Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Distance running is one of the most popular and most accessible ways to engage in physical activity. Although distance running offers numerous health-related benefits and protects against noncommunicable diseases (e.g., type 2 diabetic, obesity, hypertension), research has indicated a high prevalence of running-related injuries with a more pronounced incidence among novice runners (i.e., 17.8 injuries per 1000h) compared to their highly trained peers (i.e., 7.2 injuries per 1000h).
Interlimb asymmetry has previously been related to higher injury risk as well as to impaired sports performances. Nevertheless, to date, research on the degree and evolution of functional asymmetry (e.g., unequal strength between limbs) in distance runners is scarce and the role of functional asymmetries in running performance and running-related injuries remains unclear. Moreover, and despite the great number of unilateral tests available in the literature, there currently exists no reliable and run-specific field-based test battery to examine the degree of lower limb asymmetry in distance runners. Therefore, this study aims to assess the test-retest, intra- and inter-rater reliability of a newly created running-specific field-based test battery to assess the presence and degree of functional lower limb asymmetry among novice, moderatly and highly trained distance runners as well as a control group of non-athletes. The second objective is to assess the association between inter-limb asymmetry and running performance.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly-trained distance runners | This study is an observational study and not an interventional study. | ||
| Novice distance runners | This study is an observational study and not an interventional study. | ||
| Non-Athletes | This study is an observational study and not an interventional study. | ||
| Moderately trained distance runners | This study is an observational study and not an interventional stud |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lean mass | Measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. | Baseline |
| Fat mass | Measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. | Baseline |
| Bone mineral density | Measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. | Baseline |
| Phase angle | Measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. | Baseline |
| Lean mass | Measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. | Baseline |
| Fat mass | Measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. | Baseline |
| Total segmental water | Measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. | Baseline |
| Extracellular water | Measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. | Baseline |
| 5 repeated vertical hop test. | Measured using an Optojump device |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | Baseline | |
| Height | Baseline | |
| Leg length |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Being aged between 20 and 50 years at Tfamiliarization
Highly trained distance runners:
Moderately-trained runners:
Running between 40 - 150 km per month for at least 6 months
- Novice distance runners:
Running not more than 10km per week for the past 12 months
- Control group of non-athletes
Performing <75min of systematic moderate to vigorous-intensity physical activity per week and having no experience in systematic (un)structured running activities for the past 5 years
Exclusion Criteria:
• Being younger than 20 years or older than 50 years at Tfamiliarization
Not provided
Not provided
Healthy population (see eligibility criteria)
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joachim D'Hondt | Contact | +32 (0) 629 27 35 | Joachim.dhondt@vub.be |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOVE Research group | Recruiting | Ixelles-Elsene | Brussels Capital | 1050 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| 5 repeated horizontal hop test | Measured using an Optojump device | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| ankle dorsiflexion range of motion | The maximal dorsiflexion range of motion (cm from a wall) will be measured with tape measure. | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| Side bridge endurance test | The side bridge endurance test will be carried out in which, the participants will lie on one side of the body fully extended (i.e., hip and torso at 0°) in a plank position with the feet elevated on a 15-cm step and with the superior feet placed in front. The participants will be instructed to lift the hips until the body is in straight position with the arms folded across the chest. The time until a drop (lasting more than 3s) of the hips from the optimal position will manually be recorded. To control for a full range of motion upon the execution of this muscle capacity tests, a reference dowel will be used to indiciate the desired range of motion. | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| Hip adduction strength | Measured with a handheld dynamometer. | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| Hip abduction strength | Measured using a hand-held dynamometer. | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| Knee extension strength | Measured using a hand-held dynamometer. | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| Knee flexion strength | Measured using a hand-held dynamometer. | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| Ankle dorsiflexion strength | Measured using a hand-held dynamometer. | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| Ankle plantar flexion strength | Measured using a hand-held dynamometer. | 3 test occasions: baseline, 2 weeks after baseline and 4 weeks after baseline. |
| Cooper test | Maximal distance covered in 12 minutes. | This test will be carried out on the second test occasion (two weeks after baseline). |
| Training volume | Surveyed with an online questionnaire and quantified in hours/week (per sport performed). | Baseline |
| Contact time while running | Measures with an Optojump device | This test will be carried out on the third test occasion (four weeks after baseline). |
| Flight time while running | Measured using an Optojump device. | This test will be carried out on the third test occasion (four weeks after baseline). |
| Stride length | Measured using an Optojump device. | This test will be carried out on the third test occasion (four weeks after baseline). |
Measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and a tape measure.
| Baseline |
| Bone mineral content | Measured busing dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. | Baseline |