Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
CONTEXT :
Obesity is a serious disease which affects 17% of the french population. Bariatric and metabolic surgery has demonstrated its efficiency and remains the treatment of reference. Over 40,000 bariatric procedures are performed per year, mainly by laparoscopy ; the robotic approach, historically developed by Intuitive Surgical increases rapidly and accounts for 18% of the procedures in the public system. Whereas the robotic approach has demonstrated its superiority toward laparoscopy for prostatectomies and rectal resections, it still has to be demonstrated for bariatric surgery ; some studies report a decrease rate of complications for complexe procedures and selected patients but the literature remains variable and the benefit of the robot in relation to its high cost must be confirmed.
OBJECTIVES:
To conduct a health-economic assessment (i.e. cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the additional cost per quality adjusted life-year gained) of the Da Vinci robot in bariatric surgery at 1 year, from the Health Care system point of view.
METHOD :
Randomized (482 patients), controlled, single-blind, multicenter, superiority trial comparing two approaches for primary or revisional bariatric surgery: a group benefiting from a robotic approach and a reference group benefiting from a laparoscopic approach. Data from the trial will be matched via the social security number to the French National Health Insurance Information System (SNDS database) in order to collect care consumption. The quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire.
PERSPECTIVES:
This study will have a direct impact on patients care, professional practices and public health policy either by validating the value of the robot in bariatric surgery or conversely, by promoting the laparoscopic approach.
HYPOTHESIS :
Robot-assisted bariatric surgery is more expensive than conventional laparoscopy, but the additional costs associated with the robot are partly offset by a reduction in post-operative complications at 1 year, which should also help to improve patients' quality of life.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted surgical strategy | Experimental | Primary bariatric surgery (According to the recommendations of the High Authority of Health: patient with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and/or BMI ≥35 kg/m2 associated with at least one comorbidity and/or BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m2 and suffering from type 2 diabetes) or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a robotic approach. |
|
| Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy | Active Comparator | Primary bariatric surgery (According to the recommendations of the High Authority of Health: patient with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 and/or BMI ≥35 kg/m2 associated with at least one comorbidity and/or BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m2 and suffering from type 2 diabetes) or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a conventional laparoscopic approach. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robot-assisted surgical strategy | Procedure | Primary or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a robotic approach. The robot used will be the Da Vinci X or Xi model (depending on the center) from the company Intuitive Surgical. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incremental cost-effectivEness ratio (ICER) | Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) calculated from:
| 1 year after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number, type and severity of intraoperative complications | Number, type (medical or surgical) and severity of intraoperative complications (during surgery) for each procedure according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. | End of the surgery |
| Number, type and severity of postoperative complications |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient aged between 18 and 70 years old,
Female or male patients
Patient eligible for one of the two situations defined below:
Primary bariatric or metabolic surgery, with a BMI corresponding to one of the 3 following situations, in accordance with the french National Authority for Health (HAS) recommendations published in February 2024:
Revision surgery for complication and/or side effects of a previous bariatric surgery
Patient who has benefited from a pluridisciplinary evaluation (medical, surgical, psychiatric), with a favorable opinion for a bariatric.
Patient who agrees to be included in the study and who signs the informed consent form,
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maud ROBERT, MD, PHD | Contact | +33 4 72 11 62 63 | maud.robert@chu-lyon.fr | |
| Dominique DELAUNAY, MD, PHD | Contact | +33 4 72 11 00 64 | dominique.delaunay@chu-lyon.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Département de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin Place Amélie Raba Léon 33076 BORDEAUX | Recruiting | Bordeaux | 33076 | France |
Not provided
Prospective multicenter randomized, controlled in 2 parallel groups, single-blind, superiority trial comparing 2 modalities of bariatric surgery (first-line or revision):
Not provided
Not provided
Single-blind study: patient will not be informed of the approach (laparoscopic or robotic) which will be used for their intervention.
|
| Conventional laparoscopic surgical strategy | Procedure | Primary or revision bariatric surgery (for complications or side effects of a previous surgery), using a conventional laparoscopic approach |
|
| Visual analog scale | Other | All patients will have pain evaluation with visual analog scale |
|
| EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | Other | All patients will have quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire |
|
| Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL) questionnaire | Other | All patients will have Quality of life assessment with IWQOL questionnaire |
|
Number, type (medical or surgical) and severity of complications (within 1 year after surgery) for each procedure according to the Dindo-Clavien classification |
| 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery |
| Pain assessment | Pain will be assessed 1 day, 2 days and 1 month after surgery, according to a visual analogic scale (VAS). The VAS measures the intensity of pain on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 representing no pain and at the opposite end, 10 representing extreme pain | 1 day, 2 days and 1 month after surgery |
| Readmission rate | Number of patients readmitted within 1 year after surgery. | 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery |
| Reintervention rate | Number of patients for whom reintervention was necessary within 1 year after surgery. | 1, 3 and 12 months after surgery |
| Quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | This questionnaire is divided into 2 parts: A first part with the questions called "EQ-5D descriptive system", representing 5 dimensions: Mobility, Personal autonomy, Current activities, Pain and discomfort, Anxiety and depression. The response is based on 5-point scales (1: no problem; 2: mild problems; 3: moderate problems; 4: severe problems; 5: extreme problems or total incapacity). This part is completed by a visual analog scale, called "EQ-5D VAS". It consists of a 20 cm line, graduated from 0 to 100, where the patient must indicate how they evaluate their current state of health, 0 being the worst possible state and 100 the best | Before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery |
| Quality of life assessment with IWQOL questionnaire | This questionnaire includes five health concepts: mobility, self-esteem, social life, working conditions and sex life. Five answers will be offered to patients for each item and each answer will be assigned a score ranging from 1 to 5. The most pejorative score is 155. | Before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery |
| Duration of surgery | Operative time expressed in minutes | End of the surgery |
| Length of hospital stay | The Length of stay (in days) is based on the number of days of hospitalization from surgery (day of surgery = D0) until the day of discharge | at hospital discharge, an average of 3 days +- 2 days |
| Readmission rate in High Dependency unit and/or intensive care unit | Number of patients for whom readmission rate in High Dependency unit and/or intensive care unit was necessary within 1 years after surgery. | Within 12 months after surgery |
| Cost of the initial hospital stay | the cost of the initial surgical stay for each group will be calculated using the micro-costing method | at hospital discharge, an average of 3 days +- 2 days |
| ICER in subgroup of patients with preoperative BMI < 50 versus patients with preoperative BMI > 50 kg/m2 | Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) | 12 months after surgery |
| ICER in subgroup of patients age > 60 years old versus patients age < 60 years | Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) | 12 months after surgery |
| ICER in subgroup of patients with primary surgery versus patients with revisional surgery | Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) | 12 months after surgery |
| ICER in subgroup of patients with restrictive surgery versus patients with malabsorptive surgery | Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) | 12 months after surgery |
| ICER depending on preoperative risk | Ratio expressed as additional cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year gained (cost/QALY) | 12 months after surgery |
| Perform a budgeT impact analysis | Financial consequences of adopting robotic from the perspective of the French public health care system at 5 years | 5-year modelling |
| Weight loss | Weight loss at 6 and 12 months expressed as an absolute value (aWL in kg), as a percentage of total weight loss (%TWL; [(Weight at each visit - initial weight) / (initial weight)] × 100), as a percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL; [(Weight at each visit - baseline weight) / (baseline weight - ideal weight)] × 100); as a percentage of excess BMI loss (%BMI; [(BMI at each visit - baseline BMI) / (baseline BMI - ideal BMI)] × 100, using 25 as the ideal BMI). | 6 and 12 months after surgery |
| Changes in treatment | Changes in treatment with antidiabetic, antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and gastro-oesophageal reflux medications | 6 and 12 months after surgery |
| Presence of sleep apnoea syndrome | Assessment of the presence of sleep apnoea syndrome 6 and 12 months after surgery. | 6 and 12 months after surgery |
| Département de chirurgie digestive CHRU Dijon - Hôpital Le Bocage Bd du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 21000 DIJON | Recruiting | Dijon | 21000 | France |
|
| Digestive Surgery Department CHU Grenoble BP217 - 38043 GRENOBLE Cedex 09 | Recruiting | Grenoble | 38043 | France |
|
| Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive Grand Hopital de l'Est Francilien Site de Marne La Vallée 2-4 Cours de la Gondoire 77600 JOSSIGNY | Recruiting | Jossigny | 77600 | France |
|
| Service de Chirurgie Générale et Endocrinienne CHU de Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez 1 rue Michel Polonovski 59000 LILLE | Recruiting | Lille | 59000 | France |
|
| Hospices Civils de Lyon - Hôpital Edouard Herriot Chirurgie Digestive et Bariatrique 5 Place d'Arsonval - 69437 Lyon Cedex 03 - FRANCE | Recruiting | Lyon | 69437 | France |
|
| Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, 6 rue Désirée Clary, 13003 MARSEILLE | Not yet recruiting | Marseille | 13003 | France |
|
| Département de chirurgie digestive et bariatrique CHU de Nantes - Site Hôtel-Dieu - HME 1 Place Alexis Ricordeau 44000 NANTES | Recruiting | Nantes | 44000 | France |
|
| Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantation Hépatique, Hôpital de l'Archet 2, CHU de Nice | Not yet recruiting | Nice | 06202 | France |
|
| Département de Chirurgie digestive Hôpital de la Source CHU d'ORLEANS 14 Avenue de l'hôpital 45100 ORLEANS LA SOURCE | Recruiting | Orléans | 45100 | France |
|
| Service de Chirurgie Digestive Hépato-bilio-pancréatique et Transplantation Hépatique Chirurgie Bariatrique, coelioscopique et robotique AP-HP - Hôpital Universitaire La Pitié Salpêtrière 47-83 boulevard de l'hôpital 75013 PARIS | Recruiting | Paris | 75013 | France |
|
| Département de chirurgie digestive, oncologique et bariatrique AP-HP - Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou 20 rue Leblanc 75015 PARIS | Recruiting | Paris | 75015 | France |
|
| Département de chirurgie digestive, œsogastrique et bariatrique AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard 46 Rue Henri Huchard 75018 PARIS | Recruiting | Paris | 75018 | France |
|
| Département de chirurgie viscérale CHU de Poitiers 2 Rue de la Miletrie - CS 90577 - 86000 POITIERS | Recruiting | Poitiers | 86000 | France |
|
| Clinique Chirurgicale Mutualiste 3 rue le verrier - BP 209 42100 SAINT ETIENNE | Recruiting | Saint-Etienne | 42100 | France |
|
| Département de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne CHU de Strasbourg - Nouvel Hôpital civil Rez-de-chaussée 1 place de l'hôpital BP 426 67091 STRASBOURG cedex | Recruiting | Strasbourg | 67091 | France |
|
| Service de Chirurgie Digestive Hôpital Rangueil - CHU de Toulouse 1 avenue du Pr Jean Poulhès - TSA 50032 31059 TOULOUSE Cedex 9 | Recruiting | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
|
| Département de Chirurgie Viscérale Métabolique et Cancérologique Responsable de l'Unité de Chirurgie Endocrinienne Université de Lorraine CHRU de Nancy - Hôpital Brabois adultes 11 allée du Morvan 54511 VANDOEUVRE LES NANCY | Recruiting | Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy | 54511 | France |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009765 | Obesity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050177 | Overweight |
| D044343 | Overnutrition |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D001835 | Body Weight |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |
Not provided
Not provided