Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sakarya University | OTHER |
| Kocaeli University | OTHER |
| Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This multicenter, prospective, real-world study evaluates how two commonly used oral disease-modifying therapies-teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate-affect physical and cognitive fatigability in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS). Fatigability refers to an objective decline in physical or cognitive performance during sustained activity and represents a major barrier to daily functioning for many individuals with MS.
Participants starting either teriflunomide or dimethyl fumarate as part of routine clinical care will be followed for 12 months at regular visits (baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months). At each visit, standardized assessments will measure walking endurance, gait performance, hand function, and information-processing speed. Patient-reported outcomes about fatigue, mood, quality of life, and daily functioning will also be collected. Brain MRI scans performed as part of usual care will be reviewed to document disease activity.
The goal of the ROOF-MS study is to understand whether these two therapies differ in their impact on physical and cognitive fatigability, functional outcomes, symptom burden, and real-world treatment adherence. Because this is an observational study, no experimental treatments are given, and all clinical decisions remain the responsibility of the treating physicians.
By examining fatigability in everyday clinical settings, this study aims to generate evidence that can help patients, families, and health care providers make more informed treatment decisions.
This investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study examines longitudinal changes in physical and cognitive fatigability among adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) initiating teriflunomide or dimethyl fumarate as part of routine clinical care. The study integrates standardized fatigability assessments into real-world clinical workflows across participating neurology centers.
Fatigability represents an objective performance decline during sustained motor or cognitive activity and provides information that is complementary to subjective fatigue ratings. To quantify physical fatigability, the study applies a structured 6-Minute Walk Test protocol in which distance covered during each minute is recorded. The primary physical fatigability index (DWI6-1) is calculated as the percentage change between the first and sixth minutes, enabling sensitive detection of time-dependent gait deterioration. Cognitive fatigability is quantified via a timed Symbol Digit Modalities Test procedure in which correct responses are recorded at three consecutive 30-second intervals. The Cognitive Fatigability Index (CFI-SDMT) reflects the proportional change between early and late test performance. Both indices allow continuous modeling of longitudinal trajectories and group differences.
All assessments are performed at baseline (within 30 days of treatment initiation) and at months 3, 6, 9, and 12. Functional performance measures (6MWT total distance, Timed 25-Foot Walk, Nine-Hole Peg Test), clinical evaluations (EDSS), patient-reported outcomes (FIS, TSQM, HADS), and MRI findings obtained during routine care are incorporated to contextualize patterns of fatigability. Test administration is standardized across centers through written manuals and joint training sessions. To minimize diurnal variability, fatigability tests are scheduled at approximately the same time of day for each participant.
Because the study is non-interventional, treatment decisions-including drug choice, dosing, and management of side effects-are determined solely by treating physicians. Data are recorded in a secure electronic capture platform using coded identifiers, with center-level access restrictions and prospective time-locked entry to maintain data integrity. All analyses follow a predefined statistical plan using mixed-effects modeling with participant- and center-level random effects to account for repeated measures and between-center heterogeneity.
This study aims to clarify real-world differences in fatigability trajectories between teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate and to determine how these trajectories relate to functional performance, symptomatic burden, radiological disease activity, and treatment adherence in routine MS care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teriflunomide Cohort | Participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis who initiate teriflunomide as part of routine clinical care. Individuals in this cohort undergo standardized assessments of physical and cognitive fatigability, functional performance, clinical status, patient-reported outcomes, and routinely obtained MRI findings at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. No experimental treatment is administered, and all therapeutic decisions remain under the responsibility of the treating physician. | ||
| Dimethyl Fumarate Cohort | Participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis who initiate dimethyl fumarate as part of routine clinical care. Individuals in this cohort complete standardized evaluations of physical and cognitive fatigability, functional performance, clinical status, patient-reported outcomes, and routinely acquired MRI measures at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. No experimental intervention is provided, and all treatment decisions are made independently by the treating physician. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Walking Fatigability Index | Walking fatigability will be quantified using the Distance Walk Index (DWI), calculated with the following formula: DWI=(Distance at minute 6-Distance at minute 1Distance at minute 1)×100 DWI=(Distance at minute 1Distance at minute 6-Distance at minute 1 )×100 A DWI decline of >10% will be classified as abnormal, based on prior relapsing-remitting MS studies. Unit of Measurement: Percentage (%) Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months Higher Values Indicate: Better walking endurance (lower fatigability) | Assessments will be conducted at baseline, at three months, at six months, and at twelve months following treatment initiation. |
| Cognitive Fatigability Index | Cognitive fatigability will be quantified using the Cognitive Fatigability Index (CFI), calculated with the following formula: CFI=(SDMT3-SDMT1SDMT1)×100 CFI=(SDMT1SDMT3-SDMT1 )×100 A negative CFI value will indicate cognitive fatigability, with a decline greater than 10% classified as abnormal. Unit of Measurement: Percentage (%) Higher Values Indicate: Better cognitive endurance (lower fatigability) | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Walking Performance | Walking performance will be assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The total distance walked (meters) and walking speed (meters per minute, m/min) will be recorded. Unit of Measurement: Meters (m), Meters per minute (m/min) Higher Values Indicate: Better walking endurance | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety outcomes | The safety profile of teriflunomide will be assessed by monitoring the incidence, severity, and type of adverse events (AEs), including laboratory abnormalities, hair thinning or loss, and other treatment-related side effects. Serious adverse events (SAEs) will be categorized according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0), assessing their severity and relationship to treatment. Unit: Incidence count of AEs/SAEs Higher Values Indicate: Increased treatment-related adverse events |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The study population will consist of adult patients aged 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS), including relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and active secondary progressive MS (SPMS), according to the 2017 revised McDonald criteria. Participants will be selected from routine clinical settings where teriflunomide has been prescribed as part of standard care. Eligible individuals must be ambulatory, with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 7.0 or lower, and capable of performing the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). This population will represent a real-world cohort reflective of patients receiving teriflunomide in typical clinical practice.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mehmet Fatih Yetkin Assoc. Prof. MD, Assoc. Prof. | Contact | 905428203060 | drfatihmehmet@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Husnu Efendi, Prof. | Kocaeli University | Study Chair |
| Mehmet Fatih Yetkin Assoc. Prof. MD, Assoc. Prof. | TC Erciyes University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erciyes University | Kayseri | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33023488 | Background | Comi G, Freedman MS, Meca-Lallana JE, Vermersch P, Kim BJ, Parajeles A, Edwards KR, Gold R, Korideck H, Chavin J, Poole EM, Coyle PK. Prior treatment status: impact on the efficacy and safety of teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01937-4. | |
| 36566698 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
all IPD that underlie results in a publication
Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years after the publication of results
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009103 | Multiple Sclerosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020278 | Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS |
| D020274 | Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D003711 | Demyelinating Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Radiological Outcomes | Radiological outcomes will assess MRI changes at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months to evaluate disease progression and lesion activity in MS. T2 Lesions: Total number of T2-weighted hyperintense lesions. Gadolinium-Enhancing Lesions: Presence and count of Gd-enhancing lesions. New Lesions: Number of newly developed brain and spinal cord lesions. Upper Cervical Spinal Lesions: Presence of lesions in C1-C4 spinal cord region. Brainstem Lesions: Identification of lesions in the brainstem. Unit: Lesion count per MRI scan Higher Values Indicate: Increased disease activity | Radiological outcomes will be assessed at three time points: baseline (prior to treatment initiation), 6 months after starting treatment, and 12 months after starting treatment. |
| Walking Endurance | Walking endurance will be assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Participants will walk at their fastest pace to cover the maximum distance within six minutes, following the standardized protocol by Goldman et al. The total distance walked (meters) will be recorded as the primary measure of endurance. Unit of Measurement: Meters (m) Higher Values Indicate: Better walking endurance (lower fatigability) | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| Processing Speed and Attention | Processing speed and sustained attention will be assessed using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), a validated neurocognitive test. Participants will complete the SDMT in a 90-second timed format following the standardized protocol. Correct responses will be recorded at three consecutive 30-second intervals, and the total number of correct responses will be reported. Unit of Measurement: Number of correct responses Higher Values Indicate: Better cognitive processing speed and sustained attention | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| Hand Coordination and Dexterity | Hand coordination and dexterity will be evaluated using the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) for both hands. The time (in seconds) required to complete the task will be recorded. Unit of Measurement: Seconds (s) Higher Values Indicate: Worse dexterity | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| Fatigue Severity | Fatigue severity will be evaluated using the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), a validated patient-reported measure assessing the perceived impact of fatigue on cognitive, physical, and psychosocial functioning. Participants rate the extent to which fatigue has affected daily activities during the previous month. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue-related impact. Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12 Type of Outcome: Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Method of Aggregation: Mean change from baseline and longitudinal trajectory over 12 months. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| Treatment Satisfaction | Treatment satisfaction will be measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). This instrument assesses satisfaction with medication across different domains (effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction). Unit of Measurement: TSQM Score (range to be specified) Higher Values Indicate: Greater treatment satisfaction | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| Anxiety and Depression | Anxiety and depression symptoms will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), which consists of two subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A): Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety. HADS-Depression (HADS-D): Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptoms. Unit of Measurement: HADS Score (0-21 per subscale) Higher Values Indicate: Greater anxiety or depression | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| From enrollment through study completion at 12 months, with assessments at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months |
| Berkovich R, Negroski D, Wynn D, Sellers D, Bzdek KG, Lublin AL, Rawlings AM, Quach C, Wells DP, Dumlao M, Bora A, Ranno AE, Luo KL, Chavin J, Hua LH, Becker D. Effectiveness and safety of switching to teriflunomide in older patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A real-world retrospective multicenter analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Feb;70:104472. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104472. Epub 2022 Dec 18. |
| 35631424 | Background | Bencsik K, Dobos E, Jobbagy Z, Birkas AJ, Kovacs K, Satori M, Lencses G, Bartok G, Losonczi E, Vecsei L, On Behalf Of The Teri-Real Investigators. Real-World Evidence for Favourable Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Hungarian Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Treated for Two Years with Oral Teriflunomide: Results of the Teri-REAL Study. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 May 13;15(5):598. doi: 10.3390/ph15050598. |
| 38275509 | Background | Elkhooly M, Bao F, Bernitsas E. Impact of Disease Modifying Therapy on MS-Related Fatigue: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci. 2023 Dec 20;14(1):4. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010004. |
| 37861931 | Background | Meca-Lallana JE, Prieto Gonzalez JM, Caminero Rodriguez AB, Olascoaga Urtaza J, Alonso AM, Duran Ferreras E, Espinosa R, Dotor J, Romera M, Ares Luque A, Perez Ruiz D, Calles C, Hernandez MA, Hervas Garcia M, Mendoza Rodriguez A, Berdei Montero Y, Tellez N, Herrera Varo N, Sotoca J, Presas-Rodriguez S, Querol Gutierrez LA, Hervas Pujol M, Batlle Nadal J, Martin Ozaeta G, Gubieras Lillo L, Martinez Yelamos S, Ramio-Torrenta L, Mallada Frechin J, Belenguer Benavides A, Gascon-Gimenez F, Casanova B, Landete Pascual L, Berenguer L, Navarro L, Gomez Gutierrez M, Duran C, Rodriguez Regal A, Alvarez E, Garcia-Estevez DA, Lopez Real AM, Llaneza Gonzalez MA, Marzo Sola ME, Sanchez-Menoyo JL, Oterino A, Villaverde Gonzalez R, Castillo-Trivino T, Alvarez de Arcaya A, Llarena C. Effectiveness and Safety of Teriflunomide in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and Improvements in Quality of Life: Results from the Real-World TERICARE Study. Neurol Ther. 2023 Dec;12(6):2177-2193. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00557-7. Epub 2023 Oct 20. |
| 36297360 | Background | Strosova D, Tuzil J, Turkova BV, Pilnackova BF, de Souza LL, Dolezalova H, Raskova M, Dufek M, Dolezal T. Relationship between Patient Preferences, Attitudes to Treatment, Adherence, and Quality of Life in New Users of Teriflunomide. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Oct 11;15(10):1248. doi: 10.3390/ph15101248. |
| 34486382 | Background | Miller AE. An updated review of teriflunomide's use in multiple sclerosis. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2021 Oct;11(5):387-409. doi: 10.2217/nmt-2021-0014. Epub 2021 Sep 16. |
| 30273841 | Background | Coyle PK, Khatri B, Edwards KR, Meca-Lallana JE, Cavalier S, Rufi P, Benamor M, Thangavelu K, Robinson M, Gold R; Teri-PRO Trial Group. Patient-reported outcomes in patients with relapsing forms of MS switching to teriflunomide from other disease-modifying therapies: Results from the global Phase 4 Teri-PRO study in routine clinical practice. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Nov;26:211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 15. |
| 35696880 | Background | Hestvik ALK, Frederiksen JL, Nielsen HH, Torkildsen O, Eek C, Huang-Link Y, Haghighi S, Tsai JA, Kant M. Real-world study of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with Teriflunomide in Nordic countries: Quality-Of-Life, efficacy, safety and adherence outcomes. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Jul;63:103892. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103892. Epub 2022 May 16. |
| 33291032 | Background | de Seze J, Devy R, Planque E, Delabrousse-Mayoux JP, Vandhuick O, Kabir M, Gherib A. Fatigue in teriflunomide-treated patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the real-world Teri-FAST study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Jan;47:102659. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102659. Epub 2020 Nov 28. |
| 24198223 | Background | Garnock-Jones KP. Teriflunomide: a review of its use in relapsing multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2013 Dec;27(12):1103-23. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0118-2. |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |