Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Compare the diagnostic accuracy of tomosynthesis with 2D mammography in cases with suspected BI-RADS 4 or 5 to determine its potential benefit for staging
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a promising 3D imaging technique for breast imaging that use in breast cancer detection. it acquires reconstructed volume data , the data is reconstructed secondarily in mammary slices from several radiographs acquired from different angles of view (-15â—¦ to +15â—¦ for Fuji). It theoretically improves the sensitivity of detection by enabling enhanced delimitation of the lesion margins, and the specificity by avoiding the problem of glandular superimposition, By separating overlapping breast tissues & it enhances detection of abnormalities located in different planes. DBT has higher breast cancer detection rates and lower recall rates compared with digital mammography (DM). There is also evidence of the diagnostic efficacy of DBT in women with clinical symptoms and women with screen-detected findings who have been recalled for work-up. Consequently, recommendations have been made about the role of DBT in screening asymptomatic women according to their risk levels, in evaluation of symptomatic women, and in work-up of suspicious DM findings. The main objective of this study was to compare tomosynthesis with 2D mammography in cases with suspected BI-RADS 4 or 5 anomalies, to determine its potential benefit for staging.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography | Device | tomosynthesis is 3D image for the breast mammography is 2D image for the breast |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recording The breast density in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions | The breast density according to ACR BIRADS in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions | baseline |
| Recording the type of lesion in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions | the type of lesion (mass , microcalcification , architectural distortion) in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions | baseline |
| Recording the probability of multifocality or multicentricity in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions | the probability of multifocality or multicentricity in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions | baseline |
| Recording the location of the tumor within the mammary quadrants and the depth of the tumor in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions | The location of the tumor within the mammary quadrants (upper , lower , outer , inner ) and the depth (anterior-middle-posterior) of the tumor in both tomosynthesis and mammography for the main and satellite lesions | baseline |
| Recording the tumor histopathology type for the main and satellite lesions | Recording the tumor histopathology type (ductal, lobular , in situ , others) for the main and satellite lesions | baseline |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study included patients with BIRADS 4 or 5 lesions who pathologically proved to be breast cancer by TCNB
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Gamal Rasmy | Contact | +201289374337 | dsilviajesus@gmail.com | |
| Eman Abo Elhamd | Contact | +201001980793 | dr.eman_08@yahoo.com |
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28819781 | Result | Mariscotti G, Durando M, Houssami N, Fasciano M, Tagliafico A, Bosco D, Casella C, Bogetti C, Bergamasco L, Fonio P, Gandini G. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4458-3. Epub 2017 Aug 17. | |
| 28540564 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008327 | Mammography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011859 | Radiography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Result |
| Bernardi D, Belli P, Benelli E, Brancato B, Bucchi L, Calabrese M, Carbonaro LA, Caumo F, Cavallo-Marincola B, Clauser P, Fedato C, Frigerio A, Galli V, Giordano L, Giorgi Rossi P, Golinelli P, Morrone D, Mariscotti G, Martincich L, Montemezzi S, Naldoni C, Paduos A, Panizza P, Pediconi F, Querci F, Rizzo A, Saguatti G, Tagliafico A, Trimboli RM, Zappa M, Zuiani C, Sardanelli F. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists (ICBR) by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Group for Mammography Screening (GISMa). Radiol Med. 2017 Oct;122(10):723-730. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0769-z. Epub 2017 May 25. |
| 30107542 | Result | Marinovich ML, Hunter KE, Macaskill P, Houssami N. Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis or Mammography: A Meta-analysis of Cancer Detection and Recall. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Sep 1;110(9):942-949. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy121. |