Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
CCHF has a wide geographical distribution with cases mainly occurring in Asia, the Middle East, South-Eastern Europe and Africa. Since its emergence in 2002, Turkiye has been the epicentre of activity worldwide reporting up to more than 1000 cases annually. CCHF case management relies on the provision of optimised supportive care; therapeutic options lack a robust evidence base
The UMIT-2 Trial (UMIT = 'Hope' in Turkish) will be the first large randomised controlled trial of novel therapeutics in CCHF, undertaken in multiple trial sites in Turkiye and Iraq. It uses an efficient adaptive platform design (Phase IIb), focussed on antiviral efficacy with interim monitoring to introduce new arms and allow early stopping for futility, efficacy, or safety
This will be a 1:1:1 randomised open-label phase 2b trial of Favipiravir (IV & PO) and Ribavirin (IV & PO) vs optimised standard of care in CCHF aimed at evaluating virological efficacy. This is an adaptive multi-arm Phase II platform for patients with CCHF. Key design features are:
Treatment arms can be added or removed.
Shared standard of care (SoC, control) arm so that a greater proportion of more patients receive experimental therapeutics. Eligibility to randomisation to specific treatment arms is based on treatment specific inclusion/exclusion criteria and all comparisons to SoC are within the same eligibility set and concurrent randomisation.
Timing of interim analyses flexible to make use of the seasonality of CCHF to ensure they take place during low recruitment periods.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimised standard of care (oSOC) | Active Comparator | Optimised standard of care will include treatment per national guidelines for CCHF case management in Turkiye and Iraq, and any other supportive medication or therapies as required. The standard of care arm will exclude any medicine defined as investigation arms of this study. Any supportive medication or therapies will be recorded on the patient CRFs. |
|
| Arm B: Favipiravir | Active Comparator | Day 1 (First 24 hours): IV Favipiravir 2600 mg twice daily (BD) Day 2 (24-48 hours): IV Favipiravir 1200 mg twice daily (BD) Day 3 -7 (Post 48 hours): Oral (PO) Favipiravir 1200 mg twice daily (BD)1 until hospital discharge up to 7 days (14 doses) whichever is soonest. Plus any additional supportive care deemed necessary by the study investigator |
|
| Arm C: Ribavirin | Active Comparator | Day 1 (First 24 hours): IV Ribavirin (33mg/kg) loading dose followed by IV Ribavirin 16mg/kg every 6 hours Day 2 (24-48 hours): IV Ribavirin 16mg/kg four times daily (QDS) Days 3-5: Oral (PO) Ribavirin 16mg/kg four times daily (QDS) Days 6 -7: Oral (PO) Ribavirin 8mg/kg four times daily (QDS) until hospital discharge Plus any additional supportive care deemed necessary by the study investigator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Favipiravir | Drug | 6-fluoro-3-hydroxypyrazine-2-carboxamide, T-705 |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Virologic objective: To compare CCHFV viral dynamics of investigational therapeutics relative to the control arm | Comparison of CCHFV viral load clearance by Day 5 for treatment arms compared to Standard of Care arm. | Day 5 from treatment start |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Objective: To determine the safety and tolerability of investigational therapeutics relative to the control arm | Comparison of incidence of serious adverse events in treatment arms compared to standard of care arm. Comparison of the frequency and characterisation of clinically significant adverse events related to study agent administration (Safety and Tolerability of Favipiravir and Ribavirin CTCAE v5 Grade ≥3 adverse events) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To characterise virus, host immune response and viral resistance over time | Change in host immune response, CCHFV culture and sequencing related to study agent administration | Day 29 |
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult in-patients (≥18 years)
Laboratory confirmed CCHF infection by positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test within 5 days prior to randomisation
Capacity to provide informed consent signed by study patient or legally acceptable representative (for illiterate individuals).
Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) and male patients who are sexually active with WOCBP must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception (as outlined in section 5.4 below) from the first administration of trial treatment, throughout trial treatment and for the duration outlined in trial protocol as well as addition 14 days for women and 7 days for men after the last dose of trial treatment.
Severity Grading System (SGS) for CCHF - mild/moderate.
Less than or equal to 7 days from onset of CCHF symptoms
Willingness to participate in the full protocol
Requirement to be hospitalised for treatment-
Exclusion Criteria:
Stage 4 severe chronic kidney disease or requiring dialysis (i.e., estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Pregnant or breast feeding
Anticipated transfer to another hospital which is not a study site within 72 hours
Known Allergy to any study medication
Patients participating in another clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product (CTIMP) within the last 30 days.
Previous intolerance of Favipiravir or Ribavirin
Any participants deemed not suitable, based on investigators opinion.
Patients taking the drugs listed below within 30 days or 5 times the half-life (whichever is longer) of enrolment:
Pyrazinamide: Pyrazinamide administration with favipiravir examined possible renal urate transporter interactions. Pyrazinamide increased blood uric acid levels 2 to 9 mg/dL over baseline. The addition of favipiravir increased blood uric acid levels 4 to 11 mg/dL over baseline, indicating a moderate additive effect.
Repaglinide: Favipiravir administration with repaglinide, an anti-diabetic agent that is extensively metabolized by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, increased repaglinide plasma AUC 30 to 50% due to inhibition of CYP2C8.
Theophylline: Theophylline administration with favipiravir increases plasma Cmax and AUC of favipiravir through xanthine oxidase (XO) interaction. The primary metabolite of theophylline is known to be metabolized by XO which is partially involved in metabolism of favipiravir.
Famciclovir, Sulindac: Famciclovir and Sulindac are converted to active metabolite by Aldehyde Oxidase (AO). Favipiravir inhibits AO and decrease the concentration of active metabolite of Famciclovir and Sulindac.
Paracetamol: Coadministration of paracetamol (650 mg once daily) and favipiravir (1200 mg twice daily or 800 mg twice daily) increased paracetamol Cmax and AUC by 3% and 16% (1200 mg doses) and by 8% and 14% (800 mg doses). In the UMIT-2 trial after screening and randomisation the daily dose of paracetamol in adults should be no more than 3000 mg/day (rather than 4000 mg/day) -
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006479 | Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001102 | Arbovirus Infections |
| D000079426 | Vector Borne Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D017282 | Tick-Borne Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C462182 | favipiravir |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
1:1:1 randomised open-label phase 2b trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Ribavin |
| Drug |
1-3,4-dihydroxy-5-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide |
|
| Optimised Standard of Care | Other | Optimised standard of care will include treatment per national guidelines for CCHF case management in Turkiye and Iraq, and any other supportive medication or therapies as required. |
|
| Day 29 |
| Clinical Objective: To compare time to successful hospital discharge between participants receiving investigational therapeutics, relative to the control arm | Time from Randomisation to discharge from hospital | Day 29 |
| Antiviral Objective: To evaluate antiviral efficacy of investigational therapeutics (1) | Comparison of CCHFV viral load reduction between for treatment arms compared to Standard of Care arm | Day 10 |
| Antiviral Objective: To evaluate antiviral efficacy of investigational therapeutics (2) | Comparison of Viral load reduction by PCR test for treatment arms compared to Standard of Care arm | Day 10 |
| Safety Objective: To compare the overall mortality in patients with CCHF who receive different investigational therapeutics with those who receive the control arm | Mortality at Days 14 and 28 (time from date of randomisation to death) for treatment arms compared to Standard of Care arm | Day 28 |
| Safety Objective: To compare mortality rates among patients whose baseline predictors of disease place them in different categories for disease severity, who receive different investigational therapeutics. | Mortality at Days 14 and 28 (time from date of randomisation to death) in different SGS groups for treatment arms compared to Standard of Care arm | Day 28 |
| Pharmacokinetic objective:To characterise the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of therapeutics in CCHF | To investigate the exposure-response relationship of Favipiravir on CCHF viral dynamics by analysing concentrations of investigation therapeutics in plasma | Day 29 |
| D014777 |
| Virus Diseases |
| D002044 | Bunyaviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D006482 | Hemorrhagic Fevers, Viral |