Pain, Anxiety and Anesthetic Satisfaction for Patient With Different State Anxiety Underwent Cataract Surgery With Topical Anesthesia
Pain, Anxiety and Anesthetic Satisfaction for Patient With Different State Anxiety Underwent Cataract Surgery With Topical Anesthesia
This study aims to explore the effects of anxiety traits on pain, anxiety, and anesthesia satisfaction in patients undergoing cataract surgery under topical anesthesia. On the day of recruitment, patients will complete the BAI, STAI-S, and STAI-T anxiety questionnaires to assess baseline anxiety levels. Thirty minutes before the surgery, patients will be randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to receive either Xanax or a placebo and will retake the BAI, STAI-S, and STAI-T questionnaires. After the surgery, patients' pain levels and anesthesia satisfaction will be evaluated, with the pain scale and satisfaction survey repeated the following day. The results will analyze the relationship between anxiety traits and pharmacological interventions on the surgical experience, aiming to optimize surgical procedures and improve overall patient comfort.
BACKGROUNDS Nowadays, phacoemulsification for cataract treatment is the most common surgical procedure performed and anesthetics procedure has been shifted from retrobulbar or peribulbar anesthesia to topical anesthesia (TA). Phacoemulsification under TA is proved to be a safe and low risk procedure with the incidence of adverse events requiring medical emergency team interventions to be 0.04%. However, it is not uncommon that patients can suffer from pain, anxiety and unpleasant visual sensation during this procedure. Complementary sedation has long been thought to alleviate the anxiety and pain of the patient during surgery with local anesthesia. Studies revealed that approximate one fourth of the patients underwent phacoemulsification under TA or retrobulbar anesthesia requested additional intravenous sedation of midazolam. However, the intravenous sedation, such as midazolam, propofol, or etomidate, increase the risk of additional anesthetic complications of heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, and nausea, and therefore, anesthesia monitoring was mandatory during the surgery.
Compared with intravenous sedation, oral sedation is less costly and less invasive. Studies with different oral sedation agents revealed different effect. In the study of 41 patients serving themselves as control, patients reported more pain and photophobia in the surgery with TA alone than the other with midazolam syrup and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate. However, two studies comparing oral diazepam or triazolam with intravenous midazolam showed similar rate of anxiety and pain or noninferior satisfaction. Moreover, the randomized control trial containing 50 procedures in each groups revealed that patients received TA alone during phacoemulsification reported similar pain or anxiety level to those received complementary intravenous midazolam.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
chiunhohou@gmail.com+88623123456 ext. 262131