Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Added to Splint Therapy Compared to Splint Therapy Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders in Patients Intended for Orthodontic Treatment: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Added to Splint Therapy Compared to Splint Therapy Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders in Patients Intended for Orthodontic Treatment: a Randomized Clinical Trial
A randomized clinical trial evaluates physiotherapy plus splint treatment versus conventional splint treatment in patients with myofascial-origin temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The study follows the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Jaén.
Methodology Participants, recruited from three dental clinics in Spain, must be adults diagnosed with TMD according to the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (DC/TMD). Patients with health conditions that could hinder participation are excluded. They are randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving physiotherapy plus a splint, and the other receiving only a splint.
The sample size was calculated using G*Power, determining that at least 38 patients (19 per group) are required.
Assessments and Measurements Sociodemographic variables include age, sex, BMI, education level, and lifestyle habits. Various instruments are used to assess TMD and pain, such as the DC/TMD, the Fonseca Anamnestic Index, the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, and the Neck Disability Index.
Intervention Physiotherapy + splint group: Four 20-minute manual therapy sessions, including techniques for the temporomandibular joint and cervical muscles.
Splint-only group: Only splint use as prescribed by the dentist. Assessments are conducted before and after treatment for the physiotherapy group and at two time points for the splint-only group (before splint placement and one month later).
Data Analysis SPSS and MedCalc software will be used, with a 95% confidence level. Relationships will be analyzed through regression and Pearson correlation, and group comparisons will be performed using repeated measures ANOVA, Student's t-test, and Chi-square test. Effect size will be calculated using Cohen's d.
In conclusion, the study aims to determine the effectiveness of combined physiotherapy and splint treatment compared to splint-only treatment in patients with myofascial TMD.
A randomized clinical trial of TM treatment has been designed on patients with TMD of myofascial origin susceptible to dental treatment, complying with the ethical principles for biomedical research in humans formalized in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Jaén.
SUBJECTS Subjects are duly informed and their acceptance to participate is formalized by signing an informed consent document where they are also asked for permission to use their photos for the study. Participants are recruited from the Nogales Orthodontic Clinic in Úbeda, the Javier Ruiz Sequera Dental Clinic in Torreperogil, and the SM Medicodental Clinic in Úbeda, Spain. Subjects of legal age affected by myofascial TMD are included, with the diagnosis made using the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (DMD). On the other hand, patients who are not in good physical condition are excluded. The participants were not qualified to understand or carry out the study. The selected participants were randomised into two groups using the Epidat 3.1 software (Conselleria de Sanidade, Xunta de Galicia, Spain), and assigned to a treatment group with physiotherapy plus a splint or another with a conventional approach prescribed with a splint by their dentists.
CALCULATION OF SAMPLE SIZE The sample size was calculated using the G*Power software (latest version 3.1.9.7; Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany) based on the data provided by De Resende et al. A two-tailed hypothesis was considered, 95% power, a p value of 0.05 and an effect size on the VAS of 0.27. A correlation between repeated measures of 0.5 and an effect size of 0.25 were also considered. Taking into account three assessments of the study variables and two study groups, the present study should include a total sample size of at least 38 patients, 19 per group.
MEASUREMENTS All measurements are performed by a trained physiotherapist, who will not know which group each patient belongs to.
The sociodemographic variables taken are age, sex, height, BMI, educational level, whether they work, smoking habits, alcohol habits and physical activity.
Tests and questionnaires:
As for TMD, it is assessed using the DC/TMD, the 'gold standard' test for the diagnosis of TMD, although it is also assessed with the Fonseca Anamnestic Index: a questionnaire made up of 10 questions that can be answered as yes, no and sometimes with a score range between 0 and 100 points.
In addition, pain perception is assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, a test that grades pain between 0 and 10. In this study, the researchers used this test to assess TMD and neck pain.
To assess neck function, the researchers used the Neck Disability Index, a 10-item questionnaire that provides information on how neck pain has affected the ability to manage daily life.
INTERVENTION The treatment protocol for the physiotherapy plus splint group consists of 4 sessions of 20 minutes each of manual therapy that includes the manual techniques found in the previous systematic review: TMJ articulation, intraoral therapy for the pteregoid muscles, manual therapy for the masseter and temporal muscles, treatment of trigger points with ischemic pressure, and manual therapy for the muscles of the cervical region, sternocleidomastoid, suboccipital, and trapezius.
The treatment protocol for the control group consists of only the use of the splint as prescribed by the dentist. The assessments of the subjects in the physiotherapy plus splint group are carried out before and after each treatment, which will be repeated one week, one week after the latter, and one week after this. The assessments of the subjects in the control group will be carried out before placing the splint and one month after it.
DATA ANALYSIS Statistical analysis will be performed with a confidence level of 95% (p<0.05) and the statistical packages SPSS 19.0 and MedCalc 14.12.043 will be used. Continuous variables will be described by means and standard deviations and categorical variables with frequencies and percentages. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to observe the normality of the distribution of the groups. The relationships between the variables will be analyzed by regression and Pearson correlation. Cohen's d will be calculated to measure the effect size in the bivariate analysis and will be calculated as the difference in measurements between the groups divided by the pooled standard deviation of both groups. Cohen's d can be interpreted as the effect size; if the result is 0.2 or less the effect is insignificant, between 0.2 and 0.5 the effect size is small, between 0.5 and 0.8 the effect is medium and a value greater than 0.8 the effect is large. For comparison of the two groups of patients, the Student t-test and the Chi-square test will be used.
Comparisons between the physiotherapy plus splint treatment group and the splint treatment group will be made using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Bonferroni to compare the replicate means for the time points investigated.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: