Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study investigates the impact of sensory electrical nerve stimulation (SENS) on hand function in chronic stroke patients. Thirty participants were randomly divided into two groups:
Study Group (A): Received SENS combined with task-specific training.
Control Group (B): Received only task-specific training.
Assessments conducted before and after the intervention included measurements of grip strength, pinch strength, wrist range of motion, and performance on the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT).
This study explores the effectiveness of sensory electrical nerve stimulation (SENS) in enhancing hand function among chronic stroke patients. Thirty participants were randomly divided into two groups:
Study Group (A): Received SENS combined with task-specific training.
Control Group (B): Received only task-specific training.
Assessment Methods:
Before and after the intervention, both groups underwent evaluations using:
Grip Dynamometer: To measure grip strength.
Pinch Dynamometer: To assess pinch strength.
Digital Goniometer: To determine wrist flexion and extension range of motion.
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT): To evaluate upper limb functional performance.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensory electrical stimulation | Experimental | received sensory electrical stimulation and task specific training program |
|
| Task specific training | Active Comparator | received task specific training program only. Patients were tested pre and post treatment by Grip dynamometer, Pinch dynamometer, Digital goniometer and Action Research Arm Test Scale (ARAT). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sensory electrical stimulation | Other | peripheral sensory electrical stimulation on median, ulnar, and radial nerves of affected upper limb, simultaneously with Task Specific Training program which included four subtests of Action Research Arm Test scale. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hand grip strength | The patient seated with his/her shoulder adducted and naturally rotated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees, forearm in neutral position, and wrist between 0- and 30-degrees dorsiflexion and between 0- and 15-degrees ulnar deviation. The Jamar hand dynamometer was set to the second handle position from the inside. Lightly hold around the readout dial to prevent inadvertent dropping. After the patient was positioned properly, the following statement was used "Squeeze as hard as you can…. harder …. harder…. relax" (16). The scores of three successive trials were recorded for each tested hand. The average score of three trials was compared to the normative data on the other side, which is in pounds. | From enrollment to the end of treatment at end of 4th week |
| wrist range of motion | Goniometer was used to assess wrist flexion-extension. | From enrollment to the end of treatment at end of 4th week |
| pinch strength | Three types of pinches were typically evaluated because they are involved in accomplishing occupational tasks and activities efficiently. In Tip Pinch: The patient pinched the ends of the pinch meter between the tips of the thumb and index finger. The test was administered by first giving the patient instructions and a demonstration, "Ready? Pinch as hard as you can." The patient was urged on as he or she attempted to pinch. The average of three trials was recorded. In Lateral Pinch (Key Pinch): The patient pinched the meter between the pad of the thumb and the lateral surface of the index finger. In Palmar Pinch (Three-Jaw Chuck): The patient pinched the meter between the pad of the thumb and the pads of the index and middle fingers | From enrollment to the end of treatment at end of 4th week |
| hand functions | Patients who achieve a maximum score on the first (most difficult) item are credited with having scored 3 on all subsequent items on that scale. If the patient scores less than 3 on the first item, then the second item is assessed. This is the easiest item, and if patients score 0 then they are unlikely to achieve a score above 0 for the remainder of the items and are credited with a zero for the other items. The maximum score on ARTS is 57 points (possible range 0 to 57). |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cairo University | Giza | Giza Governorate | 11835 | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
In the context of the study on sensory electrical nerve stimulation (SENS) for chronic stroke patients, a parallel assignment model was utilized. Participants were randomly divided into two groups:
Study Group (A): Received SENS combined with task-specific training.
Control Group (B): Received only task-specific training.
This design facilitated a direct comparison between the two groups to assess the added benefit of incorporating SENS into the rehabilitation program.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| task specific training program | Other | received task specific training program only. Patients were tested pre and post treatment by Grip dynamometer, Pinch dynamometer, Digital goniometer and Action Research Arm Test Scale (ARAT). |
|
| From enrollment to the end of treatment at end of 4th week |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |