good, 2 = fair, 3 = poor, 4 = very poor | Day 3, Day 4 and Day 8 |
| Global efficacy assessments 2 by investigator | The global efficacy assessments are evaluated by the Investigator as the response to following questions: "How would you rate this medication for the treatment of this ankle sprain?" The evaluation is based on the following 5-point Likert scale: 0 = excellent, 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = moderate, 4 = poor | Day 3, Day 4 and Day 8 |
| Global efficacy assessments 1 by patients | The global efficacy assessments are evaluated by the Investigator as the response to following questions: "Considering how this treatment has affected you since you started in the study, how well are you doing?" It is assessed on the following 5-point Likert scale: 0 = very good, 1 = good, 2 = fair, 3 = poor, 4 = very poor | Day 3, Day 4 and Day 8 |
| Global efficacy assessments 2 by patients | The global efficacy assessments are evaluated by the patient as the response to following questions: "How do you rate this medication as a treatment for your ankle sprain?" It is assessed on the following 5-point Likert scale: 0 = excellent, 1 = very good, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor | Day 3, Day 4 and Day 8 |
| Number of use of rescue medication | Number of resucue medication use during clinical study | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Number of patients who experience adverse event and serious adverse event | Characterization of occurrence of adverse events or serious adverse events of TK-254RX or placebo patch | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Characterization of local tolerability | Assessing the local tolerability by using the 8-point dermal response (0: No evidence of irritation, 1: Minimal erythema, barely perceptible, 2: Definite erythema, readily visible, minimal edema or minimal papular response, 3: Erythema and papules, 4: Definite edema, 5: Erythema, edema, and papules, 6: Vesicular eruption, 7: Strong reaction spreading beyond test site) and other effects score (0: No other effect detected, A(0): Slightly glazed appearance, B(1): Markedly glazed appearance, C(2): Glazing with peeling and cracking, F(3): Glazing with fissures, G(3): Film of dried serous exudates covering all or part of the application site, H(3): Small petechial erosions and/or scabs) according to FDA recommendation | Day 8 |
| Patch adhesion assessed by the site staff | Adhesive power of the EFTS will be visually assessed and classified by the site staff in a 5-point-score (0=≥ 90% adhered / 1= ≥75% to <90% adhered / 2=≥50% to <75% adhered / 3=>0% to <50% adhered / 4=completely detached) | Day 2 to Day 5 |
| Patch adhesion assessed by patient | Adhesive power of the EFTS will be visually assessed and classified by a patient in a 5-point-score (0=≥ 90% adhered / 1= ≥75% to <90% adhered / 2=≥50% to <75% adhered / 3=>0% to <50% adhered / 4=completely detached) | Day 1 to Day 8 |
| Siemensstr |
| Bonn |
| 53121 |
| Germany |
| Medical Practice Schaale-Maas | Siemensstr | Bonn | 53121 | Germany |
| Medical Practice Pabst | Sportschule Puch | Fürstenfeldbruck | 82556 | Germany |
| Medical Practice Gastl | Römerstraße | Gilching | 82205 | Germany |