Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, bilateral It is aimed to compare the efficacy of tissue adhesive (Periacryl 90) and silk suture in mandibular impacted wisdom tooth surgery.
In the study carried out on a total of 30 patients, 21 females and 9 males, 60 fully impacted lower wisdom teeth were extracted bilaterally and in the same position. One of the bilateral bilateral teeth of the patients was randomly selected and tissue adhesive (Periacryl 90) was applied for wound closure as the experimental group, while the other tooth was determined as the control group and the wound was closed with silk suture. The selected party was determined by the closed envelope method. After the first impacted tooth was extracted, it was waited until the wound healed and the symptoms disappeared completely, then the other tooth was extracted. In both tooth extractions, wound healing, edema and trismus were evaluated on the 3rd and 7th days. Wound healing was evaluated as good, acceptable and bad. VAS (Visual Analog Scale) was used for pain assessment and assessment was made at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue adhesive (Periacryl 90) | Active Comparator | After the extraction of the impacted lower wisdom tooth, the wound area was closed using tissue adhesive. |
|
| Silk suture | Active Comparator | After the extraction of the impacted lower wisdom tooth, the wound area was closed using silk sutures. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impacted lower wisdom tooth extraction | Procedure | One of the most frequently performed procedures in maxillofacial surgery is impacted wisdom tooth surgery. An impacted tooth is defined as a tooth that is not fully or partially erupted and is blocked from eruption by another tooth, bone, or soft tissue, and thus has a low probability of eruption. The tooth is blocked from eruption by adjacent hard or soft tissue, including bone or dense soft tissue. The most common complications after impacted wisdom tooth surgery are pain, edema, trismus, and alveolar osteitis. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wound Healing | All patients were called for follow-up visits on the 3rd day and 1 week later and were examined by the same physician. During the follow-up visits, the status of wound healing was evaluated in 3 different statuses. These 3 statuses were recorded as good, acceptable and poor. Wound healing deteriorated from good to poor. | 3. and 7. days |
| Edema | In order to evaluate edema, the distances between points marked extra orally in 5 different regions on the face were measured and recorded in mm (angulus-tragus point, angulus-lateral corner of the eye, angulus-nasal wing, angulus-lateral commissure, angulus-pogonion point). | 3. and 7. days |
| Trismus | The evaluation of trismus was evaluated by measuring the mouth opening before the operation and also on the 3rd and 7th days after the operation. The patients were asked to open their mouths as much as possible and the distance between the incisal edges of the lower and upper central incisors was measured in millimeters with the help of a precision ruler. This process was repeated 3 times for each measurement and the arithmetic average of the values found was taken. | 3. and 7. days |
| VAS Pain Scor | VAS (Visual Analog Scale) was used for pain assessment. VAS pain assessment includes scores between 0 and 10. (0: no pain; 10: unbearable pain.) As the score increases, the pain worsens. | 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi | Van | 65080 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32279807 | Background | Bao Z, Gao M, Sun Y, Nian R, Xian M. The recent progress of tissue adhesives in design strategies, adhesive mechanism and applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020 Jun;111:110796. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110796. Epub 2020 Mar 5. | |
| 16274480 | Background | Bamgbose BO, Akinwande JA, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Arotiba GT, Ogunlewe MO. Effects of co-administered dexamethasone and diclofenac potassium on pain, swelling and trismus following third molar surgery. Head Face Med. 2005 Nov 7;1:11. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-1-11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 30, 2023 | Jan 24, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 33425002 | Background | Bal-Ozturk A, Cecen B, Avci-Adali M, Topkaya SN, Alarcin E, Yasayan G, Ethan YC, Bulkurcuoglu B, Akpek A, Avci H, Shi K, Shin SR, Hassan S. Tissue Adhesives: From Research to Clinical Translation. Nano Today. 2021 Feb;36:101049. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101049. Epub 2020 Dec 20. |
| 31029828 | Background | Ballestas SA, Turner TC, Kamalakar A, Stephenson YC, Willett NJ, Goudy SL, Botchwey EA. Improving hard palate wound healing using immune modulatory autotherapies. Acta Biomater. 2019 Jun;91:209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.052. Epub 2019 Apr 25. |
| 29717362 | Background | Asher R, Chacartchi T, Tandlich M, Shapira L, Polak D. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):559-565. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2476-0. Epub 2018 May 2. |
| 10401736 | Background | Amiel GE, Sukhotnik I, Kawar B, Siplovich L. Use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in elective surgical incisions--longterm outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00068-x. |
| 16541920 | Background | American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Ad Hoc Committee on Pedodontic Radiology; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on prescribing dental radiographs for infants, children, adolescents, and persons with special health care needs. Pediatr Dent. 2005-2006;27(7 Suppl):185-6. No abstract available. |
| 35047980 | Background | Al-Moraissi EA, Al-Zendani EA, Al-Selwi AM. Efficacy of Submucosal Injection of Chymotrypsin, Oral Serratiopeptidase or Oral Dexamethasone in Reducing Postoperative Complications Following Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trial. Front Oral Health. 2020 Dec 8;1:575176. doi: 10.3389/froh.2020.575176. eCollection 2020. |
| 24316711 | Background | Akbulut N, Ustuner E, Atakan C, Colok G. Comparison of the effect of naproxen, etodolac and diclofenac on postoperative sequels following third molar surgery: a randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Mar 1;19(2):e149-56. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19518. |
| 29171914 | Background | Ali AS, Benton JA, Yates JM. Risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury with coronectomy vs surgical extraction of mandibular third molars-A comparison of two techniques and review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Mar;45(3):250-257. doi: 10.1111/joor.12589. Epub 2017 Dec 11. |