Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Award | Other Identifier | The University of Alabama at Birmingham |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Radiosurgery is the use of a focal high dose of radiation therapy to ablate or kill a tumor. This trial will enroll patients with brain metastases 4 cm or less in greatest diameter and will compare 0mm margin to a 2mm margin for treatment.
Without a stereotactic frame there is considerable variation in practice in the use of planning target volume (PTV) margins for linac radiosurgery. In particular, the use of a single isocenter for multiple targets geometrically increases the risk that rotational errors will result in significant dosimetric errors, and many centers have considered adding margin. A recent AAPM task group survey has found that ~90% of centers worldwide add a PTV margin to account for error and that 8% add more than 2 mm. The most common margin is 2 mm. Other potential reasons to add a margin include spacial MRI error, couch walkout, CBCT to linac isocenter mismatch, and undetected intrafraction motion. Treatment volume is the greatest predictor of radiation toxicity associated with radiosurgery and potentially unnecessary margins will lead to increased risk to the patient. This trial will incorporate a composite endpoint that includes control of the tumor and toxicity.
Uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP) is defined as the chance the tumor is locally controlled (TCP) without grade 3 or greater CNS toxicity (1-NTCP). The investigators hypothesize a 2 mm margin will worsen uncomplicated control compared to a 0 mm PTV margin in the treatment multiple metastases in a single fraction.
This trial will inform the standard of care margin (0 mm vs 2 mm) for single isocenter treatment of multiple targets.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0mm margin | Active Comparator | For each patient two radiation treatment plans will be created. One will have 0 mm margin for the planning target volume. Tumors will be prescribed based upon the maximum diameter of the largest tumor and location at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist with the following guidance: < 2.0 cm diameter 16-20 Gy 2.0-4.0 cm diameter 3 fractions of 9 Gy for total 27 Gy. |
|
| 2mm margin | Active Comparator | For each patient two radiation treatment plans will be created. One will be 2 mm margin for the planning target volume. Tumors will be prescribed based upon the maximum diameter of the largest tumor and location at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist with the following guidance: < 2.0 cm diameter 16-20 Gy 2.0-4.0 cm diameter 3 fractions of 9 Gy for total 27 Gy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| brain metastases radiosurgery | Procedure | Radiosurgery is the use of a focal high dose of radiation therapy to ablate or kill a tumor. This trial will enroll patients with brain metastases 4 cm or less in greatest diameter and will compare 0mm margin to a 2mm margin for treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference between 0mm and 2mm | Fisher's Exact Test to determine if (per patient) uncomplicated control is improved or worsened with the addition of a 2mm PTV margin in the treatment of brain metastases with single isocenter radiosurgery. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum margin size of the tumor | To compare 0mm margin and 2mm margin radiosurgery for local tumor control, RANO assessment by individual tumor calculated by multiplying the longest diameter on an axial slice and its longest perpendicular diameter on the same slice | 12 months |
| Percentage of toxicity |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
INCLUSION OF VULNERABLE PARTICIPANTS Vulnerable populations as defined by the NIH including children, prisoners, and adult subjects who lack capacity to consent to research participation are not eligible.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Fiveash, MD | Contact | 205-975-0224 | jfiveash@uabmc.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John A Fiveash, MD | The University of Alabama at Birmingham | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hazelrig-Salter Radiation Oncology Center | Recruiting | Birmingham | Alabama | 35249 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001932 | Brain Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016543 | Central Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009423 | Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The patients will be blinded but the treating team will not be blinded after both plans are generated and clinically reviewed.
|
To compare 0mm margin and 2mm margin radiosurgery for toxicity. NTCP - assessed per tumor and per patient, assign to all tumors if attribution ambiguous (only grade 3 or greater CNS toxicity included) |
| 12 months |
| Change in normal brain dosimetry | To compare 0mm margin and 2mm margin radiosurgery for normal brain dosimetry.
| 12 months |
| D001927 |
| Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |