Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PID2022-141198OB-I00 | Other Grant/Funding Number | MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 & FSE+ |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain | OTHER_GOV |
| European Social Fund | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of REVISE (REalidad Virtual Inmersiva y SExualidad), an immersive virtual reality (IVR) intervention designed to promote empathy and reduce sexual harassment behaviors in heterosexual cisgender men.
The main questions that this study aims to answer are as follows.
Does experiencing gender swapping in IVR increase empathy towards survivors of sexual harassment?
Does the intervention modify attitudes toward gender roles and sexual harassment?
Researchers will compare the three experimental groups to evaluate the effects of IVR:
Participants will:
This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the efficacy of REVISE (REalidad Virtual Inmersiva y SExualidad), an immersive virtual reality (IVR) intervention, to promote empathy and reduce sexual harassment behaviors in heterosexual cisgender men. This study will assess whether experiencing sexual harassment from a first-person perspective using IVR embodiment techniques can lead to changes in attitudes and behaviors related to gender roles and sexual violence.
Study Design
Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 1:1:1 allocation ratio.
Population: 90 heterosexual cisgender couples (180 participants) aged 18-39 years.
Study Setting: This study will be conducted in a controlled laboratory environment at the Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation Hub of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), equipped with advanced VR and physiological tracking technologies.
Conditions:
Intervention Duration: One VR session (~60 minutes) with pre- and post-intervention assessments and a three-month follow-up.
Intervention Procedures
Pre-intervention assessment
VR Intervention:
Post-intervention assessment
Three-month follow-up:
Outcome Measures
1. Primary Outcome: Change in empathy scores (Interpersonal Reactivity Index). 2. Secondary Outcomes:
Sample Size Justification A sample of 90 couples (180 individuals) was determined based on an estimated effect size of d = 0.5, an alpha risk of 0.05, and a power of 0.86. Participants will be randomized using block randomization (block sizes of 3 or 6) to ensure balance across the conditions.
Data Management and Quality Assurance
Data Collection
Data Validation and Security
Missing Data Handling:
Statistical Analysis Plan
Primary Analysis:
- Repeated measures ANOVA will assess within- and between-group differences in empathy scores over time.
Secondary Analyses:
Ethical Considerations
Dissemination Plan
The findings will be as follows:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity Exchange with Exposure to Sexual Harassment | Experimental | Participants will experience a virtual reality (VR) perspective-taking intervention in which they embody their female partner's avatar in a scenario depicting sexual harassment. This immersive experience aims to enhance empathy and reduce the acceptance of sexual harassment. Physiological responses (eye tracking and pupillometry) will be recorded, and participants will complete pre- and post-intervention self-reports. |
|
| Identity Exchange without Harassment Exposure | Experimental | Participants will embody their female partner's avatar in a neutral VR scenario without any harassment. This condition serves to evaluate the effects of identity exchange alone, without exposure to gender-based violence, on empathy and gender attitudes. Pre- and post-intervention assessments and physiological measures will be collected. |
|
| Third-Person Observer Condition | No Intervention | Participants will observe a VR scenario depicting sexual harassment from a third-person perspective, without experiencing identity exchange. This condition acts as a control to determine whether passive observation differs from immersive perspective-taking in modifying attitudes toward gender-based violence. Self-reports and physiological responses will be also analyzed. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REVISE - Virtual Reality Gender-Swap with Harassment Exposure | Behavioral | Participants will embody a virtual avatar of their female partner in a sexual harassment scenario using full-body tracking, and identity exchange in virtual reality (VR). The goal is to assess whether experiencing harassment from a first-person perspective increases empathy and decreases tolerance toward sexual harassment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Empathy Scores (Interpersonal Reactivity Index - IRI) | Empathy will be assessed using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), a validated self-report measure that evaluates different components of empathy, including perspective-taking and empathic concern. The IRI consists of 28 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = Does not describe me well to 4 = Describes me very well). The total score ranged from 0 to 112, with higher scores indicating greater levels of empathy. Cronbach's alpha ranged from .68 to .80. Participants will complete the IRI at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately post-intervention, and at a three-month follow-up to assess changes over time. Higher scores indicate greater empathy levels. | Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Gender Role Attitudes (Ambivalent Sexism Inventory - ASI) | Gender role attitudes will be measured using the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI), which assesses two factors: hostile and benevolent sexism. We will use the brief version composed of 12 items (6 items in each factor) with Cronbach's alphas of .75 and .81. Higher scores indicate greater sexist attitudes. Participants will complete the ASI at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up to evaluate changes in gender-related beliefs. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
This study is open to heterosexual cisgender couples, where the male partner identifies as cisgender man and the female partner identifies as cisgender woman. Both partners must be in a romantic relationship at the time of participation. Individuals who identify as non-binary, transgender, or gender non-conforming are not eligible for this study, as the intervention specifically focuses on gender-based perspective-taking between cisgender men and women.
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adrián Montesano, Doctor | Contact | +34625624172 | amontesano@uoc.edu | |
| Pablo Vallejo Medina, Doctor | Contact | +34613028333 | pvallejom@uoc.edu |
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29502500 | Background | Carvalho J, Rosa PJ, Pereira B. Dynamic Risk Factors Characterizing Aggressive Sexual Initiation by Female College Students. J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):2455-2477. doi: 10.1177/0886260518760010. Epub 2018 Mar 5. | |
| 35348918 | Background | Hollett RC, Rogers SL, Florido P, Mosdell B. Body Gaze as a Marker of Sexual Objectification: A New Scale for Pervasive Gaze and Gaze Provocation Behaviors in Heterosexual Women and Men. Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Aug;51(6):2759-2780. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02290-y. Epub 2022 Mar 29. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because of privacy and confidentiality concerns, as the study involves sensitive topics related to sexual harassment and gender identity. Given the nature of the intervention and the potential risk of re-identification, all collected data will be stored securely and will only be accessible to the research team in accordance with institutional ethical guidelines and data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR). Aggregated results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, but the raw participant-level data will remain confidential.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three independent intervention groups:
Each participant remains in their assigned condition throughout the study, and comparisons are made between groups based on empathy, gender attitudes, and harassment-related responses.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| REVISE - Virtual Reality Gender-Swap without Harassment | Behavioral | Participants will embody a virtual avatar of their female partner in a neutral social interaction scenario using VR-based identity exchange. This condition controls for the effect of perspective-taking alone, without exposure to harassment, to evaluate its impact on empathy and gender attitudes. |
|
| Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up |
| Change in Communication Patterns (Communication Patterns Questionnaire - CPQ) | Communication patterns in close relationships will be assessed using the Spanish version of the Communication Patterns Questionnaire (CPQ). The CPQ is a self-report measure that evaluates three dimensions of communication: mutual constructive communication, communication avoidance or demand/withdrawal, and aggressive communication. Participants will complete the CPQ at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately post-intervention, and at a three-month follow-up to assess changes in communication styles over time. The questionnaire consists of 24 items, each rated on a 9-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Very unlikely") to 9 ("Very likely"). Higher scores indicate greater use of the corresponding communication strategy. Cronbach alpha in Spain ranged from .62 to .84. | Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up |
| Change in Relationship Satisfaction (Dyadic Adjustment Scale - DAS) | We will use the Spanish brief version of the DAS. It is composed of 13 items answered in a variable Likert scale and those items are grouped under three second order factors and one of first order structure. The scale in its short form presents a cut-off of 44. The higher the score the best adjustment is observed. Cronbach alpha was .83. | Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up |
| Change in Couple Flourishing (Couple Flourishing Measure - CFM) | Couple flourishing will be assessed using the Couple Flourishing Measure (CFM), a unidimensional self-report instrument. The Spanish validated version by Saavedra-Roa et al. will be used in this study. Participants will complete the CFM at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately post-intervention, and at a three-month follow-up to assess changes in relationship satisfaction and flourishing over time. The questionnaire consists of 16 items, each rated on a 7-point visual analogue Likert scale ranging from 1 (Distressed relationship), 4 (Satisfied relationship), to 7 (Flourishing relationship). The total score ranges from 16 to 112, with higher scores indicating greater couple flourishing. The instrument demonstrated high internal consistency reliability (α = .94). | Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up |
| Change in Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression (AMMSA Scale) | Attitudes towards modern myths about sexual aggression will be assessed using the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale (AMMSA; Gerger et al., 2007). The Spanish adapted and validated version (Megías et al., 2011) will be used in this study. The AMMSA is a self-report measure designed to evaluate subtle beliefs that justify or minimize sexual aggression. Participants will complete the AMMSA at baseline (pre-intervention), immediately post-intervention, and at a three-month follow-up to assess changes in the acceptance of sexual aggression myths over time. The questionnaire consists of 30 items, each rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("Totally disagree") to 7 ("Totally agree"). Higher scores indicate greater acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression. Cronbach alpha in a Spanish sample was .91. | Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3-month follow-up |
| Change in Body Ownership Illusion | Body ownership illusion will be assessed to measure the extent to which participants experience the illusion of embodying their self-avatar and their partner's avatar. This measure evaluates embodiment and agency from a first-person perspective during the VR experience. A validated four-item scale will be administered verbally in two phases: (1) mirror embodiment with the assistant and (2) farewell with the assistant . In the first phase, the assistant will instruct the participant to look into a virtual mirror and ask: "On a scale from 0 to 10, to what extent did you feel that the virtual body in the mirror was your own?" and "When looking down, did you feel that the virtual body was yours?" In the second phase, the assistant will ask: "Did you feel that you owned a different body?" and "Did you feel fear of aggression?" Higher scores indicate a stronger experience of embodiment. | During VR exposure at two assessment points: (1) Mirror embodiment phase (approximately 5 minutes after VR start) and (2) Farewell phase (at the end of VR exposure, approximately 15 minutes after VR start). |
| Change in Physiological Arousal (Pupillometry) | Physiological arousal will be measured using pupillometry, which records minute fluctuations in the pupil diameter in response to stimuli. Pupil dilation is an indicator of autonomic nervous system activation, and greater pupil dilation is associated with negative emotional processing. The key metric recorded will be pupil diameter ratio (measured in millimeters): the relative change in pupil size in response to VR stimuli. The pupil data will be sampled at a minimum frequency of 60 Hz with a visual angle accuracy of 0.5°. Artifacts such as pupil amplitude outliers (<1 mm or >9 mm), drifts, and blinks will be coded as missing values. A 10 Hz low-pass filter will be applied to smooth the data. | From the start of VR exposure until the completion of the VR session (approximately 15 minutes). Data will be collected in real-time during this period. |
| Change in Visual Attention (Eye-Tracking Data) | Visual attention will be assessed using eye tracking technology integrated into VR goggles. Eye tracking measures fixation behavior as an indicator of attention allocation toward erotic stimuli, based on sexual objectification theory (Hollett et al., 2022). Two key parameters will be recorded: 1) fixation count (measured in number of fixations): number of available fixations on a specified area of interest (VR model's neckline) and dwell time (measured in milliseconds), and total duration of fixations on the area of interest (neckline). Fixation was defined as a continuous gaze lasting at least 100 ms. | From the start of VR exposure until the completion of the VR session (approximately 15 minutes). Data will be collected in real-time during this period. |
| Changes in affective responses | Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) will be used to assess participants' affective responses during the intervention. This is a non-verbal, pictorial scale that evaluates three dimensions of emotional reaction: Valence (from negative/unpleasant to positive/pleasant), Arousal (from calm to excited), and Dominance (from feeling dominated to feeling in control). Each dimension is rated on a 9-point scale: 1 indicates the lowest intensity (e.g., unpleasant, calm, or dominated), and 9 indicates the highest intensity (e.g., pleasant, excited, or dominant). Higher scores represent more positive emotional valence, higher arousal, and greater sense of control or dominance | During VR exposure at one assessment point: Farewell phase (at the end of VR exposure, approximately 15 minutes after VR start). |
| Qualitative Insights from Participant Experience | Participants will complete semi-structured interviews post-intervention to explore their experiences and perceptions of the VR embodiment task. Interviews will be transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key themes related to empathy, gender role reflection, and perceived impact of the intervention. | Immediately post-intervention |
| 7962581 | Background | Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9. |
| 33085513 | Background | Ventura S, Cardenas G, Miragall M, Riva G, Banos R. How Does It Feel to Be a Woman Victim of Sexual Harassment? The Effect of 360 degrees -Video-Based Virtual Reality on Empathy and Related Variables. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Apr;24(4):258-266. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0209. Epub 2020 Oct 20. |
| 19892079 | Background | Jouriles EN, McDonald R, Kullowatz A, Rosenfield D, Gomez GS, Cuevas A. Can virtual reality increase the realism of role plays used to teach college women sexual coercion and rape-resistance skills? Behav Ther. 2009 Dec;40(4):337-45. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Oct 31. |
| 27746747 | Background | Riva G, Banos RM, Botella C, Mantovani F, Gaggioli A. Transforming Experience: The Potential of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for Enhancing Personal and Clinical Change. Front Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 30;7:164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00164. eCollection 2016. |
| 25524273 | Background | Maister L, Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV, Tsakiris M. Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;19(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 15. |
| 31160444 | Background | Dobbin F, Kalev A. The promise and peril of sexual harassment programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 18;116(25):12255-12260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818477116. Epub 2019 Jun 3. |
| 29606897 | Background | DeGue S, Valle LA, Holt MK, Massetti GM, Matjasko JL, Tharp AT. A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):346-362. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004. |
| 37939106 | Background | Gunarathne L, Bhowmik J, Apputhurai P, Nedeljkovic M. Factors and consequences associated with intimate partner violence against women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0293295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293295. eCollection 2023. |
| 38538482 | Background | Tourne Garcia M, Herrero Velazquez S, Garriga Puerto A. [Health consequences of violence against women by the couple]. Aten Primaria. 2024 Nov;56(11):102903. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.102903. Epub 2024 Mar 27. Spanish. |
| 42133943 | Derived | Saavedra-Roa A, Vallejo-Medina P, Seinfeld S, Bourdin-Kreitz P, Guillen-Riquelme A, Marsa-Sambola F, Medina JC, Pineda-Marin C, Paz C, Angulo-Brunet A, Montesano A. REVISE Virtual Reality Intervention to Prevent Sexual Harassment in Heterosexual Couples: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026 May 14;15:e91993. doi: 10.2196/91993. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017406 | Sexual Harassment |
| D063507 | Sexism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012725 | Sexual Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D012919 | Social Behavior |
| D011287 | Prejudice |
| D063508 | Social Discrimination |
Not provided
Not provided