Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R15AG085170-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of the current study is to determine whether lifting lighter loads close to failure improves strength training adaptations and function in older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare a light-load, high-repetition program to a standard strength training program. Participants will perform supervised strength training twice per week for 20 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light Load, High Repetition (LLHR) | Experimental | The LLHR group will perform a full-body routine with lighter weights, performing 16-20 repetitions per set, close to failure. |
|
| Strength Training (ST) | Active Comparator | The ST group will perform a full-body routine with higher weights, performing 8-12 repetitions per set, close to failure. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strength training | Behavioral | This intervention involves strength training with lighter loads and higher repetitions. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 6-minute walk test | Change in the total distance walked in 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test is an objective, well-validated, and clinically meaningful measure of physical function in older adults. | Baseline and week 21 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lower body maximal muscle strength | Change in lower body maximum muscle strength will be assessed using a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test on a leg press machine. | Baseline and week 21. |
| Lower body muscle power |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Temporary Exclusion Criteria
A person meeting any of the following temporary exclusion criteria at the time of screening will not be enrolled but may be re-screened later.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anoop T Balachandran, PhD | Contact | 718-997-2729 | athozhuthungalba@qc.cuny.edu |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise & Aging Lab, Queens College | Recruiting | Flushing | New York | 11367 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37236327 | Background | T Balachandran A, Wang Y, Szabo F, Watts-Battey C, Schoenfeld BJ, Zenko Z, Quiles N. Comparison of traditional vs. lighter load strength training on fat-free mass, strength, power and affective responses in middle and older-aged adults: A pilot randomized trial. Exp Gerontol. 2023 Jul;178:112219. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112219. Epub 2023 May 30. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055070 | Resistance Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005081 | Exercise Therapy |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Statistician
| Strength training | Behavioral | This intervention involves conventional strength training with higher loads and moderate repetitions. |
|
|
Lower body muscle peak power (W) will be assessed using a pneumatic leg press machine.
| Baseline and week 21 |
| Lean body mass (LBM) | Change in total lean body mass (kg) will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan | Baseline and week 21 |
| Self-reported physical function | Self-reported physical function will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function questionnaire. PROMIS measures are scored on the T-score metric. High scores mean more of the concept being measured. | Baseline and week 21 |
| Get-up & go test | Change in the time (in seconds) taken to complete the get up and go test. The get up & go test will be used to assess lower body dynamic balance and fall risk | Baseline and week 21 |
| 30-second chair stand test | Change in the number of repetitions completed during the 30-Second chair stand test. This test assesses lower body functional strength and power. | Baseline and week 21 |
| Number of participants with adverse events | Number of participants experiencing adverse events that are possibly or definitely related to the intervention, | From enrollment to the end of 20-week intervention period |
| Physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) | Participants will complete the 18-item Physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) to assess their level of physical activity enjoyment. Scores range from 18 to 126 and higher scores indicate greater enjoyment. | Week 21 |
| Exercise self-efficacy questionnaire | Participants will complete the exercise self-efficacy scale to assess their belief in their ability to continue strength training twice per week at the prescribed intensity in the future. Scores range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy. | Week 21 |
| Exercise session attendance | The total number of supervised exercise sessions attended by participants over the 20-week intervention period. | From enrollment to the end of 20-week intervention period |
| D005791 |
| Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D064797 | Physical Conditioning, Human |
| D015444 | Exercise |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D009068 | Movement |
| D009142 | Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena |
| D055687 | Musculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena |