Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Interscalene and Shoulder Anterior Capsule Block in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Operations
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Interscalene and Shoulder Anterior Capsule Block in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Operations
Due to the development and easy availability of ultrasonography devices, regional nerve blocks are routinely used by anesthesiologists among multimodal analgesia techniques. Interscalene and supraclavicular nerve blocks are the leading regional anesthesia techniques for shoulder surgeries. However, due to the phrenic nerve involvement and loss of motor function in the upper extremity in these block techniques, new nerve blocks have been developed and used for postoperative analgesia. One of the blocks that has been used increasingly in shoulder region surgeries and does not cause phrenic nerve involvement is the shoulder anterior capsule block (SHAC). The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of interscalene nerve block and SHAC block in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.
Shoulder arthroscopy is one of the most frequently performed orthopedic procedures today. Although it is a minimally invasive procedure, it has been associated with severe postoperative shoulder pain and many techniques have been investigated for pain management. Today, anesthesiologists try to control postoperative pain well as one of the important components of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), as this increases patient comfort and accelerates recovery. At the same time, opioids are tried to be avoided as much as possible while controlling pain due to their serious side effects. For these reasons, interscalene nerve block is frequently used in shoulder arthroscopy patients and provides highly effective and long-lasting postoperative analgesia. Interscalene block can also be used alone for surgical anesthesia in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery and is accepted as the gold standard regional anesthesia technique. However, due to phrenic nerve involvement in interscalene block and loss of motor function in the upper extremity, new nerve blocks continue to be discovered for postoperative analgesia.
In 2020, Altinpulluk et al. showed that methylene blue applied to the deep subscapular muscle in a cadaver, between the humerus head and the area, stained the entire shoulder joint capsule and a certain amount of the axillary region, and they named this new block as pericapsular nerve block (PENG). Kupeli et al. and Ramudarai et al. applied the local anesthetic drug to the interfascial area between the deltoid muscle and the subscapular muscle and named this block as PENG block. The investigators think that this is the axillary nerve block with the Fajardo approach defined by Altınpulluk et al. Because in the cadaver study conducted by Gonzalez et al., it was shown that methylene blue applied between the deltoid muscle and the subscapular muscle did not spread to the pericapsular area. Nevertheless, postoperative analgesia was provided with the local anesthetic drug applied with both approaches and a motor protective effect was demonstrated. The injection made in both areas together can be called shoulder anterior capsule block (SHAC).
In our clinic, in our routine practice, the investigators perform the anesthesia procedure of patients who will undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without general anesthesia, only with interscalene block. Since the SHAC block, which is a relatively new block mentioned above, does not provide sufficient surgical anesthesia on its own, patients must also be placed under general anesthesia. Our study aims to compare patients who have arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under general anesthesia with SHAC block and patients who have arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with interscalene block alone in terms of postoperative analgesia and motor-protective effects.
Materials and methods Ethics This double-blind, single-center, parallel-arm, randomized controlled study was approved by Hitit University Research Ethics Committee, numbered 2024-106. The study will be conducted at Amasya University Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Education and Research Hospital.
Randomization and blinding Patients will be randomly assigned to two equal groups (ISC group or SHAC group) using a computer-assisted randomization method using the "Research Randomizer" program (www.randomizer.org), 46 patients in a 1:1 ratio. Due to the nature of the interventions, blinding will not be possible for the anesthesiologist administering the anesthesia. However, in order to minimize bias, the investigators responsible for the evaluation of postoperative recovery times, pain scores, and opioid-related side effects will be blinded to group assignment throughout the study.
Protocol All patients were subjected to standard monitoring procedures (ECG, pulse-oximetry, blood pressure measurement) as in routine anesthesia practices. Regional block application will be performed in both groups in the preoperative period. In the SHAC group, patients will be placed under general anesthesia after the block, while in the interscalene block group, surgery will be performed only with regional block. After the preoperative block application, patients will be taken to the operation room. An intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device will be attached during transfer to the ward and the patient will be instructed on how to use it. Anesthesia in the operation room will be performed with an intravenous injection of 0.02mg/kg midazolam, 1mcq/kg fentanyl, 2-3mg/kg propofol and 0.6mg/kg rocuronium for patients in the SHAC group. Following intubation, anesthesia will be maintained with the inhalation agent sevoflurane. The target Minimum Alveolar Concentration (MAC) value will be adjusted to 1 MAC. After the surgery is completed, inhalation agents will be stopped, patients will be administered 2-4 mg/kg sugammadex intravenously, which eliminates neuromuscular blockade, and extubated when sufficient tidal volume is spontaneously created. After sufficient anesthetic recovery, the patient will be taken to the recovery room, and when the Aldrete score reaches 10, the patient will be transferred to the ward. During transfer to the ward, an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device will be attached and the patient will be instructed on how to use it.
Patient controlled analgesia drug dose and device settings: Fentanyl will be set to 5mcq/ml, without loading and continuous infusion dose, full dose will be set to 10mcq. Lockout time will be set to 20 minutes, 4hour limit will be set to 100mcq.
Sample Size Calculation:
Since there is no randomized study in the literature that will refer to the primary outcome of our study, Cohen's effect sizes were used as the effect size. Using an independent sample t-test in two groups, the sample size for both groups was 21, with an effect size of 0.8, a margin of error of 0.05, and a power of 0.80, and a total of 42 patients. When the drop out was taken as 10%, the sample size required for the study was found to be 46 patients. G*Power version 3.1.9.4 was used to calculate the sample size.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: