Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIV-24-02-046076 | Other Identifier | EUDAMED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new prototype multilayer foam dressing on healthy, intact skin.
The study will find out how well the new prototype dressing stays in place as well as other dressing performance and safety factors when compared to two corresponding, marketed dressings with a similar intended use profile and shape.
The study will compare:
The main aim of the study is to show that the new prototype dressing is not worse than the established marketed comparison dressings in terms of staying in place on human participants at 7 days.
Dressings will have successfully stayed in place if the dressing edges have not lifted to reach the pad, and the pad is not exposed in any way.
Additional data will be collected to further support product performance up to 7 days, including safety information and potential device issues.
This is a single-center prospective, open-label, comparative, interventional study with intra-individual comparison.
Each participant will receive four dressings (two prototype dressings and one of each comparator Marketed dressings). The dressings will be randomized to either the left or right thigh/shin in a 1:1 ratio. Primary analyses will be performed on the following comparison pairs:
120 participants will be recruited into this study at a single, Germany-based site. The sample size accounts for the required 105 evaluable participants and approximately 10% lost to follow-up rate. Participants will be in good general health and have intact skin.
Duration of the study will be 7-14 days, with participants attending 5 site visits. Screening can be completed on Day 0 or at a separate visit up to 7 days prior to Day 0. Dressings will be worn by participants for up to 7 days.
A screening visit will be completed Day -7 to Day 0 to assess participant eligibility and to perform informed consent. Objective and subjective assessments during visits will evaluate dressing performance and conformability properties. On Day 0, dressings will be applied after appropriate skin assessments. On Day 1, 3 and 7, assessments will include acceptable dressing presence, retention, pad integrity, pad lift, border lift, and dressing comfort. On Day 7 or at dressing removal, additional assessments will include adhesive offset on skin, ease of removal and pain on removal. At each visit, photographs of the dressings will be taken. Furthermore, at each visit the skin at the application site will be assessed for any Adverse Events (AE) and the dressings assessed for Device Deficiencies.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prototype dressing vs Marketed dressing 1 | Other | The participant will be randomised to receive the comparison pair Prototype dressing vs Marketed dressing 1 on the left or right thigh/shin in a 1:1 ratio. |
|
| Prototype dressing vs Marketed dressing 2 | Other | The participant will be randomised to receive the comparison pair Prototype dressing vs Marketed dressing 2 on the left or right thigh/shin in a 1:1 ratio. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prototype dressing | Device | Five-layer foam dressing. Size: 10cm x 10 cm. Topical application. Single use. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptable Dressing Presence at Day 7 | Count of dressings with acceptable dressing presence was determined by a yes/no assessment at Day 7, with a 'yes' response defined as the dressing is in place with no border lift reaching the pad and no pad exposure. | Day 7 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptable Dressing Presence at Day 1 and Day 3 | Count of dressings with acceptable dressing presence determined by a yes/no assessment at Day 1 and 3, with a 'yes' response defined as the dressing is in place with no border lift reaching the pad and no pad exposure. | Day 1 and Day 3 |
| Presence of Dressing |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
[*at least 10% of participants are aged >55 years]
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kirstin Deuble-Bente | SGS proderm | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGS Proderm | Schenefeld | Schleswig-Holstein | 22869 | Germany |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prior to application of 4 dressings composed of the 3 different dressing types (1 prototype dressing applied twice and 2 marketed dressings), a physical skin assessment occurred to ensure skin was healthy, intact & hair free. Upon eligibility confirmation, the investigator would apply the appropriate dressing to the randomized left or right thigh/shin so that a total of 4 dressings were applied.
The enrollment period started on 20 January 2025 and ended on 05 March 2025. It required approximately 6 weeks to recruit all participants.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intra-Individual Comparison of Prototype Dressing and Marketed Dressings | Each participant received all 3 available dressings applied to 4 locations (1 prototype dressing applied twice and 2 different marketed dressings). Randomization determined which dressing was applied to either the left or right thigh/shin location in a 1:1 ratio. All participants had 4 dressings applied in total (e.g., prototype dressing + marketed dressing 1 on the shins and prototype dressing + marketed dressing 2 on the thighs, or vice versa). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
The Safety Population (SP) included all participants in the investigation that received at least one of the test products, regardless of the number of further assessments.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intra-Individual Comparison of Prototype Dressing and Marketed Dressings | Each participant received all 3 available dressings applied to 4 locations (1 prototype dressing applied twice and 2 different marketed dressings). Randomization determined which dressing was applied to either the left or right thigh/shin location in a 1:1 ratio. All participants had 4 dressings applied in total (e.g., prototype dressing + marketed dressing 1 on the shins and prototype dressing + marketed dressing 2 on the thighs, or vice versa). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Acceptable Dressing Presence at Day 7 | Count of dressings with acceptable dressing presence was determined by a yes/no assessment at Day 7, with a 'yes' response defined as the dressing is in place with no border lift reaching the pad and no pad exposure. | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) population included all participants in the Safety population with at least one post baseline assessment. | Posted | Count of Units | dressings | Day 7 | dressings | dressings |
|
Adverse events were collected upon dressing application on day 0 to dressing removal at day 7.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Participants: Systemic Events | All participants for events with no product relationship (i.e., unrelated to prototype or marketed dressings) |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
This was a clinical investigation to evaluate the performance of a prototype dressing in comparison to two different comparator dressings. Only participants with healthy and intact skin at the test sites were included in the investigation. Meaning, the test conditions do not try and replicate the use case conditions for wound management as the influence of a wound is not considered. As such the interpretation of the results should not be extended beyond the scope of this investigation.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Manager Clinical Compliance | Smith+Nephew, Inc | +44 (0) 1482 222 200 | datasharing.gcs@smith-nephew.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 23, 2024 | Mar 25, 2026 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 13, 2025 | Mar 25, 2026 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Marketed dressing 1 | Device | Five-layer foam dressing. Size: 12.9cm × 12.9cm. Topical application. Single use. |
|
| Marketed dressing 2 | Device | Five-layer foam dressing. Size: 10cm x 10 cm. Topical application. Single use. |
|
Dressing presence was measured by the count of dressings at day 1, 3 and 7 based on responses to the question "Is the dressing in place?" (yes/no). |
| Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 |
| Pad Integrity | Changes to the integrity of the dressing pad (e.g., bunching, folding, ridges) assessed at Day 1, 3 and 7 by count of dressings categorized as one of the following percentage categories:
| Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 |
| Pad Lift | Lift of the dressing pad assessed at Day 1, 3 and 7 to determine the extent of pad area lifted and no longer adhered to the participant's skin by one of the following pad lift percentage categories:
| Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 |
| Border Lift | Lift of the dressing border assessed at Day 1, 3 and 7 to determine the extent of the border area lifted and no longer adhered to the participant's skin by one of the following border lift percentage categories:
| Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 |
| Dressing Comfort | Dressing comfort assessed at Day 1, 3 and 7 by the participant's answer to the question "was the dressing comfortable during wear?" from one of the following responses:
| Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeters (cm) |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilograms (kg) |
|
| OG002 | Marketed Dressing 2 | Marketed dressing 2 applied on the left or right thigh/shin in a 1:1 ratio. |
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptable Dressing Presence at Day 1 and Day 3 | Count of dressings with acceptable dressing presence determined by a yes/no assessment at Day 1 and 3, with a 'yes' response defined as the dressing is in place with no border lift reaching the pad and no pad exposure. | The Per Protocol (PP) population included all participants in the Full Analysis Set that finished the investigation in accordance with the clinical investigational plan (i.e., protocol) without major protocol deviations. There were 10 participants with major protocol deviations that were excluded from analysis. The data reported is separated by each dressing specified as intended because all participants received all dressings (i.e., same participant population was analyzed for each dressing). | Posted | Count of Units | dressings | Day 1 and Day 3 | dressings | dressings |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Presence of Dressing | Dressing presence was measured by the count of dressings at day 1, 3 and 7 based on responses to the question "Is the dressing in place?" (yes/no). | The Per Protocol (PP) population included all participants in the Full Analysis Set that finished the investigation in accordance with the clinical investigational plan (i.e., protocol) without major protocol deviations. There were 10 participants with major protocol deviations that were excluded from analysis. The data reported is separated by each dressing specified as intended because all participants received all dressings (i.e., same participant population was analyzed for each dressing). | Posted | Count of Units | dressings | Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 | dressings | dressings |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pad Integrity | Changes to the integrity of the dressing pad (e.g., bunching, folding, ridges) assessed at Day 1, 3 and 7 by count of dressings categorized as one of the following percentage categories:
| The Per Protocol (PP) population included all participants in the Full Analysis Set that finished the investigation in accordance with the clinical investigational plan (i.e., protocol) without major protocol deviations. There were 10 participants with major protocol deviations that were excluded from analysis. The data reported is separated by each dressing specified as intended because all participants received all dressings (i.e., same participant population was analyzed for each dressing). | Posted | Count of Units | dressings | Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 | dressings | dressings |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pad Lift | Lift of the dressing pad assessed at Day 1, 3 and 7 to determine the extent of pad area lifted and no longer adhered to the participant's skin by one of the following pad lift percentage categories:
| The Per Protocol (PP) population included all participants in the Full Analysis Set that finished the investigation in accordance with the clinical investigational plan (i.e., protocol) without major protocol deviations. There were 10 participants with major protocol deviations that were excluded from analysis. The data reported is separated by each dressing specified as intended because all participants received all dressings (i.e., same participant population was analyzed for each dressing). | Posted | Count of Units | dressings | Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 | dressings | dressings |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Border Lift | Lift of the dressing border assessed at Day 1, 3 and 7 to determine the extent of the border area lifted and no longer adhered to the participant's skin by one of the following border lift percentage categories:
| The Per Protocol (PP) population included all participants in the Full Analysis Set that finished the investigation in accordance with the clinical investigational plan (i.e., protocol) without major protocol deviations. There were 10 participants with major protocol deviations that were excluded from analysis. The data reported is separated by each dressing specified as intended because all participants received all dressings (i.e., same participant population was analyzed for each dressing). | Posted | Count of Units | dressings | Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 | dressings | dressings |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Dressing Comfort | Dressing comfort assessed at Day 1, 3 and 7 by the participant's answer to the question "was the dressing comfortable during wear?" from one of the following responses:
| The Per Protocol (PP) population included all participants in the Full Analysis Set that finished the investigation in accordance with the clinical investigational plan (i.e., protocol) without major protocol deviations. There were 10 participants with major protocol deviations that were excluded from analysis. The data reported is separated by each dressing specified as intended because all participants received all dressings (i.e., same participant population was analyzed for each dressing). | Posted | Count of Units | dressings | Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7 | dressings | dressings |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 120 |
| 0 |
| 120 |
| 3 |
| 120 |
| EG001 | Prototype Dressing | Prototype dressing applied on the left or right thigh/shin in a 1:1 ratio. | 0 | 120 | 0 | 120 | 15 | 120 |
| EG002 | Marketed Dressing 1 | Marketed dressing 1 applied on the left or right thigh/shin in a 1:1 ratio. | 0 | 120 | 0 | 120 | 8 | 120 |
| EG003 | Marketed Dressing 2 | Marketed dressing 2 applied on the left or right thigh/shin in a 1:1 ratio. | 0 | 120 | 0 | 120 | 9 | 120 |
| Itching Sensation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin Discoloration | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cold (sniffles) | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Common cold | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Common cold: cough, sniffle | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Investigator is employed by CRO: SGS proderm GmbH. The Study Protocol, section 21.3 states: Investigators may publish results generated from this clinical investigation, but not without prior agreement with, and review by, the sponsor, as detailed in the clinical study agreement between sponsor and CRO/investigator.
| Day 3: Acceptable dressing presence |
|
| Day 3: Is the dressing in place? |
|
| Day 7: Is the dressing in place? |
|
| 26%-50% |
|
| 51%-75% |
|
| 76-100% |
|
| Dressing missing |
|
| Day 3: Pad integrity |
|
| Day 7: Pad integrity |
|
| 26%-50% |
|
| 51%-75% |
|
| 76-100% |
|
| Dressing missing |
|
| Day 3: Pad lift |
|
| Day 7: Pad lift |
|
| 26%-50% |
|
| 51%-75% |
|
| 76-100% |
|
| Dressing missing |
|
| Day 3: Border lift |
|
| Day 7: Border lift |
|
| Dressing missing |
|
| Day 3: Was the dressing comfortable during wear? |
|
| Day 7: Was the dressing comfortable during wear? |
|