Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Instituto de Nutrición y TecnologÃa de los Alimentos | OTHER |
| Bloomberg Philanthropies | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this experiment is to examine the effects of a warning label signaling that a product is ultraprocessed among a sample of Chilean parents. The main questions this experiment aims to answer are:
Do ultraprocessed warning labels on their own impact product purchase intentions?
Do ultraprocessed warning labels impact product purchase intentions in the presence of nutrient warning labels?
Do ultraprocessed warning labels help more consumers identify ultraprocessed foods?
Participants will be randomly assigned to a control arm or an ultraprocessed warning label arm. In both arms, products will carry nutrient warning labels, which are Chile's current policy. Participants will see three similar products, all of which will be ultraprocessed: one not high in any nutrients of concern, one high in sodium, and one high in sodium and saturated fat. For each product, participants will rate their purchase intentions and indicate whether they believe the product to be ultraprocessed. Researchers will compare results across arms.
Participants will complete an online randomized experiment programmed in Qualtrics. After providing informed consent, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two arms: control (i.e., no ultraprocessed warning label) arm or ultraprocessed warning label arm. In both arms, products will carry nutrient warning labels, which are Chile's current policy.
In random order, participants will see three similar mock bags of potato chips. All products seen will be ultraprocessed, and thus carry an ultraprocessed warning label in the ultraprocessed warning label arm. Additionally, one of the products will not be high in any nutrients of concern, one product will be high in sodium, and one product will be high in sodium and saturated fat. For each product, participants will rate their purchase intentions, perceived healthfulness, and indicate whether they believe the product to be ultraprocessed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Active Comparator |
| |
| Ultraprocessed warning label | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Behavioral | Products do not carry ultraprocessed warning label. To match the current Chilean legislation, products carry octagonal nutrient labels when applicable. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Purchase intentions, mean score | How likely the participant would be to buy products will be measured by survey. Response options will be on a 5-point scale from "very unlikely" (coded as 1) to "very likely" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher likelihood of buying products. | During exposure to intervention (i.e., study stimuli), assessed during one-time online 10-minute survey. |
| Correct identification of products as ultraprocessed | Correct identification of products as ultraprocessed will be measured by survey. Response will be coded in a dichotomous 0-1 range, where 1 indicates that the participant correctly identified the products as ultraprocessed and 0 indicates that the participant did not correctly identify the products as ultraprocessed. | During exposure to intervention (i.e., study stimuli), assessed during one-time online 10-minute survey. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived product healthfulness, mean score | How good or bad it would be to consume the product every day will be measured by survey. Response options will be on a 5-point scale from "very bad" (coded as 1) to "very good" (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher perceived product healthfulness. | During exposure to intervention (i.e., study stimuli), assessed during one-time online 10-minute survey. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Aline D'Angelo Campos, MPP | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Gillings School of Global Public Health | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
The Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan will be shared prior to data collection. After data collection and analysis, a de-identified version of individual participant data and the analytic code will be shared through the Open Science Framework (OSF).
The Study Protocol and statistical analysis plan will be available by March 2025 (prior to data collection). A de-identified version of the data collected and analytic code used will become available after data collection and analysis and will remain available indefinitely.
Open access.
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 10, 2025 | Apr 21, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Ultraprocessed warning label | Behavioral | Products carry ultraprocessed warning label. To match the current Chilean legislation, products carry octagonal nutrient labels when applicable. |
|