Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Correlation Between Upper Cross Syndrome and Neck Proprioception
Hypothesis:
No statistically significant relationship exists between upper cross syndrome and neck proprioception.
Study Design:
Randomized Controlled Trial
Participants:
Office workers (≥4h computer use/day) Age: 28-48 years Chronic nonspecific neck pain (>3 months) Forward head posture (FHP) <46° VAS score: 3-8 cm No cognitive impairments affecting participation
Exclusion Criteria:
Systemic, rheumatic, or neuromuscular diseases Neurological signs, spinal surgery, or recent physical therapy Missing ≥3 consecutive or 4 nonconsecutive sessions
Study Title:Correlation Between Upper Cross Syndrome and Neck Proprioception
Hypothesis:There will be no statistically significant relationship between upper cross syndrome and neck proprioception.
Methodology:
Study Design:Randomized controlled trial
Inclusion Criteria:
Office workers using a computer for at least 4 hours daily
Aged between 28 and 48 years
Neck pain (NP) between 3 and 8 cm on a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain)
Chronic nonspecific neck pain lasting for more than 3 months
Forward head posture (FHP) less than 46°
Patients willing and able to participate in an exercise program safely without cognitive impairments that would limit participation
Exclusion Criteria:
Specific causes of NP (e.g., systemic, rheumatic, neuromuscular diseases)
Central or peripheral neurological signs
Cognitive impairment
History of spinal surgery
Physical therapy treatments in the last 6 months prior to baseline assessment
Participants missing at least three consecutive or four nonconsecutive sessions
Outcome Measures:
Spinal Curvature Assessment Using Spinal Mouse DeviceThe spinal mouse device is physically guided along the skin of the spine
Neck Pain MeasurementNP is evaluated using a 10-cm VAS, a widely used clinical tool for assessing pain treatment effectiveness.
Neck Disability Index (NDI)Disability is assessed using the NDI questionnaire.
Measurement of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Using a CROM
Assessment of Cervical Proprioception Using the CROM DeviceHead Reposition Accuracy Tests:
Neutral Head Position (NHP) Test: Measures the ability to actively reposition the head to the self-selected neutral position.
Target Head Position (THP) Test: Measures the ability to actively reposition the head to a previously demonstrated target position.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| control group | Participants with UCS who do not receive the intervention (e.g., may receive standard care, education, or no treatment). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Other | Group/Cohort Description: Participants with Upper Cross Syndrome (UCS) who undergo the prescribed exercise or treatment protocol. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Proprioception: | Measurement Tool: CROM device. Tests: Neutral Head Position (NHP): Assesses participants' ability to actively reposition their head to a self-selected neutral position. Target Head Position (THP): Assesses ability to reposition the head to a previously demonstrated target position. | 8 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Neck Pain | Measurement Tool: Visual Analog Scale (10-cm scale) Purpose: Evaluate participants' subjective pain levels before and after the intervention. Scale Range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate worse pain levels. | 8 weeks |
| Balance |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Curvature: | Measurement Tool: Spinal Mouse Device. Parameters: Sagittal plane alignment in neutral, flexion, and extension. Purpose: Assess structural changes or adaptations in the spine due to UCS. | 8 weeks |
Inclusion Criteria:
office workers (using a computer at least 4 h),
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The study population consists of adult office workers with specific characteristics related to their occupation, posture, and neck pain history. Below is a detailed breakdown:
Demographic Characteristics
Age Range: 28-48 years. Gender: Not specified, but likely includes both males and females. Occupation: Office workers using computers for at least 4 hours daily.
Clinical Characteristics
Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain (CNP):
Pain lasting ≥3 months. Pain intensity between 3-8 cm on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Forward Head Posture (FHP):
Measured angle of FHP is less than 46°.
No Specific Diagnoses:
Participants with neck pain due to systemic, rheumatic, or neuromuscular diseases are excluded.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elsayed | Contact | +20 100 219 5353 | omniaomniamohamed259@gmail.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C537866 | Oculocerebral hypopigmentation syndrome type Preus |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Measurement Tool: Biodex Balance System. Parameters: Static and dynamic balance. Postural stability score (lower scores indicate better balance). Purpose: Explore the effect of UCS on overall balance and stability. |
| 8 weeks |
| Neck Disability Index (NDI): | Measurement Tool: NDI questionnaire. Purpose: Assess the impact of neck pain on daily activities and functional limitations. | 8 weeks |
| Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) | Measurement Tool: CROM device. Purpose: Measure the range of motion in the cervical spine to detect restrictions due to UCS. | 8 weeks |