Effect of Point-of-care Analysis of Ultrasensitive Troponin I on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain: a Randomized Study (POC Troponina)
Effect of Point-of-care Analysis of Ultrasensitive Troponin I on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain: a Randomized Study (POC Troponina)
This clinical study aims to compare two different methods for measuring high-sensitivity troponin I, a key biomarker used to diagnose heart attacks.
The primary research question is: Does the use of the Atellica VTLi kit from Siemens for high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) testing at the point of care (POC) significantly reduce the average time from admission to hospital discharge compared to the conventional laboratory methodology using the Alinity i kit from ABBOTT?
Participant will:
Researchers will analyze whether the point-of-care testing method helps speed up the hospital discharge process compared to the standard laboratory approach. They will also compare the accuracy of the test results, the time taken for clinical decisions, and the overall cost-effectiveness of the two methods.
Objective: evaluation of the length of hospital stays for patients with chest pain in the Emergency Unit of the Heart Institute-HCFMUSP, comparing two methods of ultrasensitive troponin I dosage: the Atellica VTLi kit from Siemens, used in the point of care methodology, and the Alinity i kit from ABBOTT, used in the local laboratory. The aim is to compare the time elapsed between admission and discharge in the two groups, seeking to identify possible differences in the efficiency and speed of care provided by each method.
Background: cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of mortality and morbidity in patients admitted to the emergency room with chest pain. Among CVDs, ischemic heart disease is the most lethal, accounting for 38% of all CVD deaths in women and 44% in men. Diagnosis in these cases must be rapid and efficient, since the prognosis improves significantly when treatment is started early in patients with ACS.
Study design: randomized, open, comparative and parallel study at a single center.
Sample size: 200 patients
Intervention: eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 into two groups: the POC dosage group and the control group. In both groups, samples will be taken at time zero and after 1 hour.
Primary outcome: Time between admission of a patient with chest pain symptoms to the emergency department of the Heart Institute-HCFMUSP and discharge after diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS)
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
aro@incor.usp.br+55 (11) 2661-5795