Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The deleterious effects of alveolar hyperoxia and (severe) hyperoxaemia are well described. Achieving safe and efficient oxygenation may be challenging. The hypothesis of the present study is that closed-loop oxygen control in intubated and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients improves oxygen administration compared with standard manual oxygen titrations. A single-blind, randomised crossover clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of the use of a closed-loop oxygen control versus manual oxygen titration in patients receiving mechanical ventilation has been designed. Patients will be randomised to receive first either closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) or manual oxygen titration (MOT). The percentage of time spent in optimal and sub-optimal SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) ranges will be calculated for each period.
The deleterious effects of alveolar hyperoxia and (severe) hyperoxaemia are well described. A safe and efficient oxygenation should be achieved. However, from a practical point of view, this may require frequent manual adjustments of the inspired oxygen, which might be unfeasible, especially in high-demand periods. Several automatic oxygen systems have been tested in non-intubated patients. The hypothesis of the present study is that closed-loop oxygen control in intubated and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients improves oxygen administration compared with standard manual oxygen titrations. Thus, the objective of the study is to compare the percentage of time spent in a predefined optimal SpO2 range between closed-loop oxygen control and manual oxygen titration.
A single-blind, randomised crossover clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of the use of a closed-loop oxygen control versus manual oxygen titration in patients receiving mechanical ventilation has been designed. Once included, patients will be randomised to receive first either closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) or manual oxygen titration (MOT). Every period will last for 4h. Clinical and respiratory variables will be recorded. A memory box will be connected to the patient's ventilator. This device will record ventilator parameters, including FiO2 and SpO2. To assess the outcome, the percentage of time spent in optimal and sub-optimal SpO2 ranges will be calculated for each period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) | Experimental | Automatic Oxygen management sets the Oxygen control according to the patient's measured SpO2 and the operator-set SpO2 target range during 4h. |
|
| 2. manual oxygen titration (MOT) | Active Comparator | Conventional oxygen manual management according to SpO2 target range set by clinician, during 4h. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) | Device | HAMILTON-C6 (Hamilton Medical, Bonaduz, Switzerland) ventilators will be used. It allows for O2 Assist software, that will be installed on all C6 ventilators before the start of this study. Automatic Oxygen management sets the Oxygen control according to the patient's measured SpO2 and the operator-set SpO2 target range. The Oxygenation controller will be activated for 4h and adjusts the Oxygen according to patient's measured SpO2. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy outcome: | To compare the percentage of time spent in a predefined optimal SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) range between closed-loop oxygen control and manual oxygen titration | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of time with SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) in sub-optimal ranges | To compare the percentage of time with SpO2 in sub-optimal ranges, above and below the optimal range, during closed-loop oxygen control and manual oxygen titration | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Percentage of time with SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) out of range |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parc Tauli Hospital Universitary | Recruiting | Sabadell | Barcelona | 08028 | Spain |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Every patient included will be randomize to recieved both arm in different order. Every period will last for 4 h.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 2. manual oxygen titration (MOT) | Device | O2 will be manually set according to SpO2 target during a 4h period. |
|
To compare the percentage of time with SpO2 out of range, above and below the optimal and sub-optimal range. |
| Hour 1 to 4 |
| Number of manual adjustments | To compare the number of manual adjustments | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Mean SpO2/FiO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio) between the two methods | To compare the mean SpO2/FiO2 between the two methods of oxygen titration | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Mean FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) between the two methods of oxygen titration | To compare the mean FiO2 between the two methods of oxygen titration | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Time with FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) below 40% | To compare the percentage of time with FiO2 below 40% | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Time with FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) above 60% | To compare the percentage of time with FiO2 above 60% | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Time with FiO2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) at 100% | To compare the percentage of time with FiO2 at 100% | Hour 1 to 4 |
| SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) below 88 and 85%. | To compare the percentage of time with SpO2 below 88 and 85%. | Hour 1 to 4 |
| SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) below 88 and 85% (Event > 10s and 60 s) | To compare the number of events with SpO2 below 88 and 85% (Event > 10s and 60 s) | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Number of alarms | To compare the number of alarms | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Time with SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) signal available. | To compare the percentage of time with SpO2 signal available. | Hour 1 to 4 |
| Total amount of oxygen used | To compare the total amount of oxygen used (in L) | Hour 1 to 4 |