Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Experiment 1: Utilizing a transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography/functional near-infrared spectroscopy system, the investigators aim to determine whether transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum can alter neural oscillations and blood flow changes in the prefrontal cortex. The investigators will recruit 80 healthy volunteers and 80 stroke patients with middle cerebral artery infarction, each meeting the inclusion criteria. Twenty healthy volunteers and twenty patients will be randomly selected to receive a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the cerebellar vermis. The investigators will record cerebellar transcranial evoked potentials (TEP) in the EEG to assess cerebellar cortical excitability and inhibition and evaluate individuals using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to analyze changes in prefrontal blood flow and brain networks. The other 40 healthy volunteers and 40 patients will receive a single-pulse TMS to the right or left cerebellum, and similar assessments will be made. The remaining 20 healthy volunteers and 20 patients will receive a sham iTBS, with similar assessments.
Experiment 2: Through a facial expression recognition task, this experiment aims to clarify the cerebellum's increased perception of negative emotions, thereby achieving a rebalance from "controlled" to "automatic" regulation of negative emotions, ultimately playing a role in "automatic" emotional adjustment. The 80 healthy volunteers from Experiment 1 will be equally divided into four groups based on stimulation site: the cerebellar vermis; the right cerebellum; the left cerebellum; the sham stimulation. Each group will perform the facial expression recognition task during the TMS stimulation. The investigators will collect functional near-infrared spectroscopy and task-based EEG data from the participants during stimulation while also recording their response times, accuracy rates, and completion conditions, including their tolerance of the experiment and any adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right cerebellar intervention group | Experimental | The single-pulse TMS intervention in right cerebellum |
|
| Left cerebellar intervention group | Experimental | The single-pulse TMS intervention in left cerebellum |
|
| The vermis cerebellar intervention group | Experimental | The single-pulse TMS intervention in vermis cerebellar |
|
| Sham TMS | Sham Comparator | The TMS coil was placed at the cerebellar site but tilted 90° to prevent effective magnetic field penetration. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMS | Device | The single-pulse TMS |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Electroencephalogram | EEG power in the delta, theta, alpha, beta band: the power spectral density (PSD) in unit^2/Hz Functional connectivity---Phase locking value (PLV): The value of PLV ranges from 0 to 1 Event related potentials in amplitude/μV | Day 1 |
| Functional near - infrared spectroscopy , fNIRS | Hemodynamic curve (HbO) in μM | Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mini-mental state examination,MMSE | Mini-mental state examination,MMSE: A score of 27-30: normal; Score < 27: cognitive impairment. | Day 1 |
| Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA | Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: The total score of the scale is 30 points, and the test result shows that the normal value is ≥26 points. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yao Zhou | Contact | 17752812831 | 15608719662@163.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Day 1 |
| Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD | Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD: A total score of more than 35 May indicate severe depression. | Day 1 |
| Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA | Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA: The total score ≥29, may be severe anxiety; ≥21 points, there must be obvious anxiety; ≥14 points, definitely have anxiety; More than 7 points, may have anxiety; If the score is less than 7, there is no anxiety symptom | Day 1 |
| Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale,MADRS | Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale,MADRS: Extreme depression: MADRS >35; Major depression: MADRS >30; Moderate depression: MADRS >22; Mild depression: MADRS >12; Remission stage: MADRS <12. | Day 1 |
| Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report, QIDS-SR16 | Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report, QIDS-SR16: The total score is calculated on a scale of 0 to 27, with higher scores being associated with higher levels of depression. | Day 1 |
| Response time | Recording their response times in seconds: The average reaction time of subjects in the facial expression recognition task to judge each facial expression picture. | Day 1 |
| Accuracy rates | Recording their accuracy rates in % during the task: The average correct rate at which subjects judged each expression picture in the facial expression recognition task. | Day 1 |