Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Renal Sympathetic Denervation Combined With Aorticorenal Ganglion Ablation vs. Renal Sympathetic Denervation Alone for the Treatment of Hypertension: A Multicenter, Prospective, Proof-of-concept Cohort Trials.
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Renal Sympathetic Denervation Combined With Aorticorenal Ganglion Ablation vs. Renal Sympathetic Denervation Alone for the Treatment of Hypertension: A Multicenter, Prospective, Proof-of-concept Cohort Trials.
The purpose of this prospective cohort proof-of-concept trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) plus aorticorenal ganglion ablation versus RSD alone in the treatment of uncontrolled primary hypertension.
Currently, renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) has become the "third pillar" of hypertension treatment, following lifestyle interventions and pharmacological therapy. However, it still faces challenges such as limited and unstable blood pressure-lowering effects. One of the key factors contributing to the poor efficacy of the procedure is inadequate renal sympathetic nerve ablation, which is influenced by the complex renal artery anatomy and nerve network distribution. From a neuroanatomical perspective, aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) is a crucial hub for sympathetic nerve projection to the kidneys. We hypothesize that on the basis of RSD, additional ablation of aorticorenal ganglion can enhance the BP-lowering effect in patients with uncontrolled primary hypertension. Therefore, we plan to design the first multicenter, prospective, cohort, proof-of-concept trial to compare the efficacy and safety of RSD plus ARG ablation (ARGA) versus RSD alone in the treatment of uncontrolled primary hypertension.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: