Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy

Endoscopic Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy: Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two surgical procedures in endoscopic adenoidectomy including Coblation and Suction diathermy

. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Coblation device have less time, less pain, less postoperative crustation and bad odor, less intraoperative bleeding, and less recurrence?

Participants will:

will undergo both procedures every day for 6 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms

Inclusion Criteria:

• all patients aged 2 to 18 years
• patients who had isolated adenoid hypertrophy
• patients' hemoglobin levels above 10 mg/dl

Exclusion Criteria:

• those with recent upper respiratory tract infections, evidence of bleeding disorders, serous otitis media, chronic tonsillitis
• those advised against undergoing adenoidectomy after consulting a phoniatrist
• patients with atrophic rhinitis those with nasal obstruction caused by other nasal or paranasal conditions such as inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Choanal atresia, deviated nasal septum, antrochoanal polyps, and other causes of nasal obstruction in children.