Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| H20-01683 | Other Identifier | University of British Columbia |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of British Columbia | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to ascertain the practice patterns and predictors in performing lung protective ventilation as per clinical guidelines for adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery in Fraser Health Authority, a large Canadian authority in the lower mainland of British Columbia, Canada. In particular, the investigators explore changes before/after the COVID-19 pandemic. The main questions it aims to answer are:
This is a retrospective study using linked patient data from two databases in the health region: the anesthesia informational management system for intraoperative data, and the electronic medical record for perioperative data.
Rationale for study:
Breathing problems after surgery affect 5% to 33% of patients and can lead to serious issues like lung infections, breathing failure, and longer hospital stays, with up to a 20% risk of death within 30 days for serious cases. A proven way to reduce these risks is lung protective ventilation (LPV), a technique used during surgery where the ventilator delivers smaller breaths based on clinical guidelines and calculated using a person's ideal body weight, while applying gentle pressure to keep the lungs slightly open. While this approach has been widely adopted in intensive care units over the past 20 years, it's less commonly used in operating rooms, with fewer than half of surgeries using it. Barriers include suboptimal default ventilator settings, patients at extremes of weight, and misunderstandings of LPV among clinicians. During the COVID-19 pandemic, LPV use increased for patients with COVID-related lung problems, showing improved survival rates in ICUs. However, it's unclear if this practice carried over to surgical patients at-large or continued after the pandemic. Most studies on LPV during surgery have been conducted outside Canada, where healthcare practices and education may differ from within Canada. To address these gaps, the investigators aim to study LPV use during surgery in a large Canadian health system, identify factors that influence its use, and examine trends during and after the COVID pandemic. This research will help improve patient care by promoting the use of this effective technique in Canadian operating rooms.
This observational study aims to elucidate the patterns and predictors of intraoperative lung protective ventilation (LPV) in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery at Fraser Health Authority, a large Canadian health authority on the west coast of Canada, between 2014-2023. It also assesses the impact of pre-COVID vs. 2020s era on LPV compliance, and interactions of predictors with pre-COVID vs. 2020s era. LPV is defined as both 1) tidal volume of 6-8mL/kg ideal body weight and 2) positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O or more. Intraoperative data will be derived from the intraoperative anesthesia information management system, and the perioperative data from the regional electronic medical record. The investigators will use a predictive logistic regression model to ascertain statistically significant predictors to LPV. Hypothesized predictors of LPV compliance based on literature and expert opinion will be considered for inclusion in the model. Pre-COVID and 2020s data will be compared, and interactions with predictors will be explored. As a secondary analysis, a Shewhart chart will be used to elucidate any special cause variation in LPV compliance introduced by the COVID pandemic. For details of descriptive analyses, model derivation, and Shewhart chart methodology, please refer to study protocol.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-COVID cohort | Before January 2020. The investigators considered before January 2020 as the pre-COVID era, and after June 2020 as the COVID era. The former cutoff was chosen as January 2020 contained the first COVID case in British Columbia, the province containing the study sites. The latter cutoff was chosen as it constitutes three months after March 2020, when the World Health Organization (WHO) announced COVID's pandemic status, and British Columbia announced a state of emergency with the start of isolation policies. The investigators hypothesized that any impact of the COVID pandemic on lung protective ventilation practice patterns would unlikely to have occurred prior COVID's arrival in BC, but would likely be in full swing three months after initiation of widespread social isolation, a very palpable event in society. | ||
| 2020s cohort | After June 2020. The investigators considered before January 2020 as the pre-COVID era, and after June 2020 as the COVID era. The former cutoff was chosen as January 2020 contained the first COVID case in British Columbia, the province containing the study sites. The latter cutoff was chosen as it constitutes three months after March 2020, when the WHO announced COVID's pandemic status, and British Columbia announced a state of emergency with the start of isolation policies. The investigators hypothesized that any impact of the COVID pandemic on lung protective ventilation practice patterns would unlikely to have occurred prior COVID's arrival in BC, but would likely be in full swing three months after initiation of widespread social isolation, a very palpable event in society. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lung protective ventilation compliance | Compliance with ventilation guidelines is defined as meeting two criteria. The first is that their average tidal volume is 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight and the second is that the average positive end expiratory pressure is at least 5 cm H2O. Patients ventilated according to one or neither of the above criteria will not be considered to have been ventilated according to established guidelines. | For patients not ventilated preoperatively: from insertion to removal of endotracheal tube (or until end of case if tube not removed). For already ventilated patients: from start to end of operation. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients from January 2014 to December 2023, age above 18, undergoing non-cardiac and non-thoracic surgery for greater than 30 minutes with an endotracheal tube placed. Both inpatients and outpatients are eligible.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Perseus Missirlis, MD, MSc | University of British Columbia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fraser Health Authority | Surrey | British Columbia | V3T 0H1 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26332856 | Background | Bender SP, Paganelli WC, Gerety LP, Tharp WG, Shanks AM, Housey M, Blank RS, Colquhoun DA, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Jameson LC, Kheterpal S. Intraoperative Lung-Protective Ventilation Trends and Practice Patterns: A Report from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1231-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000940. | |
| 33724961 |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual patient data (IPD) is obtained from medical record registries at Fraser Health Authority. While IPD used in this study will not be shared, these data (and similar data at other time frames) are freely available to investigators of subsequent proposed studies, in collaboration with an investigator at Fraser Health Authority, through the usual data access application mandated by Fraser Health Authority.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan: Original study protocol with statistical analysis plan | Mar 24, 2024 | Dec 27, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan: Revised statistical analysis plan | Apr 15, 2026 | May 27, 2026 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086382 | COVID-19 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011024 | Pneumonia, Viral |
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Parks DA, Short RT, McArdle PJ, Liwo A, Hagood JM, Crump SJ, Bryant AS, Vetter TR, Morgan CJ, Beasley TM, Jones KA. Improving Adherence to Intraoperative Lung-Protective Ventilation Strategies Using Near Real-Time Feedback and Individualized Electronic Reporting. Anesth Analg. 2021 May 1;132(5):1438-1449. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005481. |
| 21552117 | Background | Blum JM, Maile M, Park PK, Morris M, Jewell E, Dechert R, Rosenberg AL. A description of intraoperative ventilator management in patients with acute lung injury and the use of lung protective ventilation strategies. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jul;115(1):75-82. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821a8d63. |
| 29606090 | Background | Kim SH, Na S, Lee WK, Choi H, Kim J. Application of intraoperative lung-protective ventilation varies in accordance with the knowledge of anaesthesiologists: a single-Centre questionnaire study and a retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0495-7. |
| 31587835 | Background | Young CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, Bodnar S, Bukowy B, Elliott RRD, Migliarese J, Ragains C, Trethewey B, Woodward A, Gama de Abreu M, Girard M, Futier E, Mulier JP, Pelosi P, Sprung J. Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):898-913. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Oct 3. |
| 29985541 | Background | Guay J, Ochroch EA, Kopp S. Intraoperative use of low volume ventilation to decrease postoperative mortality, mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay and lung injury in adults without acute lung injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 9;7(7):CD011151. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011151.pub3. |
| 21045639 | Background | Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a. |
| D014777 |
| Virus Diseases |
| D018352 | Coronavirus Infections |
| D003333 | Coronaviridae Infections |
| D030341 | Nidovirales Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |