To characterize the degree of severity of urinary dysfunctions (mild, moderate, severe), we will use the answers to the IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) self-questionnaire. This questionnaire is a screening tool, which helps with the diagnosis and monitoring of symptoms of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). It consists of 7 questions on urinary difficulties and one question on quality of life. Questions include: incomplete bladder emptying, frequency of urination, intermittent urination (stop and restart), urge to urinate (feeling "urgent"), low jet, effort to urinate (force or push), nycturia.

Each question refers to the last month and has a score of 1 to 5, for a total of 35 points maximum.

Patients can be classified according to the severity of symptoms: from 0 to 7 = low symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; from 20 to 35 = severe symptoms.

To characterize the impact of urinary dysfunctions on patient's quality of life, we will use the SF-Qualiveen urological self-questionnaire. This questionnaire was developed to specifically and rapidly assess the impact on quality of life of urinary disorders in patients with a neurological bladder. Its initial validation was performed in patients with multiple sclerosis. This rapid form of the Qualiveen scale has 8 items evaluating 4 domains: discomfort, constraints, fears and patient experience. Each item is rated from 0 to 4

To calculate the prevalence of each type of urinary dysfunctions (urinary incontinence, dysuria, bladder hyperactivity (urgent or pollakiuria)), the percentage of participants with each type of impairment will be calculated as the ratio between the number of subjects in each group of impairment and the total number of participants with a USP score greater than or equal to 1, multiplied by 100.

To calculate the prevalence of biological complications in the upper urinary tract, the percentage of subjects with abnormal renal function at the biological balance will be calculated by the ratio of the number of subjects with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 90 mL/min/1,73 m2 and the total number of participants with a USP score greater than or equal to 1, multiplied by 100.

To calculate the prevalence of structural complications in the upper urinary tract, the percentage of subjects with structural abnormalities of the urinary system will be calculated by the ratio of the number of subjects with pyelocalicial dilation, renal lithiasis or abnormal bladder wall on renal ultrasound and the total number of participants with a USP score greater than or equal to 1, multiplied by 100.

To calculate the prevalence of urinary flow malfunction, the percentage of subjects with functional urinary anomalies will be calculated by the ratio of the number of subjects with a deviation from the bladder emptying curve, or a maximum flow rate < 15 mL at urinary flow, or a post-micturition residue greater than 100 mL and the total number of participants with USP greater than or equal to 1, multiplied by 100.

To assess the prevalence of dysautonomia, the percentage of subjects with dysautonomia will be calculated by the ratio of participants with a positive Sudoscan or orthostatic hypotension test and the total number of participants, multiplied by 100.

To calculate the prevalence of dysautonomia symptoms, the percentage of subjects with dysautonomia symptoms will be calculated as the ratio between the number of subjects with an abnormal response to the SCOPA-AUT (Scales for outcome in Parkinson's disease - Autonomic dysfunction) questionnaire and the total number of participants, multiplied by 100. The SCOPA-AUT is a validated scale developed to assess symptoms of dysautonomia in patients with Parkinson's disease and multisystemic atrophy. It allows to evaluate the symptoms of digestive, urinary, sexual, thermoregulatory, pupillary and cardiovascular dysfunction. It is composed of 26 questions. Each question refers to the last month and has a score of 1 to 4 or 5.

To assess the association between urinary dysfunction and dysautonomia, we will compare the percentage of participants with a UPS score greater than or equal to 1 among participants who have dysautonomia (following the SCOPA-AUT questionnaire, the SUDOSCAN test or the search for orthostatic hypotension), and the percentage of participants with a USP score greater than or equal to 1 among participants without dysautonomia.

To assess the relationship between severity of neurological dysfunction and dysautonomia, we will calculate the SARA (Scale for the assessement and rating of ataxia) score for each participant and divide patients into 3 subgroups: Group 1 (SARA score < 15), Group 2 (SARA score between 15 - 25) and Group 3 (SARA score > 25). The SARA score was developed to evaluate the various deficits resulting from cerebellum dysfunction. It is divided into 8 categories with a cumulative score of 0 (without ataxia) to 40 (the most severe form of ataxia): walking, standing, sitting, speaking, finger hunting, nose test - quick alternate hand movements, heel slip - ankle. For items 5 to 8, the assessment is done bilaterally and then the average value is calculated to obtain the final score.

We will then calculate and compare the percentage of subjects with dysautonomia (following SCOPA AUT questionnaire, SUDOSCAN test or search for orthostatic hypotension) in each SARA score group.

To assess the relationship between urinary dysfunction and severity of neurological dysfunction, we will calculate and compare the percentage of subjects with urological symptoms or a USP score greater than or equal to 1 in each SARA score group.